Abstract
Deregulation and the combined threats of energy crises and global warming concern nations around the world, yet these issues continue to be addressed more directly by domestic regulatory systems than by international institutions. The present analyses of the integration of distributed sources of power generation (DG) into California’s electric utility system suggests that domestic environmental dilemmas with international repercussions provide an obvious entrée for global environmental policy specialists into the practice of environmental policy-making and law. Here I review current scholarship on policy networks that illuminates the contributions that technical and policy experts can make to such networks surrounding environmental issues. I then introduce the key members of California’s “clean DG” policy network that emphasizes the role of academic experts in this influential political system, and discuss how my own research has impacted the development of the state’s DG policy. I conclude that scholars are well positioned to observe and engage domestic and international environmental policy networks, and thereby also to influence environmental politics and law.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DG:
-
Distributed Generation
References
ABB (2002), ‘ABB Sees Billion-dollar Growth Opportunity in Alternative and Renewable Energy’, http://www.abb.com/Global, 19 August 2004
J. E. Allison (1999) ArticleTitle“Fortuitous consequence: The domestic political bases for the 1991 U.S.-Canada air quality agreement’ Policy Studies Journal 27 IssueID2 347–359 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01972.x
J. E. Allison J. Lents (2000) Can We Have Our Cake and Eat it Too?: Creating Distributed Generation Policy to Improve Air Quality Energy Foundation Sacramento, CA 42
J. E. Allison J. Lents (2002) ArticleTitle“Creating distributed generation policy to improve air quality: Can we have our cake and eat it too?’ Energy Policy Journal 30 737–752
Allison, J. E. and J. Lents (2005), Information, Regulation, and Networks: A Tale of Distributed Generation to Improve Air Quality. (46 pp.). Environmental Practice, Forthcoming
J. E. Allison J. Lents (2003) The Four Es of DG Policy in California: Energy, Environment, Economics, and Education California Energy Commission/PIER Sacramento, CA 83
California Air Resources Board (2002), Final Regulation Order: Establish Distributed Generation Certification Order. Executive Order G–02–041. (12 pp.) Sacramento, CA
California Energy Commission (2002), Distributed Generation Strategic Plan. #P27–02–002. (42 pp.) Sacramento, CA
California Public Utilities Commission (2003), PUC Sets Costs for Self-Generation Energy Customers, Providing Exceptions to Promote Clean Alternative Power. Docket #: R.02–01–011. (3 pp.) Sacramento, CA
CBC News Online. (2005) ‘Kyoto Protocol FAQs’, http://www.cbc.ca/news/, 16 February 2005
Energy Tech (2004) ‘Distributed Energy Generation Will Help Reduce Major Blackout Risks’, http://www.spacedaily.com/news/energy-tech-04q.html, 19 August 2004
M. Grubb C. Vrolijk B. Brack (1999) The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment Royal Institute of International Affairs London
M. Haas Peter (1992) ArticleTitle“Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination’ International Organization 46 IssueIDWinter 1–36
H. Heclo (1978) ‘Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment’ Anthony King (Eds) The New American Political System American Enterprise Institute Washington, DC
R. F. Hirsch (1999) Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility System MIT Press Cambridge
H. M. Ingram (1988) ArticleTitle‘State government officials’ Role in U.S./Mexico transboundary resource issues’ Transboundary Resource Issues 28 431–449
D. W. John (1994) Civic Environmentalism Congressional Quarterly Press Washington, DC
T. König (1998) ArticleTitle‘Introduction: Modeling policy networks’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 10 387–389
Lents, J. (2002), ‘Presentation to CAPCOA/Environmental Task Force’, Sacramento CA, 23rd January
MacCracken, C., N. Edmonds, A. J. S. H. Kim and R. D. Sands (1999), ‘The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol’ in J. P. Weyant ed., The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation Cleaveland, Energy Journal. International Association for Energy Economics ISSN 0195–6574
C. Melbeck (1998) ArticleTitle“Comparing local policy networks’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 10 531–52
National Assessment Synthesis Team, U.S. Global Change Research Program. (2004) ‘Climate Change Impacts on the United States: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change’, http://www.gcrio.org/, 21 March 2005
E. Ostrom (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Cambridge University Press Cambridge
M. Schneider J. Scholz M. Lubell D. Mindruta M. Edwardson (2003) ArticleTitle“Building consensual institutions: Networks and the national estuary program’ American Journal of Political Science 47 IssueIDJanuary 143–158
V. Smil (1993) China’s Environmental Crisis: An Inquiry into the Limits of National Development M.E. Sharpe Armonk, NY
Vogel, N. (2000) ‘How State’s Consumers Lost with Electricity Deregulation’, The Los Angeles Times, 9 December
Woolfolk, J. (2000), ‘Energy Crunch Could Foul Air’, San Jose Mercury News, 20 August
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allison, J.E. Distributed Generation of Electricity: The Role of Academic Research and Advice in California’s “Clean DG” Policy Network. Int Environ Agreements 5, 405–414 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-8332-0
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-8332-0