Skip to main content
Log in

The Challenges of Designing and Implementing a Doctoral Student Mentoring Program

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between doctoral students and faculty members has been identified as a key component of a successful graduate school experience. In this article, we consider the challenges inherent in designing and implementing a formal doctoral student mentoring program. By bringing together students, peer mentors, and faculty mentors, the program sought to introduce a team-based platform to facilitate student success. We specifically consider how program components might be scaled up across the institution, providing both a personal and supportive relationship for participants as well as an information resource for the broader student population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E., & Shannon, A. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bair, C., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Research on doctoral student attrition and retention: A meta synthesis. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research XIX (pp. 481–534). New York, NY: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, L. (1995). Helping graduate students: A graduate advisor’s view. In A. Pruitt-Logan and P. Isaac (Eds.), Student services for the changing graduate student population (pp. 25–32). New Directions for Student Services, 72. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Becker, H. (1998). Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell-Ellison, B., & Dedrick, R. F. (2008). What do graduate students value in their ideal mentor? Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 555–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Davis, G., & McClendon, S. (1999). Mentoring graduate students of color: Myths, models, and modes. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Graduate Schools. (2010). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Policies and practices to promote student success. Ph.D. Completion Project. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.

  • Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M., & Foster-Johnson, L. (2001). Mentoring in the preparation of graduate researchers of color. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 549–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?” The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C., & Dore, T. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Bailey, J. (2004). Hitting and climbing the proverbial wall: Participation and retention issues for Black graduate women. Race, Ethnicity, & Education, 7(4), 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1993). From facts to action: Expanding the graduate division’s educational role. In L. Baird (Ed.), Increasing Graduate Student Retention and Degree Attainment (pp. 27–39). New Directions for Institutional Research, 80. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Paglis, L., Green, S., & Bauer, T. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (2005). Group differences in graduate students’ concepts of the ideal mentor. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, P., Twale, D., & Stein, E. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC higher education report, 28. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karri A. Holley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holley, K.A., Caldwell, M.L. The Challenges of Designing and Implementing a Doctoral Student Mentoring Program. Innov High Educ 37, 243–253 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9203-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9203-y

Key words

Navigation