Abstract
Negotiations proceed differently across cultures. For realistic modeling of agents in multicultural negotiations, the agents must display culturally differentiated behavior. This paper presents an agent-based simulation model that tackles these challenges, based on Hofstede’s model of national cultures. The context is a trade network for goods with a hidden quality attribute. The negotiation model is based on the ABMP negotiation architecture and applies a utility function that includes market value, quality preference and risk attitude. The five dimensions of Hofstede’s model are the basis for the modification of ABMP parameters and weight factors in the utility function. The agents can observe each other’s group membership and status. This information is used, along with the indices of Hofstede’s dimensions, to differentiate behavior in different cultural settings. The paper presents results of test runs that verify the implementation of the model. The model helps to explain behaviors of actors in international trade networks. It proves that Hofstede’s dimensions can be used to generate culturally differentiated agents. Further validations of the model with case studies from literature and experiments have yet to be conducted. Extensions can make this model a useful tool for training traders who engage in cross-cultural negotiation and for implementation in negotiation support systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adair W, Brett J, Lempereur A, Okumura T, Shikhirev P, Tinsley C, Lytle A (2004) Culture and negotiation strategy. Negot J 20: 87–111
Bosse T, Jonker CM, Treur J (2004) Experiments in human multi-issue negotiation: analysis and support. In: Proceedings of the third international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, pp 672–679
Brett JM, Okumura T (1998) Inter- and intracultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators. Acad Manag J 41: 495–510
Coehoorn RM, Jennings NR (2004) Learning an opponent’s preferences to make effective multi-issue negotiation trade-offs. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on e-commerce, pp 59–68
de Rosis F, Pelachaud C, Poggi I (2004) Transcultural believability in embodied agents: a matter of consistent adaptation. In: Payr S, Trappl R (eds) Agent Culture. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 75–105
Faratin P, Sierra C, Jennings NR (1998) Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robo Auton Syst 24: 159–182
Gelfand MJ, Brett JM (2004) The handbook of negotiation and culture. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Graham JL, Mintu AT, Rodgers W (1994) Exploration of negotiation behaviors in ten foreign countries using a model developed in the United States. Manag Sci 40:72–95
Hindriks K, Tykhonov D (2008) Opponent modeling in automated multi-issue negotiation using Bayesian learning. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, pp 331–338
Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s Consequences. 2. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ (2005) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind, third millennium edition. McGraw-Hill, New York
Hofstede GJ, Jonker CM, Meijer S, Verwaart T (2006) Modeling trade and trust across cultures. In: Stølen K, et al (eds) Trust management: 4th international conference, iTrust 2006. Springer-Verlag, pp 120–134
Hofstede GJ, Jonker CM, Verwaart T (2008a) Individualism and collectivism in trade agents. In: Nguyen NT, et al (eds) New frontiers in applied artificial intelligence, IEA/AIE 2008. Springer-Verlag, pp 492–502
Hofstede GJ, Jonker CM, Verwaart T (2008b) Modeling culture in trade: uncertainty avoidance. In: 2008 Agent-directed simulation symposium (ADSS’08), Spring Simulation Multiconference 2008. SCS, pp 143–150
Hofstede GJ, Jonker CM, Verwaart T (2008c) Long-term orientation in trade. In: Schredelseker K, Hauser F (eds) Complexity and artificial markets. Springer, pp 107–118
Hofstede GJ, Jonker CM, Verwaart T (2009) Modeling power distance in trade. In: David N, Sichman JS (eds) Multi-agent-based simulation IX, international workshop, MABS 2008, Revised Selected Papers. Springer, pp 1–16
Jonker CM, Treur J (2001) An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation. In: Nebel B (ed) Proceedings of the 17th international joint conference on AI, IJCAI ‘01, pp 1195–1201
Kumar R, Worm V (2004) Institutional dynamics and the negotiation process: comparing India and China. Int J Confl Manag 15: 304–334
Meijer S, Hofstede GJ, Beers G, Omta SWF (2006) Trust and tracing game: learning about transactions and embeddedness in a trade network. Prod Plan Control 17: 569–583
Metcalf LE, Bird A, Shankarmahesh M, Aycan Z, Larimo J, Valdelamar DD (2006) Cultural tendencies in negotiation: a comparison of Finland, India, Mexico, Turkey and the United States. J World Bus 41: 382–394
Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A (1994) A course in game theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Raiffa H, Richardson J, Metcalfe D (2002) Negotiation analysis: the science and art of collaborative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Smith P (2004) Nations, cultures, and individuals: new perspectives and old dilemmas. J Cross-Cult Psychol 35: 50–61
Thompson LL (2005) The mind and heart of the negotiator. 3. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Tykhonov D, Jonker C, Meijer S, Verwaart T (2008) Agent-based simulation of the trust and tracing game for supply chains and networks. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 11(3):1 http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/3/1.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M. & Verwaart, T. Cultural Differentiation of Negotiating Agents. Group Decis Negot 21, 79–98 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-010-9190-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-010-9190-x