ABSTRACT
Several studies that suggest for the inclusion of students’ cultural background into the mathematics curriculum fail to address gender roles within cultures and the impact it will have on the understanding of academic mathematics. This paper reports a study of high school students’ involvement in everyday material production and its connection to geometric performance, on 20 students from a rural setting secondary school, in Tigray, Ethiopia. An interview involving six questions each followed by a mathematical question was administered to the group of participating students. The analyses of the interview and the mathematical questions have come up with the following findings: (1) some everyday materials are identified as male-orientated and hence, the male students show better fluency in basic geometry for practical utility which have connections with their domain; (2) some other activities and the production of everyday materials are found as female-orientated and therefore, the female students demonstrated better performance in using basic procedures of geometry for practical utility; (3) both males and females demonstrated an enhanced transformation of the local mathematics into a corresponding global in relation to their domain-orientated activities; and (4) some other activities are found to be well (or equally)-orientated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
REFERENCES
Alro, H., Skovsmose, O. & Valero, P. (2007). Landscapes of learning in multicultural mathematics classrooms. CERME, 5(2007), 1567–1576.
Armstrong, J. M. (1981). Achievement and participation of women in mathematics: Results from two national surveys. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 356–372.
Benbow, C. P. & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031.
Bishop, A. (1988). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 179–191.
Bishop, A. (1991). Mathematics education in its cultural context. In M. Harris (Ed.), Schools mathematics and work. New York: Academic.
Bishop, A. (1992). Cultural issues in the intended, implemented and attained curriculum. In G. Leder (Ed.), Assessment and learning of mathematics (pp. 169–189). ACER.
Bishop, A. (1993). Influences from society. In A, Bishop, K, Hart, S, Lerman, and T, Nunes, (Eds.). Significant Influence on Children Learning of Mathematics (pp. 3–26). Paris, France: UNESCO.
Boaler, J. (1993). Encouraging the School Mathemtics to the "Real World" Through the Interaction of Process and Context, Context and Culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 341–373.
Bush, W.S. (2005, July11). Improving research on mathematics learning and teaching in rural contexts. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(8). Retrieved May 20, 2013 from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/20-8.pdf.
Clements, D. H. & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research in mathematics education (pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan.
Cobb, P. (1999). Where is the Mind? In P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners, Learning, and Assessment (pp. 135–150). London: Paul Chapman publishing in association with the open university.
D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematic. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48.
D’Ambrosio, U. (1990). The history of mathematics and ethnomathematics: How a native culture intervenes in the process of learning science. Impact of Science on Society, 40(4), 369–378.
De Abreu, G. & Gorgorio, N. (2007). Social representations and multicultural mathematics. CERME, 5(2007), 1559–1566.
Deaux, K. & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.
Dolinko, L. (1997). Investigating flags: A multicultural approach. Teaching Children Mathematics, 3(4), 186–190.
Dossey, J. A. (1992). The nature of mathematics: Its role and its influence. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research in mathematics education (pp. 39–48). New York: Macmillan.
Dunn, D. (1988). The beginning of social understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172.
Ernest, P. (1996). Varieties of constructivism: A framework for comparison. In L.P. Steffe & P. Nesher (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning. Chapter 20 (pp. 335–350). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Ethington, C. & Wolfe, L. M. (1984). Sex differences in a causal model of mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 361–377.
Fennema, E. H. & Sherman, J. A. (1987). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement and related factors: A further study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 189–203.
Gay, G. (2002). Culturally responsive teaching in special education for ethnically diverse students: Setting the stage. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(6), 613–629.
Gerdes, P. (1985). Conditions and strategies for emancipator mathematics education in underdeveloped countries. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 15–20.
Gerdes, P. (2001). “Exploring the game of Julirde”. Teaching Children Mathematics, 2, 321–327.
Gold, B. (2011). How your philosophy impacts your teaching. The Mathematical Association of America, 42(3), 174–182.
Goldberg, E. P., Cuoco, A. A. & Mark, J. (1997). A role of geometry in general education. Waltham, MA: Education Development Centre Inc.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E. & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–155.
Izmirli, I. M. (2011). Pedagogy on the ethnomatematics-epistemology nexus: A manifesto. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 1(2), 27–50.
Joseph, G. G. (2000). The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of mathematics (2nd ed.). London: Penguin.
Kuhs, T. M. (1994). Portfolio assessment: Making it work the first time. The Mathematics Teacher Educator, 87(5), 332–335.
Leder, G. (1992). Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research in mathematics education (pp. 597–622). New York: Macmillan.
Leder, G. (2008). “Equity: The case for and against gender.” Paper presented at ICME-11, Monterrey, Mexico.
Levine, D. U. & Orbsteub, A. C. (1983). Sex differences in ability and achievement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 16, 62–72.
Mallory, C. E. (1997). Including African students in the mathematics community. In J. Trencosta & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), Multicultural and gender equity in the mathematics classroom: The gift of diversity (pp. 23–33). Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.
Matang, R. (2002). The role of ethnomathematics in mathematics education in Papua New Guinea: Implications for mathematics curriculum. Journal of Educational Studies, 24(1), 27–37.
Moreira, D. (2007). Filling the gap between global and local mathematics. CERME, 5(2007), 1587–1596.
Moses, R. & Cobb, C. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the algebra project. Boston, MA: Beacon.
Nichol, R. & Robinson, J. (2000). Pedagogical challenges in making mathematics relevant for indigenous Australians. International Journal for Mathematics Education, Science, and Technology, 31(4), 495–504.
Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A. & Viiri, J. (2013). Gender differences in learning of the concept of force, representational consistency, and scientific reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 1137–1156.
Piaget, J. (1980). Adaptation and intelligence: Organic selection and phenocopy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Pinxten, R. (1994). Ethnomathematics and its practice. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 23–25.
Pollard, A. (2002). Reflective teaching: Effective and evidence-informed professional practice. London: Continuum.
Powell, A. B. & Frankenstein, M. (Eds.). (1997). Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education. Albany: State University of New York.
Presmeg, N. C. (1998). Ethnomathematics in teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 317–339.
Rogoff, B. (1999). Cognitive development through social interaction: Vygotsky and Piaget. In P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners, learning, and assessment (pp. 69–82). London: Paul Chapman Publishing in association with The Open University.
Rosa, M. & Orey, D. C. (2010). Culturally relevant pedagogy: An ethnomathematical approach. Horizontes, 28(1), 19–31.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M. & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
Stredder, K. (1999). Cultural bridging and children’s learning. In P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners, learning and assessment (pp. 290–304). London: Paul Chapman Publishing in Association with The Open University.
Vithal, R. & Skovsmose, O. (1997). The end of innocence: A critique of ethnomathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 131–157.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Aspects of radical constructivism and its educational recommendations. In L.P. Steffe & P. Nesher. (Eds.), Theories of mathematics learning. Chapter 18 (pp. 307–314). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zaslavsky, G. (1993). Multicultural mathematics: One road to the goal of mathematics for all. In G. J. Cuevas & M. J. Driscoll (Eds.), Reaching all students with mathematics (pp. 45–55). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Zaslavsky, C. (1994). “Africa counts” and ethnomathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 3–8.
Zaslavsky, C. (1998). The multicultural mathematics classroom: Bringing in the world. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Weldeana, H.N. GENDER POSITIONS AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ATTAINMENT IN LOCAL GEOMETRY. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 13, 1331–1354 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9548-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9548-7