Abstract
This study examines the interrelationships among students’ motivational beliefs (i.e. achievement goal orientations, perception of classroom goal structure, and self-efficacy), use of self-regulated learning strategies (i.e. elaboration, organization, and metacognitive self-regulation strategies), and achievement in mathematics, by proposing and testing a structural model. Participants were 1,019 seventh grade students, enrolled in public elementary schools in Ankara, Turkey. Self-report questionnaires and a mathematics test were administered to participants during their regular class periods. Results revealed that students’ perception of classroom goal structure was significantly related to their adoption of achievement goals. Among achievement goals, only mastery goal orientation was significantly related to use of self-regulated learning strategies and mathematics achievement. Among self-regulated learning strategies, only elaboration was significantly related to mathematics achievement. In addition, self-efficacy was associated with achievement goals, use of self-regulated learning strategies, and mathematics achievement. These results supported many of the hypothesized relationships, and offered additional clarification for the literature. Possible explanations are discussed regarding both the expected and unexpected outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148.
Barron, K. E. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706–722.
Bong, M. (2001). Between and within domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 143–179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
Elliot, A. J. & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.
Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.
Gable, R. K. (1998). Review of Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. In J. Impara & B. S. Plake (Eds.), The thirteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 681–682). Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J. & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 638–645.
Karadeniz, Ş., Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Çakmak, E. K. & Demirel, F. (2008). The Turkish adaptation study of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for 12–18 year old children: Results of confirmatory factor analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 108–117.
Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Law, W., Elliot, A. J. & Murayama, K. (2012). Perceived competence moderates the relation between performance-approach and performance avoidance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 806–819.
Linnenbrink, E. A. & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69–78.
Marcou, A. & Philippou, G. (2005). Motivational beliefs, self-regulated learning and mathematical problem solving. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3 (pp. 297–304). Melbourne: PME.
Mels, G. (2003). A workshop on structural equation modelling: An Introduction. New York: Longman.
Middleton, M., Kaplan, A. & Midgley, C. (2004). The change in middle school students’ achievement goals in mathematics over time. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 289–311.
Middleton, M. J. & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710–718.
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., Gheen, M., Kaplan, A., Kumar, R., Middleton, M. J., Nelson, J., Roeser, R. & Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J. & Yamagata, S. (2011). Separation of performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals: A broader analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 238–256.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.
Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pajares, F. (2001). Toward a positive psychology of academic motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(1), 27–35.
Pajares, F. & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124–139.
Pape, S. J. & Wang, C. (2003). Middle school children’s strategic behavior: Classification and relation to academic achievement and mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 31, 419–449.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.
Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.
Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Erlbaum.
Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H. & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students’ academic efficacy, teachers’ social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 528–535.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J. & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schunk, D. H. (2000). Coming to terms with motivational constructs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 116–119.
Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C. A., Howard, B. C., Hong, N. & McGee, S. (1998). The influence of configurational knowledge on children’s problem-solving performance in a hypermedia environment. San Diego, CA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Skaalvik, E. M. & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Self-concept and self-efficacy in mathematics: Relation with mathematics motivation and achievement. Journal of Education Research, 3(3), 255–278.
Sungur, S. (2004). An implementation of problem based learning in high school biology courses. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
Taş, Y. & Tekkaya, C. (July, 2008). Students’ adoption of personal goal orientations and their perceptions of science classroom goal structures. Paper presented at the Junior Researchers of EARLI, Leuven, Belgium
Taylor, R. T. (2012). Review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) Using Reliability Generalization Techniques to Assess scale Reliability (Doctoral Dissertation). Auburn University, Alabama.
Urdan, T. C. & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524–551.
Usher, E. L. & Pajares, F. (2008). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 443–463.
Webb, N. L. (1999). Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Achieving self-regulation: The trial and triumph of adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education (Vol. 2, pp. 1–27). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice, 41, 64–70.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2005). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fadlelmula, F.K., Cakiroglu, E. & Sungur, S. Developing a Structural Model on the Relationship among Motivational Beliefs, Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, and Achievement in Mathematics. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 13, 1355–1375 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9499-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9499-4