ABSTRACT
International assessment data paints a complex picture of the engagement and achievement of New Zealand students in science. New Zealand was second only to Finland in the top achievers group in PISA 2006, but it also has one of the widest spreads in student achievement, particularly in relation to Mori and Pasifika students. Thus, the challenges faced by New Zealand students, teachers, schools and policy makers resonate with those from elsewhere. New Zealand has a strong research and development tradition around student ideas in science education, but recently, there has been increased recognition at the policy and practice level of the importance of both engagement and participation linked to student identity. A sociocultural orientation to identity has the potential to generate new ways of thinking about and responding to the challenge of engaging students in science. This orientation involves considering classrooms as sites for students working through the development and performance of science-related identities, or not. In this paper, three suggestions from long-term research studies are made for ways forward in addressing the challenge of increasing student engagement and participation through an expansion of the possibilities for students to express and develop science-related identities. These are reconceptualising assessment, the inclusion of student funds of knowledge and strategies for breaching the classroom walls.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aikenhead, G. (2001). Integrating western and aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 337–355.
Aikenhead, G., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 539–620.
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Press.
Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388.
Brickhouse, N. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 282–295.
Brickhouse, N., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441–458.
Brown, B. (2006). “It isn’t no slang that can be said about this stuff”: Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96–126.
Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379–394.
Carlone, H. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392–414.
Carlone, H., Cook, M., Calabrese Barton, A., Wong, J., Sandoval, W., & Brickhouse, N. (2008). Seeing and supporting identity development in science education. In P. Kirschner, F. Prins, V. Jonker, & G. Kanselaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of the Learning Sciences: International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World, Part 3 (pp. 214–220). Utrecht: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Cowie, B. (2005). Student commentary on classroom assessment in science: A sociocultural interpretation. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 199–214.
Cowie, B., Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2008). Classroom interactions in science and technology education. Hamilton: WMIER, The University of Waikato.
Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K., & Glynn, T. (2010). Culturally responsive pedagogy of/for learning. Paper presented at AERA, 29 April–4 May, Denver, CO.
Crooks, T., Smith, J., & Flockton, L. (2007). New Zealand National Education Monitoring Project: Science achievement 2007. Dunedin: Otago University.
Fensham, P. (2007). Policy issues for science education. A discussion paper prepared for the World Conference on Science and Technology Education, 8–12 July, Perth, Australia.
Ford, M., & Forman, E. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1–32.
Fredericks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–105.
Gee, J. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
Gipps, C. (1999). Sociocultural aspects to assessment. Review of Educational Research, 24, 353–392.
Glynn, T., Cowie, B., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2008). Quality teaching research and development science hub (Waikato): Connecting New Zealand teachers of science with their Mori students. Hamilton: WMIER, University of Waikato.
Gonzalez, N., & Moll, L. (2002). Cruzando El Puente: Building bridges to funds of knowledge. Educational Policy, 16(4), 623–641.
Hipkins, R., Bolstad, R., Baker, R., Jones, A., Baker, M., Bell, B., et al. (2002). Curriculum, learning and effective pedagogy: A literature review of science education. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, J. (2002). More than ability: Gender and personal relationships influence science and technology involvement. Sociology of Education, 75(4), 349–373.
Lemke, J. (2000). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 247–271.
Ministry of Education (1993). New Zealand Curriculum Framework. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education (2004). Focus on low SES students achievement in reading literacy: Results from PISA 2000. New Zealand: Wellington.
Ministry of Education (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education (2008a). Te Marautanga o Aotearoa. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education (2008b). Ka Hikitia—Managing for success: The Mori education strategy 2008–2012. Wellington: Learning Media.
Ministry of Research Science and Technology (2006). Staying in science: An investigation of factors that encourage students to choose science as a study and career focus. Wellington: Ministry of Research Science and Technology.
Moje, E. (2004). Powerful spaces: Tracing the out-of-school literacy spaces of Latino/a youth. In K. Leander & M. Sheehy (Eds.), Space matters: Assertions of space in literacy practice and research (pp. 15–38). New York: Peter Lang.
Nasir, N. S., & Saxe, G. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: A cultural practice perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 14–18.
OECD (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris: OECD.
Otrel-Cass, K., & Cowie, B. (2008). Early lessons from the use of the New Zealand Science Learning Hub website. Paper presented at ASERA, 2–5 July, Brisbane, Australia.
Otrel-Cass, K., & Bryan, C. (2009). Junior Café Scientifique: A pilot study (report commissioned by the Royal Society of New Zealand). Hamilton: Centre for Science & Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2007). Science, learning, identity: Sociocultural and cultural–historical perspectives. Rotterdam: Sense.
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.
Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Cripps Clark, J. (2008). Engagement in STEM across the primary–secondary school transition: A review of the literature concerning supports and barriers to science, technology, engineering and mathematics engagement at primary–secondary transition. Canberra: Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cowie, B., Jones, A. & Otrel-Cass, K. RE-ENGAGING STUDENTS IN SCIENCE: ISSUES OF ASSESSMENT, FUNDS OF KNOWLEDGE AND SITES FOR LEARNING. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 9, 347–366 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9229-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9229-0