Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating and comparing methods for measuring spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia

  • Published:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia using both traditional access measures and the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Ratios of county mammography centers to women age 45 and older, driving time to nearest mammography facility, and various 2SFCA approaches were compared throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, and North Carolina. Closest travel time measures favored urban areas. The 2SFCA method produced varied results depending on the parameters chosen. Appalachia areas had greater travel times to their closest mammography center. Appalachia areas in OH and NC had worse 2SFCA scores than non-Appalachia areas of the same states. A relative 2SFCA approach, the spatial access ratio method, was recommended because it helped minimize the differences between various 2SFCA approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R.T., Yang, T.C., Matthews, S.A., Camacho, F., et al.: Breast cancer screening, area deprivation, and later-stage breast cancer in appalachia: Does geography matter? Health Serv. Res. 49, 546–567 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Appalachia Regional Commision (ARC). The Appalachia region. http://www.arc.gov/appalachian_region/TheAppalachianRegion.asp. Accessed 10 Oct 2014

  • Bhanegaonkar, A., Madhavan, S., Khanna, R., Remick, S.C.: Declining mammography screening in a state medicaid fee-for-service program: 1999–2008. J. Women’s Health 21(8), 821–829 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackley, D., Behringer, B., Zheng, S.: Cancer mortality rates in Appalachia: descriptive epidemiology and an approach to explaining differences in outcomes. J. Community Health 37(4), 804–813 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D.: Black residential segregation, disparities in spatial access to health care facilities, and late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in metropolitan Detroit. Health Place 16(5), 1038–1052 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services. Shortage Designation: Health Professional Shortage Areas & Medically Underserved Areas/Populations. http://www.hrsa.gov/shortage/ (2008). Accessed 15 Oct 2014

  • Freeman, A.B., Huang, B., Dragun, A.E.: Patterns of care with regard to surgical choice and application of adjuvant radiation therapy for preinvasive and early stage breast cancer in rural Appalachia. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 35(4), 358–363 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guagliardo, M.F.: Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. Int. J. Health Geogr. 3, 3 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, K.A., Boscoe, F.P., Johnson, C.J., Goldberg, D.W., Sherman, R., Cockburn, M.: Breast cancer stage at diagnosis: Is travel time important? J. Community Health 1(36), 933–942 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, N., Konrad, R., Ricketts, T., et al.: Health Care Costs and Access Disparities in Apppalachia. Appalachia Regional Commission, Washington, DC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengerich, E.J., Tucker, T.C., Powell, R.K., et al.: Cancer incidence in Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia: disparities in Appalachia. J. Rural Health 21(1), 39–47 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lian, M., Struthers, J., Schootman, M.: Comparing GIS-based measures in access to mammography and their validity in predicting neighborhood risk of late-stage breast cancer. PLoS One 7(8), e43000 (2012). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., Qi, Y.: An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians. Health Place 15, 1100–1107 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., Wang, F.: Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environ. Plan. B 30(6), 865–884 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., Whippo, T.L.: Variable catchment sizes for the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Health Place 18, 789–795 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, L., Nekorchuk, D.: Measuring spatial accessibility to healthcare for populations with multiple transportation modes. Health Place 24, 115–122 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGrail, M.R., Humphreys, J.S.: The index of rural access: an innovative integrated approach for measuring primary care access. BMC Health Serv. Res. 9, 124 (2009a)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McGrail, M.R., Humphreys, J.S.: A new index of access to primary care services in rural areas. Aust. NZ. J. Public Health 33, 418–423 (2009b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrail, M.R.: Spatial accessibility of primary health care utilising the two step floating catchment area method: an assessment of recent improvements. Int. J. Health Geogr. 16, 11–50 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paskett, E.D., Fisher, J.L., Lengerich, E.J., et al.: Disparities in underserved white populations: the case of cancer-related disparities in Appalachia. Oncologist 16(8), 1072–1081 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, K., Jacobson, L.A.: The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2008–2012 American Community Survey. Appalachia Regional Commission. (2014) Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov/research/researchreportdetails.asp?REPORT_ID=109

  • Tao, Z., Cheng, Y., Dai, T., Rosenberg, M.W.: Spatial optimization of residential care facility locations in Beijing, China: maximum equity in accessibility. Int. J. Health Geogr. 14, 13–33 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. Centers of Population. https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/centersofpop.html (2014). Accessed 5 June 2014

  • U.S. Census Bureau. Geographic Terms and Concepts—Place. https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_place.html (2014). Accessed 5 June 2014

  • U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151, 716–726 (2009). W-236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, N., Zhan, F.B., Zou, B., Chow, E.: A relative spatial access assessment approach for analyzing potential spatial access to colorectal cancer services in Texas. Appl. Geogr. 12, 291–299 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F.: Measurement, optimization, and impact of health care accessibility: a methodological review. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 102(5), 1104–1112 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Luo, W.: Assessing spatial and nonspatial factors for healthcare access: towards an integrated approach to defining health professional shortage areas. Health Place 11, 131–146 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, W.B., Kazis, L.E., Shen, Y., et al.: Differences in health-related quality of life in rural and urban veterans. Am. J. Public Health 94(10), 1762–1767 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Cancer Institute and the NIH Office on Women’s Health through Grant 1 R21 CA168479 (Balkrishnan, PI). The authors would like to acknowledge the suggestions of Drs. Kai Zheng, David Hanauer and Maureen Sartor, all at the University of Michigan who were members of Dr. Donohoe’s dissertation committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh Balkrishnan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donohoe, J., Marshall, V., Tan, X. et al. Evaluating and comparing methods for measuring spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 16, 22–40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-016-0143-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-016-0143-y

Keywords

Navigation