Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Paving the Pathway: Exploring Student Perceptions of Professional Development Preparation in Doctoral Education

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The breadth of doctoral education has expanded to include professional development activities in order to prepare students for academic and nonacademic careers. This mixed methods study focused on students’ perceptions of professional development opportunities at a Research One university. The findings suggest that most students feel prepared in scholarly-related activities; but they identify gaps in areas such as preparation for grant writing, teaching, and leading research teams. Statistically significant differences in perceived preparation were noted among disciplines. We offer suggestions for future research in doctoral professional development and recognize the need to expand and diversify centralized, institution-based resources so as to pave the pathway to successful careers for graduate students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allum, J., Kent, J., & McCarthy, M. (2014). Understanding PhD career pathways for program improvement: A CGS report. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ampaw, F. D., & Jaeger, A. J. (2012). Completing the three stages of doctoral education: An event history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 53, 640–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. (2011). Preparing doctoral students for promising careers in a changing context: Implications for supervision, institutional planning, and cross-institutional opportunities. In V. Kuman & A. Lee (Eds.), Doctoral education in international context: Connecting local, regional, and global perspectives (pp. 1–18). Serdang, Malaysia: University Putra Malaysia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. J., & Randall, J. (2011). Doctoral student satisfaction: An examination of disciplinary, enrollment, and institutional differences. Research in Higher Education, 53(1), 47–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: Enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., & O’Meara, K. (2014). Faculty agency: Departmental contexts that matter in faculty careers. Research in Higher Education, 55, 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Columbia University Graduate School (2015). Career resources for Ph.D. students. Retrieved from http://www.careereducation.columbia.edu/students/grad/phd

  • Council of Graduate Schools (2009). Graduate education in 2020: What does the future hold? Washington, DC: Author.

  • Council of Graduate Schools (2012). Global perspectives on career outcomes for graduate students: Tracking and building pathways. Washington, DC: Author.

  • Danby, S., & Lee, A. (2012). Researching doctoral pedagogy close up: Design and action in two doctoral programs. Australian Universities Review, 54, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, K. (2010). Creating a community of support for graduate students and early career academics. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, C., Halme, D., O’Sullivan, P., & Lindstaedt, B. (2011). Improving graduate education to support a branching career pipeline: Recommendations based on a survey of doctoral students in the basic biomedical sciences. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10, 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. (2008). Fitting the mold of graduate school: A qualitative study of socialization in doctoral education. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32, 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S., & Barnes, B. (2014). Advising and mentoring doctoral students: A handbook. Seattle, WA: Createspace Independent Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S., & Mendoza, P. (Eds.). (2010). On becoming a scholar: Socialization and development in doctoral education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C., & Dore, T. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today's doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyll, M., Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2003). The effects of incentives and research requirements on participation rates for a community-based preventive intervention research study. Journal of Primary Prevention, 24, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, M., Campa, H., III, & Moretto, K. (2012). Professional socialization for the Ph.D.: An exploration of career and professional development preparedness and readiness for Ph.D. candidates. The Journal of Faculty Development, 26, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, K. (2011). A cultural repertoire of practices in doctoral education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, K., & Caldwell, M. (2012). The challenges of designing and implementing a doctoral student mentoring program. Innovative Higher Education, 37, 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2010). A sociocultural view of doctoral students’ relationships and agency. Studies in Continuing Education, 32, 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2013). Examining non-tenure track faculty perceptions of how departmental policies and practices shape their performance and ability to create student learning at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54, 571–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambie, G., Hayes, B., Griffith, C., Limberg, D., & Muller, P. (2014). An exploratory investigation of the research self-efficacy, interest in research, and research knowledge of Ph.D. in education students. Innovative Higher Education, 39, 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2009). Framing doctoral education as practice. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 10–25). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2009). Identity and agency: Pleasures and collegiality among the challenges of the doctoral journey. Studies in Continuing Education, 31, 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michigan State University Graduate School (2011). Graduate student career and professional development (PREP). Retrieved from http://grad.msu.edu/prep/

  • Nathanson, S., Pepall, L., & Stevenson, J. (2012, December). Professional development programs: Transferrable skills in graduate education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council of Graduate Schools. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cgsnet.org/ckfinder/userfiles/files/AM2012_PDP.pdf

  • National Science Foundation (2013). Survey of earned doctorates. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvydoctorates/#rWP&tabs-1

  • Ostriker, J., Kuh, C., & Voytuk, J. (2010). A data-based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., & Thoenig, J. (2013). Academic institutions in search of quality: Local orders and global standards. Organization Studies, 34, 189–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. (2015, January 12). New jobs on campus: Expanding Ph.D. career options. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/New-Job-on-Campus-Expanding/151105/

  • Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivity—one's own. Educational Researcher, 17, 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (No. 14). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham Graduate School (2015). Professional development courses. Retrieved from http://www.uab.edu/graduate/professional-development-courses

  • University of Virginia (2015). Career development: Office of graduate and postdoctoral affairs. Retrieved from http://gradcareer.virginia.edu/about

  • Vanderbilt University (2015a). Gradleaf: Learn, engage, activate, and foster your graduate professional development. Retrieved from https://my.vanderbilt.edu/gradleaf/

  • Vanderbilt University (2015b). Writing studio FAQs and policies. Retrieved from http://vanderbilt.edu/writing/about/faq-and-policies/

  • Walker, G., Golde, C., Jones, L., Bueschel, A., & Hutchings, P. (2009). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century (Vol. 11). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington University (2015). Career services: Postdoctoral and Ph.D. students. Retrieved from http://careercenter.wustl.edu/students/postdoctoral/Pages/default.aspx

  • Weidman, J., Twale, D., & Stein, E. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(3), 1–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendler, C., Bridgeman, B., Markle, R., Cline, F., Bell, N., McAllister, P., & Kent, J. (2012a). Pathways through graduate school and into careers. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendler, C., Cline, F., Kent, J., & Mageean, D. (2012b). Pathways through graduate school and into careers: Responses to the survey of graduate deans. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, D., & Austin, A. (2004). Future directions: Strategies to enhance paths to the professoriate. In D. H. Wulff & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 267–292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C., Golde, C., & McCormick, A. (2007). More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31, 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Vanderbilt University Graduate Development Network and Graduate Student Council for their support in disseminating the survey; the students for their participation; and Drs. Sinaia Nathanson, Lynne Pepall, and Dawn Terkla of Tufts University for the use of the survey instrument and information on its original use. We would also like to acknowledge the important role of Henry (Rique) Campa and Judith Stoddart in the Graduate School of Michigan State University for their ongoing support of professional development for doctoral students and their continued training for administrators with the Council of Graduate Schools. This survey was funded by an Enhancing Graduate Education grant from the Vanderbilt University Graduate School.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig Anne Heflinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heflinger, C.A., Doykos, B. Paving the Pathway: Exploring Student Perceptions of Professional Development Preparation in Doctoral Education. Innov High Educ 41, 343–358 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9356-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9356-9

Key Words

Navigation