Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Basel Convention, US politics, and the emergence of non-state e-waste recycling certification

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While many authors have argued that domestic regulatory gaps as well as a lack of international cooperation can at least partly explain the emergence of non-state regulation, this article will focus on an underexplored pathway of emergence linking international, domestic, and non-state regulation. I will argue that even in the presence of a widely supported international agreement, a non-ratifying country can provide the setting for the emergence of non-state certification programs. This will happen when  significant domestic legislation on the topics covered by the agreement is absent, and non-state actors are able to act as institutional entrepreneurs with an interest in implementing key elements of this agreement. By tracing the development of certification programs for the electronic waste (e-waste) recycling industry, I will show why the US, more than other countries, provided an enabling environment for the emergence of non-state e-waste recycling certification. The US’s failure to ratify the Basel Convention on transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and an overall lack of domestic legislation on e-waste exports created regulatory gaps that non-state actors were able to fill. The main global watchdog of the Convention—the US-based Basel Action Network—used certification as a forum-shifting strategy to implement key parts of the Convention in the US. Finally, the article will also show that conflicting interests and divergent perspectives on the legitimacy of the Convention and its rules have led to the development of a competing industry-supported certification program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Author’s interview with a representative of BAN, April 29, 2009.

  2. This is, for example, proposed in the 2011 US National Strategy for Electronics Stewardship. See Interagency Task Force on Electronics Stewardship (2011, pp. 14–15).

  3. Other certified facilities include six in Canada, six in Mexico, four in the UK, four in Australia, two in Costa Rica, two in India, and one in China, Germany, Malaysia, New Zealand, and Singapore each.

  4. Three facilities in Mexico, one in Canada and one in the UK are also certified.

  5. A proposal for federal legislation to ban the export of a larger set of e-wastes was only first introduced in Congress in 2009. An amended version was reintroduced in 2011.

  6. At the 10th meeting of the Conference of the Parties in October 2011, parties agreed to a solution as part of a package deal. See International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Reporting Services (2011).

  7. Author’s interview with a representative of the US EPA, February 28, 2008.

  8. ibid.

  9. ibid.

  10. Author’s interview with a representative of an electronics recycling company, February 15, 2008.

  11. Author’s interview with IAER, February 4, 2010.

  12. Author’s interview with a representative of an electronics recycling company, January 25, 2008.

  13. Author’s interview with a representative of the US EPA, January 28, 2010.

  14. Author’s interview with a representative of the US EPA, January 28, 2010; Author’s interview with a representative of BAN, April 29, 2009; Author’s interview with a representative of ISRI, January 26, 2010.

  15. Author’s interview with a representative of BAN, April 29, 2009; Author’s interview with a representative of the US EPA, February 28, 2008.

Abbreviations

ANAB:

American National Standards Institute–American Society for Quality National Accreditation Board

ANSI:

American National Standards Institute

ASQ:

American Society for Quality

BAN:

Basel Action Network

BVQI:

Bureau Veritas Quality International

CDM:

Clean Development Mechanism

CRT:

Cathode ray tube

CSR:

Corporate social responsibility

EMS:

Environmental management system

EPA:

Environmental Protection Agency

EU:

European Union

e-waste:

Electronic waste

IAER:

International Association of Electronics Recyclers

IAF:

International Accreditation Forum

ILO:

International Labour Organization

ISEAL:

International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling Alliance

ISO:

International Organization for Standardization

ISRI:

Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries

MPPI:

Mobile Phone Partnership Initiative

NEPSI:

National Electronics Product Stewardship Initiative

NGO:

Non-governmental organization

OECD:

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

R2:

Responsible Recycling Practices for Use in Accredited Certification Programs for Electronics Recyclers

RIOS:

Recycling Industry Operating Standard

US:

United States

WWF:

World Wide Fund for Nature

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges financial support from Yale University's School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) and the Belgian American Educational Foundation (BAEF). The author would also like to thank Graeme Auld, Hans Bruyninckx, Tim Büthe, Benjamin Cashore, Jessica Green, Cory McCruden, Michael Stone, and David Vogel as well as the anonymous reviewers and the editor of International Environmental Agreements for constructive comments on earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Renckens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Renckens, S. The Basel Convention, US politics, and the emergence of non-state e-waste recycling certification. Int Environ Agreements 15, 141–158 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-013-9220-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-013-9220-7

Keywords

Navigation