Skip to main content
Log in

Facilitating Chemistry Teachers to Implement Inquiry-based Laboratory Work

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Science teachers generally find inquiry-based laboratory work very difficult to manage. This research project aimed at facilitating chemistry teachers to implement inquiry-based laboratory work in Hong Kong secondary schools. The major concerns of seven chemistry teachers were identified. They were most concerned about the lack of class time, shortage of effective instructional materials, and the need to teach large classes. To allay teacher concerns, teaching strategies were developed to aid teachers. The strategies include the use of guided inquiry rather than open inquiry, development of ten examples of authentic inquiry, and inclusion of student oral presentations as a key component of the inquiry process. Trials done in schools indicated that these strategies are useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N.G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D. & Tuan, H.L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R.D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backus, L. (2005). A year without procedures. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, G. (2001). Is inquiry the answer? The Science Teacher, 68(7), 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.L., Abell, S.K., Demir, A. & Schmidt, F.J. (2006). College science teachers’ views of classroom inquiry. Science Education, 90, 784–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, D. (2006a). Chemistry teachers’ concerns about implementing inquiry-based experiments. Hong Kong Science Teachers’ Journal, 23(2), 1–7 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, D. (2006b). Inquiry-based laboratory work in chemistry: Teacher’s guide. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong. available at http://www3.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/chemistry/.

  • Cheung, D. & Yip, D.Y. (2004). How science teachers’ concerns about school-based assessment of practical work vary with time: The Hong Kong experience. Research in Science & Technological Education, 22, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costenson, K. & Lawson, A.E. (1986). Why isn’t inquiry used in more classrooms? American Biology Teacher, 48(3), 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deters, K. (2004). Inquiry in the chemistry classroom. The Science Teacher, 71(10), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deters, K.M. (2005). Student opinions regarding inquiry-based labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 1178–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education and Manpower Bureau (2003). Inquiry-based chemistry experiments. Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.

  • Friedrichsen, P.M., Munford, D. & Orgill, M. (2006). Brokering at the boundary: A prospective science teacher engages students in inquiry. Science Education, 90, 522–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furtak, E.M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90, 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallet, C. (1998). Problem-solving teaching in the chemistry laboratory: Leaving the cooks. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, H.L. & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86, 693–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M.W., Goodrum, D. & Rennie, L.J. (2001). The state of science in Australian secondary schools. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 47(4), 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G.E. & Hord, S.M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, K.M. (2000). Performance-based learning and assessment in middle school science. Larchmont, New York: Eye On Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 93–108). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V.N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Shore, R. & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.E., Gott, R. & Jarman, R. (2000). Investigations as part of the key stage 4 science curriculum in Northern Ireland. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A.E. (2000). Managing the inquiry classroom: Problems & solutions. American Biology Teacher, 62(9), 641–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarowitz, R. & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching (pp. 94–128). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechtanski, V.L. (2000). Inquiry-based experiments in chemistry. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, W.H. (1980). Using the extended discretion approach in biology laboratory investigations. American Biology Teacher, 42(6), 338–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, T. & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubben, R. & Ramsden, J.B. (1998). Assessing pre-university students through extended individual investigations: Teachers’ and examiners’ views. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 833–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta, V.N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 249–262). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunsford, E. & Melear, C.T. (2004). Using scoring rubrics to evaluate inquiry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(1), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, J.G. (2000). Teaching investigative science: preliminary theorizing from the shared reflections of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piburn, M., Sawada, D., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I. & Judson, E. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP): Reference manual. Tempe, Arizona: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, S., Hammond, J.W. & Bradshaw, W.S. (2004). Inquiry in the large-enrollment science classroom: Simulating a research investigation. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(1), 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrig, G.H. & Luft, J.A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staer, H., Goodrum, D. & Hackling, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28, 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, H.L, Chin, C.C., Tsai, C.C. & Cheng, S.F. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 541–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann, M.J. & Abell, S.K. (2003). Rethinking laboratories: Tools for converting cookbook labs into inquiry. The Science Teacher, 70(6), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W., Klopfer, L., Aikenhead, G. & Robinson, J. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations. Science Education, 65, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheung, D. Facilitating Chemistry Teachers to Implement Inquiry-based Laboratory Work. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 6, 107–130 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9102-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9102-y

Key Words

Navigation