Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating Quality of Class Talk in Grade 7: the Case of Pattern Generalization

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the quality of class talk during episodes corresponding to different levels of generalization. A total of 10 sessions in two classrooms in grade 7 were videotaped. A mixed approach was adopted to analyze the videotaped sessions. The findings show that triadic dialog was the dominant mode of interaction during class talk. The teacher’s general teaching approach was inductive with a tendency to dialogic teaching, although there were some indicators to univocal class talk. This tendency to use dialogic teaching was due to shifts between generalization level episodes (at a macro level) and among knowledge types within episodes (at a micro level), which influenced the quality of class talk. Besides, the teacher played the role of secondary knower, thus allowing dialogic discourse during class talk. Furthermore, in almost all episodes, it was the teacher who initiated the episodes, and he frequently started the majority of exchanges. Triadic dialog in class talk and the multiplicity of teacher’s roles, as initiator and secondary knower, helped to elicit various levels of generalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. J. (2000). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

  • Amin, T., & Badreddine, D. (2019). Teaching science in Arabic: Diglossia and discourse patterns in the elementary classroom. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1629039.

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by MM Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

  • Barwell, R. (2016). Formal and informal mathematical discourses: Bakhtin and Vygotsky, dialogue and dialectic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(3), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwell, R. (2018). From language as a resource to sources of meaning in multilingual mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BouJaoude, S. B., & Jurdak, M. E. (2010). Integrating physics and math through microcomputer-based laboratories (MBL): Effects on discourse type, quality, and mathematization. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 1019–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, W. (1991). Meaning: Image schemata and protocols. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 17–32). Assisi, Italy: PME.

  • El Mouhayar, R. (2018). Trends of progression of student level of reasoning and generalization in numerical and figural reasoning approaches in pattern generalization. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(1), 89–107.

  • El Mouhayar, R. (2019a). Triadic dialogue during classroom talk in the context of pattern generalization. In M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. Essien & P. Vale (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 224–231). Pretoria, South Africa: PME.

  • El Mouhayar, R. (2019b). Exploring teachers’ attention to students’ responses in pattern generalization tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(6), 575–605.

  • El Mouhayar, R., & Jurdak, M. (2013). Teachers' ability to identify and explain students' actions in near and far figural pattern generalization tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9434-6.

  • El Mouhayar, R. & Jurdak, M. (2015). Variation in strategy use across grade level by pattern generalization types. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.985272.

  • El Mouhayar, R., & Jurdak, M. (2016). Variation of student numerical and figural reasoning approaches by pattern generalization type, strategy use and grade level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1068391.

  • Jurdak, M. & El Mouhayar, R. (2014). Trends in the development of student level of reasoning in pattern generalization tasks across grade-level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9494-2.

  • Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2009). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. Journal of Education, 189(1–2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. (1996). The changing face of school algebra. In C. Alsina, J. M. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde & A. Perez (Eds.), 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education: Selected lectures (pp. 271–290). Sevilla, Spain: S.A.E.M. Thales.

  • Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic thinking in the early grades: What is it? The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

  • Mehan, H. (1979). “What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice, 18(4), 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

  • Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve math problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

  • Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of triadic dialogue? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassbaum, M. C. (1990). Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Phakeng, M. S. (2016). Mathematics education and language diversity: Mathematics education and language diversity. In A. Halai & P. Clarkson (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in multilingual classrooms (pp. 11–23). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

  • Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2006). Algebraic thinking and the generalization of patterns: A semiotic perspective. In S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Sáiz, & A. Méndez (Eds), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North American Chapter (Vol. 1, pp. 2–21). Mérida, Mexico: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.

  • Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM, 40(1), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2010a). Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2010b). Layers of generality and types of generalization in pattern activities. PNA. Revista de Investigación en Didáctica de la Matemática, 4(2), 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L., Bardini, C., & Sabena, C. (2007). Perceiving the general: The multisemiotic dimension of students’ algebraic activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 507–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, F. D., & Becker, J. R. (2008). Middle school children’s cognitive perceptions of constructive and deconstructive generalizations involving linear figural patterns. ZDM, 40(1), 65–82.

  • Ruthven, K., Hofmann, R., & Mercer, N. (2011). A dialogic approach to plenary problem synthesis. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 81-88). Ankara, Turkey: PME.

  • Salloum, S., & BouJaoude, S. (2019). The use of triadic dialogue in the science classroom: A teacher negotiating conceptual learning with teaching to the test. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 829–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9640-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2007). Practical wisdom in the service of professional practice. Educational Researcher, 36(9), 560–563.

  • Siegler, R. S. (2000). The rebirth of children’s learning. Child Development, 71(1), 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalising problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Truxaw, M. P., & DeFranco, T. (2008). Mapping mathematics classroom discourse and its implications for models of teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(5), 489–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truxaw, M. P., & DeFranco, T. C. (2009). Orchestrating whole group discourse to mediate mathematical meaning. In L. Knot (Ed.), The role of mathematics discourse in producing leaders of discourse (pp. 129–151). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Zevenbergen, R. (2001). Mathematics, social class, and linguistic capital: An analysis of mathematics classroom interactions. In B. Atweh, H. J. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 201–215). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is funded by AUB Funds; 14110 Office of the Provost; 11190 Education (Award Number: 102725; Project Number: 21068; grant holder R. El Mouhayar).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

    Rabih El Mouhayar

Authors
  1. Rabih El Mouhayar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabih El Mouhayar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Mouhayar, R. Investigating Quality of Class Talk in Grade 7: the Case of Pattern Generalization. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 1015–1036 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10092-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10092-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation