Abstract
Aligned with recent changes to syllabuses in Australia is an assessment regime requiring teachers to identify what their students ‘know’ and ‘can do’ in terms of the quality of understanding demonstrated. This paper describes the experiences of 25 secondary science and mathematics teachers in rural schools in New South Wales as they explore the changing nature of assessment and its implications on their classroom practice. To help reconceptualise these changes, teachers were introduced to a cognitive structural model as a theoretical framework. Throughout the 2-year study, teachers attended a series of professional development sessions and received ongoing consultative support. Each session was taped and transcribed while interviews were conducted with each teacher at the end of both years. Analysis of these data using a grounded theory approach identified seven major components of teacher practice impacted by the study. The core component was questioning while the six contributing components were teachers’ pedagogical practices, attention to cognition, teaching strategies, assessment linked to pedagogy, classroom advantages for students, and classroom advantages for teachers. These findings represent a major shift in teachers’ perceptions of assessment from a focus on the accumulation of students’ marks to one of diagnosis as a means of directing teaching to enhance students’ scientific and mathematical understandings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, B. & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Sci Educ, 85, 536–553.
Biggs, J. (1995). Assessing for learning: some dimensions underlying new approaches to educational assessment. Alberta J Educ Research, 1, 1–17.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Educ, 32, 347–364.
Biggs, J. & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
Biggs, J. & Collis, K. (1991). Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behaviour. In Rowe, H. (Ed.), Intelligence: reconceptualisation and measurement (pp. 56–76). Melbourne, Victoria: ACER.
Black, P. & Harrison, C. (2000). Formative assessment. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: what research has to say (pp. 25–40). Buckingham, MK: Open University Press.
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ, 5(1), 7–74.
Board of Studies (2003). Assessment for learning in a standards-referenced framework. Board Bull, 12(1), 4–5.
Case, R. (1992). The mind’s staircase: exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Clarke, D. (2003). International comparative research in mathematics education. In A.J. Bishop, M.A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F.K.S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 143–185). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cobern, W.W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 51–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cole, N.S. (1990). Conceptions of educational achievement. Educ Res, 19(3), 2–7.
Collis, K. & Romberg, T. (1991). Assessment of mathematical performance: an analysis of open-ended test items. In C. Wittrock & E. Baker (Eds.), Testing and cognition (pp. 83–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Collis, K., Jones, B., Sprod, T., Watson, J. & Fraser, S. (1998). Mapping development in student’s understanding of vision using a cognitive structural model. Int J Sci Educ, 20(1), 44–66.
Cowie, B. (2005). Student commentary on classroom assessment in science: A sociocultural interpretation. Int J Sci Educ, 27(2), 199–214.
Fischer, K.W. & Knight, C.C. (1990). Cognitive development in real children: levels and variations. In B. Presseisen (Ed.), Learning and thinking styles: classroom interaction (pp 43–67). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Gipps, C. & James, M. (2001). Broadening the basis of assessment to prevent the narrowing of learning. Curric J, 9(3), 285–297.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Goodrum D, Hackling M, Rennie L (2001) The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: a research report. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra ACT.
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hackling, M.W. (2004). Assessment in science. In G. Venville & V. Dawson (Eds.), The art of teaching science (pp. 126–144). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
Halford, G.S. (1993). Children’s understanding: the development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hamilton, L. (2003). Assessment as a policy tool. Rev Res Educ, 27, 25–68.
Hargraves, A. (2000). Educational outomes, modern and postmodern interpretations: response to Smyth and Dow. Brit J Sociol Educ, 21(1), 27–43.
Harry, B., Sturges, K.M. & Klingner, J.K. (2005). Mapping the process: an exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educ Res, 34(2), 3–13.
Linn, R.L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educ Res, 29(2), 4–16.
Maykut, P. & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: a philosophical and practical guide. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
Morgan, C. & Watson, A. (2002). The interpretative nature of teachers’ assessment of students’ mathematics: Issues for equity. J Res Math Educ, 33(2), 78–107.
National Research Council (1989). Everybody counts: a report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Panizzon, D. (2003). Using a cognitive structural model to provide new insights into students’ understandings of diffusion. Int J Sci Educ, 25(12), 1427–1450.
Panizzon D, Pegg J, McGee S (2005) Incorporating different assessment tasks to gauge student understandings of planetary processes. Refereed paper presented at the Annual Conference for the Australian Association for Research in Education in Melbourne, Victoria on 28th November–2nd December, pp 1–18 http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/abs04.htm.
Patchen, M. (2004). Making our schools more effective: what matters and what works. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas Publisher.
Pegg, J. (2003). Assessment in mathematics. In J. Royer (Ed.), Mathematical cognition (pp. 227–259). Greenwich, CT: New Age Publishing.
Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educ Res, 29(7), 4–14.
Skuy, M., Young, S., Ajam, A., Fidjhon, P. & Lomofsky, L. (2001). Instrumental enrichment as a vehicle for teachers in implementing outcomes based education in South Africa. Int J Spec Educ, 16(2), 1–15.
Strauss, A.L. & Cobin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research-grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Swain, J. (2000). Summative assessment. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: what research has to say (pp. 139–157). Buckingham, MK: Open University Press.
Thomson, S., Cresswell, J. & De Bortoli, L. (2004). Facing the future: a focus on mathematical literacy among Australian 15 year-old students in PISA 2003. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.
Treagust, D.F., Jacobowitz, R., Gallagher, J.L. & Parker, J. (2001). Using assessment as a guide in teaching for understanding: a case study of a middle school science class learning about sound. Sci Educ, 85, 137–157.
Watson, J., Collis, K. & Campbell, K. (1994). Developmental structure in the understanding of common and decimal fractions. Foc Lear Prob Math, 17(1), 2–25.
Watson, J., Collis, K., Callingham, R. & Moritz, J. (1995). A model for assessing higher order thinking in statistics. Educ Res Eval, 1(3), 247–275.
Wilson, M. & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: an embedded assessment system. Appl Meas Educ, 13(2), 181–208.
Zevenbergen, R. (2001). Identifying literacy demands of adult numeracy. Literacy and Numer Stud, 10(1/2), 39–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panizzon, D., Pegg, J. Assessment Practices: Empowering Mathematics and Science Teachers in Rural Secondary Schools to Enhance Student Learning. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 6, 417–436 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9084-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9084-9