Skip to main content
Log in

Computing risk ratios from data with complex survey design

  • Published:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We demonstrate how to apply regression risk analysis to compute risk ratios and risk differences from logistic regression models using complex survey data. We validate the use of regression risk analysis for complex survey design. First, we derive formulas for adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) and adjusted risk differences (ARDs) adjusted for weighting, stratification, and clustering. Then we use Monte Carlo data to show why correcting statistics for complex survey design is important. We show how to calculate and interpret ARRs using a publicly available data set with a binary outcome. Regression risk analysis can be applied to complex survey data to calculate correct ARRs and ARDs from logistic regression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, D.G., Deeks, J.J., Sackett, D.L.: Odds ratios should be avoided when events are common. Br. Med. J. 317, 1318 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Botman, S.L., Moore, T.F., Moriarity, C.L., Parsons, V.L.: Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995–2004. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2(130), 1–31 (2000)

  • Greenland, S.: Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses. Am. J. Epidemiol. 125(5), 761–768 (1987)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, L.C., Norton, E.C.: What’s the Risk? A simple approach for estimating adjusted risk ratios from nonlinear models including logistic regression. Health Serv. Res. 44(1), 288–302 (2009)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korn, E.L., Graubard, B.I.: Analysis of Health Surveys. Wiley, New York (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P.S., Lemeshow, S.: Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, E.C., Miller, M.M., Kleinman, L.C.: Computing adjusted risk ratios and risk differences in Stata. Stata J. 13(3), 492–509 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P.: Sampling Methodologies with Applications. Chapman and Hall, New York (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D.L., Deeks, J.J., Altman, D.G.: Down with odds ratios! Evid. Based Med. 1, 164–166 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., Wretman, J.: Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer, New York (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, L.M., Woloshin, S., Welch, H.G.: Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians’ referrals for cardiac catheterization. N. Engl. J. Med. 341(4), 279–283 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajeu, G.S., Sen, B., Allison, D.B., Menachemi, N.: Misuse of odds ratios in obesity literature: an empirical analysis of published studies. Obesity 20(8), 1726–1731 (2012)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S.D.: Choice of effect measure for epidemiological data. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 53, 931–939 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward C. Norton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norton, E.C., Carroll, N.W., Miller, M.M. et al. Computing risk ratios from data with complex survey design. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 14, 3–14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-014-0114-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-014-0114-0

Keywords

Navigation