Abstract
What is the role of the social scientist in public affairs? How can scholars balance the demand that their work remains in the realm of the descriptive or the explanatory while also addressing the ongoing practical concerns of politics and economy? How can the effort to work toward this balance take place in an age of mass media? The ideas underlying contemporary social science are not formed in isolation but develop in a specific context with particular constraints and opportunities. Researchers must contend with these parameters and make choices about how to address topics of interest to them while also meeting the requirements of their profession. Scholars approaching their work as public intellectuals face the challenge of having to straddle these two sets of ethics. From the standpoint of science, they are expected to proceed as detached observers, gathering factual information that can shed new light on existing realities. Acting as public intellectuals, however, means that they must also take into consideration the ways their work relates to contemporary trends and events. Doing so means reflecting on their own starting assumptions, systems of categorization, and the methods they employ. It means seeking creative ways to convey ideas and share findings in the public arena. This paper focuses on some of the challenges involved in developing independent and innovative analyses while also contributing to public debate on contemporary social issues. It addresses some of the very formidable obstacles to this goal and discusses some of the ways scholars have been able to operate as social scientists and as public intellectuals, bridging the gap between these two domains. The institutional constraints facing social scientists are manifold, but they are not all encompassing. It is possible to bridge this gap, provided that they develop an awareness of the contextual forces involved and make a conscious effort to act independently in relation to these ongoing pressures. To the extent that social scientists adopt an informed and reflexive orientation in their work, they can be public intellectuals and offer a significant contribution to public affairs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
One example of this line of thought can be found in the work of the structuralists. For an interesting discussion on this topic, please see Godelier (1972).
For more on the role of social scientist in higher education, please see Gattone (2006, pp. 134–136.)
Karl Mannheim drew this distinction in Ideology and Utopia (1968, pp. 140–169).
These are some of the main questions of the sociology of knowledge. For more on this topic, please see Wolff (1983).
For more on the relationship of street theater to cultural change, please see Goldfarb (1998).
An example of this can be found in the documentary film Beyond Beats and Rhymes, produced and directed by Byron Hurt. The film offers a critical examination of the world of Hip Hop, including a discussion of sexism, racism, and the ways the music industry has influenced the genre. Further analysis on this topic can be found in Wagner (2004).
References
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Vive la Crise! For heterodoxy in social science. Theory and Society, 17, 773–787.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). The purpose of reflexive sociology (The Chicago Workshop). In P. Bourdieu & L. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 61–215). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1993). From ruling class to field of power: an interview with Pierre Bourdieu on La noblesse d’Etat. Theory, Culture & Society, 10, 19–44.
Foucault, M. (1980a). Power/knowledge. New York: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1980b). The history of sexuality, volume I: an introduction. New York: Vintage.
Gattone, C. (2006). The social scientist as public intellectual: critical reflections in a changing world. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Gerth, H. (1992). Crisis management of social structures: planning, propaganda and societal morale. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 5, 337–359.
Godelier, M. (1972). Rationality and irrationality in economics (p. 1972). London: NLB.
Goldfarb, J. (1998). Civility and subversion: the intellectual in democratic society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2012). Opposition politics and the internet: a critical/reconstructive approach. In M. G. Durham & D. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: Keyworks (pp. 597–613). Malden: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mannheim, K. (1940). Man and society in an age of reconstruction. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Mannheim, K. (1968). Ideology and Utopia, an introduction to the sociology of knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Smith, D. (1989). Sociological theory: Methods of writing patriarchy. In R. A. Wallace (Ed.), Feminism and sociological theory (pp. 34–64). Newbury Park: Sage.
Straubhaar, J. (2012). (Re)Asserting national television and national identity against the global, regional, and local levels of world television. In M. G. Durham & D. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: keyworks (pp. 582–597). Malden: Wiley.
Wagner, J. (2004). Constructing credible images: documentary studies, social research and visual studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1477–1506.
Weber, M. (1919a). Politics as a vocation. From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, translated by H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press, 1958, 77–128.
Weber, M. (1919b). Science as a Vocation. From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, translated by H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press, 1958, 129–156.
Wolff, K. (1983). Beyond the sociology of knowledge: an introduction and a development. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gattone, C.F. The Social Scientist as Public Intellectual in an Age of Mass Media. Int J Polit Cult Soc 25, 175–186 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9128-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9128-1