Information Retrieval

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 520–544

Dealing with temporal variation in patent categorization

  • Eva D’hondt
  • Suzan Verberne
  • Nelleke Oostdijk
  • Jean Beney
  • Cornelius Koster
  • Lou Boves
Information Retrieval in the Intellectual Property Domain

DOI: 10.1007/s10791-014-9239-6

Cite this article as:
D’hondt, E., Verberne, S., Oostdijk, N. et al. Inf Retrieval (2014) 17: 520. doi:10.1007/s10791-014-9239-6

Abstract

In this paper, we quantify the existence of concept drift in patent data, and examine its impact on classification accuracy. When developing algorithms for classifying incoming patent applications with respect to their category in the International Patent Classification (IPC) hierarchy, a temporal mismatch between training data and incoming documents may deteriorate classification results. We measure the effect of this temporal mismatch and aim to tackle it by optimal selection of training data. To illustrate the various aspects of concept drift on IPC class level, we first perform quantitative analyses on a subset of English abstracts extracted from patent documents in the CLEF-IP 2011 patent corpus. In a series of classification experiments, we then show the impact of temporal variation on the classification accuracy of incoming applications. We further examine what training data selection method, combined with our classification approach yields the best classifier; and how combining different text representations may improve patent classification. We found that using the most recent data is a better strategy than static sampling but that extending a set of recent training data with older documents does not harm classification performance. In addition, we confirm previous findings that using 2-skip-2-grams on top of the bag of unigrams structurally improves patent classification. Our work is an important contribution to the research into concept drift for text classification, and to the practice of classifying incoming patent applications.

Keywords

Concept drift Patent classification Text representation 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva D’hondt
    • 1
  • Suzan Verberne
    • 1
  • Nelleke Oostdijk
    • 1
  • Jean Beney
    • 2
  • Cornelius Koster
    • 1
  • Lou Boves
    • 1
  1. 1.Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Université de LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations