Skip to main content
Log in

Developing a Structural Model on the Relationship among Motivational Beliefs, Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, and Achievement in Mathematics

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the interrelationships among students’ motivational beliefs (i.e. achievement goal orientations, perception of classroom goal structure, and self-efficacy), use of self-regulated learning strategies (i.e. elaboration, organization, and metacognitive self-regulation strategies), and achievement in mathematics, by proposing and testing a structural model. Participants were 1,019 seventh grade students, enrolled in public elementary schools in Ankara, Turkey. Self-report questionnaires and a mathematics test were administered to participants during their regular class periods. Results revealed that students’ perception of classroom goal structure was significantly related to their adoption of achievement goals. Among achievement goals, only mastery goal orientation was significantly related to use of self-regulated learning strategies and mathematics achievement. Among self-regulated learning strategies, only elaboration was significantly related to mathematics achievement. In addition, self-efficacy was associated with achievement goals, use of self-regulated learning strategies, and mathematics achievement. These results supported many of the hypothesized relationships, and offered additional clarification for the literature. Possible explanations are discussed regarding both the expected and unexpected outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, K. E. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M. (2001). Between and within domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 143–179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, R. K. (1998). Review of Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. In J. Impara & B. S. Plake (Eds.), The thirteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 681–682). Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press.

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J. & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 638–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karadeniz, Ş., Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Çakmak, E. K. & Demirel, F. (2008). The Turkish adaptation study of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for 12–18 year old children: Results of confirmatory factor analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, W., Elliot, A. J. & Murayama, K. (2012). Perceived competence moderates the relation between performance-approach and performance avoidance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 806–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink, E. A. & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcou, A. & Philippou, G. (2005). Motivational beliefs, self-regulated learning and mathematical problem solving. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3 (pp. 297–304). Melbourne: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mels, G. (2003). A workshop on structural equation modelling: An Introduction. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, M., Kaplan, A. & Midgley, C. (2004). The change in middle school students’ achievement goals in mathematics over time. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, M. J. & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., Gheen, M., Kaplan, A., Kumar, R., Middleton, M. J., Nelson, J., Roeser, R. & Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J. & Yamagata, S. (2011). Separation of performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals: A broader analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 238–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2001). Toward a positive psychology of academic motivation. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(1), 27–35.

  • Pajares, F. & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pape, S. J. & Wang, C. (2003). Middle school children’s strategic behavior: Classification and relation to academic achievement and mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 31, 419–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H. & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students’ academic efficacy, teachers’ social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 528–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J. & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (2000). Coming to terms with motivational constructs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 116–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C. A., Howard, B. C., Hong, N. & McGee, S. (1998). The influence of configurational knowledge on children’s problem-solving performance in a hypermedia environment. San Diego, CA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M. & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Self-concept and self-efficacy in mathematics: Relation with mathematics motivation and achievement. Journal of Education Research, 3(3), 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sungur, S. (2004). An implementation of problem based learning in high school biology courses. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

  • Taş, Y. & Tekkaya, C. (July, 2008). Students’ adoption of personal goal orientations and their perceptions of science classroom goal structures. Paper presented at the Junior Researchers of EARLI, Leuven, Belgium

  • Taylor, R. T. (2012). Review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) Using Reliability Generalization Techniques to Assess scale Reliability (Doctoral Dissertation). Auburn University, Alabama.

  • Urdan, T. C. & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L. & Pajares, F. (2008). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. L. (1999). Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Achieving self-regulation: The trial and triumph of adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education (Vol. 2, pp. 1–27). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice, 41, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2005). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fadlelmula, F.K., Cakiroglu, E. & Sungur, S. Developing a Structural Model on the Relationship among Motivational Beliefs, Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, and Achievement in Mathematics. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 13, 1355–1375 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9499-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9499-4

Key words

Navigation