Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An exploratory study on the application of conceptual knowledge and critical thinking to technological issues

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explored how senior high school students apply their conceptual knowledge, consisting of theoretical and system knowledge, to think critically when confronted with technological issues. We employed a curriculum on the history of communication technology to teach students about basic concepts in communication technology and to cultivate their ability to use critical thinking to confront issues in this domain. Concept mapping was adopted to assess students’ ability to apply conceptual knowledge to their actual cognitive activities, and a critical thinking test was developed to evaluate students’ performance in this regard. The sample consisted of 98 tenth-grade students. We used descriptive statistics, measures of relationships, and qualitative analyses to examine the data. The results indicated that, during the teaching of conceptual knowledge, most students easily fall victim to misconceptions about concepts that they cannot specifically observe in their own experiences and thus find it difficult to construct complete and correct knowledge. Although students’ critical thinking about technological issues was positively correlated with their application of conceptual knowledge, their incomplete system knowledge could affect their ability to identify core problems of technological issues, and incorrect theoretical knowledge could influence their abilities to interpret information, thereby affecting their judgments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Fedaghi, S., Alsaqa, A., & Fadel, Z. (2009). Conceptual model for communication. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 6(2), 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankiewicz, P., De Swardt, E., & De Vries, M. (2006). Some implications of the philosophy of technology for science, technology and society (STS) studies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(2), 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahar, M., & Tongac, E. (2009). The effect of teaching approaches on the pattern of pupils’ cognitive structure: Some evidence from the field. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Williams, P. (2007). Learning elemental structures and dynamic processes in technological systems: A cognitive framework. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(3), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 518–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth Sweeney, L., & Sterman, J. D. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review, 23(2/3), 285–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. N., & Chiu, M. H. (2008). Lakatos scientific research programmes as a framework for analysing informal argumentation about socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1753–1773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skills: Developing effective analysis and argument. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, K. M. (1999). Assessing science understanding through concept maps. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 15–38). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. (2001). Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, J., & Gyberg, P. (2011). Technology in the rear-view mirror: How to better incorporate the history of technology into technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, R., & Sterry, L. (1989). Communication technology. Menomonie, WI: University of Wisconsin-Stout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kek, M. Y. C., & Huijser, H. (2011). The power of problem-based learning in developing critical thinking skills: preparing students for tomorrow’s digital futures in today’s classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koski, M., & De Vries, M. (2013). An exploratory study on how primary pupils approach systems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(4), 835–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leppävirta, J., Kettunen, H., & Sihvola, A. (2011). Complex problem exercises in developing engineering students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of electromagnetics. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(1), 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiorana, V. P. (1992). Critical thinking across the curriculum: Building the analytical classroom. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills/EDINFO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClune, B., & Jarman, R. (2010). Critical reading of science-based news reports: Establishing a knowledge, skills and attitudes framework. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 727–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J. R., & Bell, P. E. (1990). Effects of an environmental education related STS approach instruction on cognitive structures of pre-service science teachers. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 341582).

  • McClure, J. R., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. K. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1/2), 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, S. V. (1997). Value judgments: Evaluating design: A Scottish perspective on a global issue. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(3), 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeck, J. E. (1990). Teaching critical thinking. Routledge, NY: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. (2006). Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P. (1985). Synthesis of research on critical thinking. Educational Leadership, 42(8), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P., & Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating critical thinking: The practitioners’ guide to teaching thinking series. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J., & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pannabecker, J. (2004). Technology education and history: Who’s driving? Journal of Technology Education, 16(1), 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. (1995). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, G., & Young, T. A. (2002). Technically speaking—Why all Americans need to know more about technology. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (2009). Making learning whole: How seven principles of teaching can transform education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. (1996). Teaching critical thinking at the community college. Orlando, FL: Valencia Community College. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED433877).

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. B. (1990). A commitment to critical thinking. New York: Macmillan/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: Teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14, 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University, 162 HePing East Road, Section 1, Taipei, Taiwan

    Kuang-Chao Yu, Kuen-Yi Lin & Szu-Chun Fan

Authors
  1. Kuang-Chao Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kuen-Yi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Szu-Chun Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Szu-Chun Fan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, KC., Lin, KY. & Fan, SC. An exploratory study on the application of conceptual knowledge and critical thinking to technological issues. Int J Technol Des Educ 25, 339–361 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9289-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9289-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation