Abstract
The relationship between doctoral students and faculty members has been identified as a key component of a successful graduate school experience. In this article, we consider the challenges inherent in designing and implementing a formal doctoral student mentoring program. By bringing together students, peer mentors, and faculty mentors, the program sought to introduce a team-based platform to facilitate student success. We specifically consider how program components might be scaled up across the institution, providing both a personal and supportive relationship for participants as well as an information resource for the broader student population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, E., & Shannon, A. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38–42.
Bair, C., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Research on doctoral student attrition and retention: A meta synthesis. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research XIX (pp. 481–534). New York, NY: Agathon.
Baird, L. (1995). Helping graduate students: A graduate advisor’s view. In A. Pruitt-Logan and P. Isaac (Eds.), Student services for the changing graduate student population (pp. 25–32). New Directions for Student Services, 72. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Becker, H. (1998). Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bell-Ellison, B., & Dedrick, R. F. (2008). What do graduate students value in their ideal mentor? Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 555–567.
Brown, M., Davis, G., & McClendon, S. (1999). Mentoring graduate students of color: Myths, models, and modes. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 105–118.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Council of Graduate Schools. (2010). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Policies and practices to promote student success. Ph.D. Completion Project. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davidson, M., & Foster-Johnson, L. (2001). Mentoring in the preparation of graduate researchers of color. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 549–574.
Gardner, S. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?” The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350.
Golde, C., & Dore, T. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.
Johnson-Bailey, J. (2004). Hitting and climbing the proverbial wall: Participation and retention issues for Black graduate women. Race, Ethnicity, & Education, 7(4), 331–349.
Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1993). From facts to action: Expanding the graduate division’s educational role. In L. Baird (Ed.), Increasing Graduate Student Retention and Degree Attainment (pp. 27–39). New Directions for Institutional Research, 80. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Paglis, L., Green, S., & Bauer, T. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451–476.
Rose, G. (2005). Group differences in graduate students’ concepts of the ideal mentor. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 53–80.
Weidman, P., Twale, D., & Stein, E. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC higher education report, 28. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holley, K.A., Caldwell, M.L. The Challenges of Designing and Implementing a Doctoral Student Mentoring Program. Innov High Educ 37, 243–253 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9203-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9203-y