Aleixandre, M. P. J. (1994). Teaching evolution and natural selection: A look at textbooks and teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56, 1891–1901.
Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Author. (2002). Biology principles & applications: A syllabus. San Francisco: McGraw-Hill Primis Custom.
Author. (2008). Disconnections between teacher expectations and student confidence in bioethics. Science & Education, 17(8–9), 921–940.
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika
Bock, R. D. (1997). The nominal categories model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 23–49). New York: Springer.
Brumby, M. N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education
Cummins, C. L., & Demastes, S. S. (1994). Evolution: Biological education's under-researched unifying theme. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford.
Demastes, S. S., Good, R. G., & Peebles, P. (1996). Patterns of conceptual change in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33
Dillon, J. (2008). Discussion, debate and dialog: Changing minds about conceptual change research in science education. Cultural Studies in Science Education
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in Biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constuctivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education
du Toit, M. (Ed.) (2003). IRT from SSI: BILOG-MG, MULTILOG, PARSCALE, and TESTFACT. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software Program.
Ebel, R. L. (1951). Writing the test item. In E. F. Lindquist (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 185–249). Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ferrari, M., & Chi, T. H. M. (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education
Greene, E. D., Jr. (1990). The logic of university students' misunderstanding of natural selection. Journal of Reasearch in Science Teaching
Haladyna, T. M. (1992). Context-dependent item sets. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice
Haladyna, T. M. (1994). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hatton, J., & Plouffe, P. B. (Eds.) (1997). Science and its ways of knowing. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Hewson, P. (2008). Conceptions over time: Are language and the her-and-now up to the task? Cultural Studies in Science Education
Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2000). Educational research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Livingston, S. A. (2006). Item analysis. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 421–441). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
McKinley, R. L. (1989). An introduction to item response theory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 37–57.
Mercer, N. (2008). Changing our minds: A commentary on ‘Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education’. Cultural Studies in Science Education
Miller, K. R. (1999). Finding Darwin's God: A scientist's search for common ground between god and evolution. New York: Harper Collins.
Moore, R., Mitchell, G., Bally, R., Inglis, M., Day, J., & Jacobs, D. (2002). Undergraduates' understanding of evolution: Ascriptions of agency as a problem for student learning. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 65–71.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning (report). Washington, D.C.: National Academy.
Novak, J. D., Mintzes, J. J., & Wandersee, J. H. (2000). Epilogue: On ways of assessing science understanding. In J. J. Mintzes (Ed.), Assessing science understanding (pp. 355–374). New York: Academic.
Oosterhof, A. (1994). Classroom applications of educational measurement (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.
Palmer, D. H. (1999). Exploring the link between students' scientific and nonscientific conceptions. Science Education
Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education
Sadler, P. M. (1998). Psychometric models of student conceptions in science: Reconciling qualitative studies and distracter-driven assessment instruments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Sadler, P. M. (2000). The relevance of multiple-choice tests in assessing science understanding. In J. J. Mintzes (Ed.), Assessing science understanding (pp. 249–278). New York: Academic.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores [psychometric monograph, 17]. Iowa City: Psychometric Society
Scharmann, L. C., & Harty, H. (1986). Shaping the non-major general biology course. The American Biology Teacher, 48, 166–169.
Settlage, J. J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Soderburg, P. (2003). An examination of problem-based teaching and learning in population genetics and evolution using EVOLVE, a computer simulation. International Journal of Science Education
Tamir, P. (1971). An alternative approach to the construction of multiple choice test items. Journal of Biological Education, 5, 305–307.
Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG user’s guide: Multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory (Version 6.0) [Computer program]. Chicago: Scientific Software.
Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1984). A response model for multiple choice items. Psychometrika
Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1997). A response model for multiple-choice items. Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 51–65). New York: Springer.
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Fitzpatrick, A. R. (1989). Multiple-choice models: The distracters are also part of the item. Journal of Educational Measurement
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies in Science Education
Wesman, A. G. (1971). Writing the test item. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 81-129). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Yen, W. M., & Fitzpatrick, A. R. (2006). Item response theory. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 111–153). Westport: American Council on Education.