Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of seed yield and seed yield components in red–yellow (Pisum fulvum) and Ethiopian (Pisum abyssinicum) peas

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Red–yellow (Pisum fulvum Sibth. et Sm.) and Ethiopian (Pisum abyssinicum A. Br.) peas have become of increasing interest to breeders in the last decade, as they have been found to be partially or completely tolerant to various biotic stresses, such as to attack by pea weevil, mildew blight or rust. A trial was carried out at the Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops at Rimski Šančevi from 2005 to 2007, with 13 accessions each of red–yellow and Ethiopian peas sown at 100 viable seeds m−2, in plots of 0.5 m2. Seed yield per plant in red–yellow pea was significantly and positively correlated with seed number per plant (r = 0.881**), pod number per plant (r = 0.839**) and number of fertile nodes (r = 0.820**). The highest positive correlation among the agronomic characteristics in Ethiopian pea was between number of fertile nodes and number of pods (r = 0.937**). Seed yield in Ethiopian pea was highly significantly correlated with number of seeds (r = 0.807**), pods (r = 0.692*), and fertile nodes (r = 0.638*). The results suggest that plant morphology of the progenies between red–yellow or Ethiopian peas and grain-type common pea could not differ significantly from that of individual parents. That means that it could be possible to develop hybrid lines that could keep the desirable morphological traits of grain-type common pea, such as lodging-tolerance and high seed yields, and to make an introgression of a specific resistance from wild pea taxa, especially by back-crosses with the former. However, one must always be aware of unpredicted outcomes as a result of rather different genetic basis of individual seed yield components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdi H (2010) Holm’s sequential Bonferroni procedure. In: Salkind NJ, Dougherty DM, Frey B (eds) Encyclopedia of research design. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 573–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Akopian J, Sarukhanyan N, Gabrielyan I, Vanyan A, Mikić A, Smýkal P, Kenicer G, Vishnyakova M, Sinjushin A, Demidenko N, Ambrose M (2010) Reports on establishing an ex situ site for ‘beautiful’ vavilovia (Vavilovia formosa) in Armenia. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:1127–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne OMT (2005) Incorporation of pea weevil resistance from wild pea (Pisum fulvum) into cultivated field pea (Pisum sativum). PhD thesis. The University of Western Australia, p 150

  • Byrne OM, Hardie DC, Khan TN, Speijers J, Yan G (2008) Genetic analysis of pod and seed resistance to pea weevil in a Pisum sativum × P. fulvum interspecific cross. Aust J Agric Res 59:854–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne CJ, Brown AF, Timmerman-Vaughan GM, McPhee KE, Grusak MA (2005) USDA-ARS refined pea core collection for 26 quantitative traits. Pisum Genet 37:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćupina B, Mihailović V, Mikić A, Erić P, Krstić Đ (2008) Evaluation of seed yield components in Ethiopian pea (Pisum sativum subsp. abyssinicum (A. Braun) Govorov). In: Annicchiarico P, Bochard AM, Ellis N, Mikić A, Ramos Monreal Á, Smýkal P, Warkentin T, Winter P (eds) Book of Abstracts of the Second Grain Legumes Technology Transfer Platform (GL-TTP) Workshop, Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad—GL-TTP, Paris, pp 36–37

  • Ehrman T, Maxted N (1990) Ecogeographic survey and collection of Syrian Vicieae and Cicereae (Leguminosae). Plant Genet Resour Newsl 77:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Errico A, Conicella C, Taliercio U (2006) Cytological and morphological characterization of Pisum sativum and Pisum fulvum tetraploids. Plant Breed 106:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fondevilla S, Ávila CM, Cubero JI, Rubiales D (2005) Response to Mycosphaerella pinodes in a germplasm collection of Pisum spp. Plant Breed 124:313–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fondevilla S, Carver TLW, Moreno MT, Rubiales D (2007a) Identification and characterization of sources of resistance to Erysiphe pisi Syd. in Pisum spp. Plant Breed 126:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fondevilla S, Torres AM, Moreno MT, Rubiales D (2007b) Identification of a new gene for resistance to powdery mildew in Pisum fulvum, a wild relative of pea. Breed Sci 57:181–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fondevilla S, Rubiales D, Moreno MT, Torres AM (2008) Identification and validation of RAPD and SCAR markers linked to the gene Er3 conferring resistance to Erysiphe pisi DC. in pea. Mol Breed 22:193–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jing R, Vershinin A, Grzebyta J, Shaw P, Smýkal P, Marshall D, Ambrose MJ, Ellis THN, Flavell AJ (2010) The genetic diversity and evolution of field pea (Pisum) studied by high throughput retrotransposon based insertion polymorphism (RBIP) marker analysis. BMC Evol Biol 10:44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kosev V, Pachev I (2010) Correlations among some characteristics in field pea. Field Veg Crop Res 47:473–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosterin OE, Bogdanova VS (2008) Relationship of wild and cultivated forms of Pisum L. as inferred from an analysis of three markers, of the plastid, mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55:735–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mattatia J (1977) Amphicarpy and variability in P. fulvum. Bot Not 130:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxted N, Ambrose M (2001) Peas (Pisum L.). In: Maxted N, Bennet SJ (eds) Plant genetic resources of legumes in the Mediterranean. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihailović V, Mikić A, Ćupina B (2004) Botanical and agronomic classification of fodder pea (Pisum sativum L.). Acta Agric Serb 17(special issue):61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihailović V, Mikić A, Katić S, Karagić Đ, Pataki I (2008) Grain yield components in afila (af) lines of field pea (Pisum sativum L.). In: Annicchiarico P, Bochard AM, Ellis N, Mikić A, Ramos Monreal Á, Smýkal P, Warkentin T, Winter P (eds) Book of abstracts of the second grain legumes technology transfer platform (GL-TTP) workshop, Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad—GL-TTP, Paris, pp 98–99

  • Mihailović V, Mikić A, Ćupina B, Krstić Đ, Milošević B (2009a) Genetic resources of field pea in Serbia. Pisum Genet 41:44–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihailović V, Mikić A, Katić S, Karagić Đ (2009b) Forage and dry pea (Pisum sativum) breeding in Serbia. Pisum Genet 41:26–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihailović V, Warkentin T, Mikić A, Ćupina B (2009c) Challenges for forage pea breeders. Grain Legum 52:20–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikić A (2008) Genetic variability of agronomic characteristics of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). MSc thesis. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, p 72

  • Mikić A, Mihailović V, Ćupina B, Jovićević D, Milić D, Krstić Đ (2008) Evaluation of seed yield components in red–yellow pea (Pisum fulvum Sm.). In: Annicchiarico P, Bochard AM, Ellis N, Mikić A, Ramos Monreal Á, Smýkal P, Warkentin T, Winter P (eds) Book of abstracts of the second grain legumes technology transfer platform (GL-TTP) workshop, Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad—GL-TTP, Paris, pp 34–35

  • Mikić A, Smykal P, Kenicer G, Sarukhanyan N, Akopian J, Gabrielyan I, Vanyan A, Sinjushin A, Demidenko N, Ćupina B, Mihailović V, Vishnyakova M, Ambrose M (2010) Achievements in research on vavilovia (Vavilovia formosa (Stev.) Fed.), a legume crop wild relative. Field Veg Crop Res 47:387–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikić A, Mihailović V, Ćupina B, Kosev V, Warkentin T, McPhee K, Ambrose M, Hofer J, Ellis N (2011) Genetic background and agronomic value of leaf types in pea (Pisum sativum). Ratar Povrt/Field Veg Crop Res 48:275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochatt SJ, Benabdelmouna A, Marget P, Aubert G, Moussy F, Pontcaille C, Jacas L (2004) Overcoming hybridization barriers between pea and some of its wild relatives. Euphytica 137:353–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smýkal P, Kenicer G, Flavell AJ, Kosterin O, Ellis THN, Ambrose MJ (2009) Morphological and molecular relationships in Pisum L. Grain Legum 52:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Smýkal P, Kenicer G, Flavell AJ, Corander J, Kosterin O, Redden RJ, Ford R, Coyne CJ, Maxted N, Ambrose MJ, Ellis THN (2011) Phylogeny, phylogeography and genetic diversity of the Pisum genus. Plant Genet Res Charact Util 9:4–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türk M, Albayrak S, Çelik N (2007) Estimates of broad-sense heritability for seed yield and yield components of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Turk J Agric For 31:155–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden NF (2007) Genetic changes accompanying the domestication of Pisum sativum: is there a common genetic basis to the ‘domestication syndrome’ for legumes? Ann Bot 100:1017–1025

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weeden NF, Brauner S, Przyborowski JA (2002) Genetic analysis of pod dehiscence in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Cell Mol Biol Lett 7(2B):657–663

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yücel C (2004) Correlation and path coefficient analyses of seed yield components in the Narbon bean (Vicia narbonensis L.). Turk J Agric For 28:371–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamir D (2001) Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat Rev Genet 2:983–989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeven AC, Zhukovsky PM (1975) Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centres of diversity. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatković B, Mikić A, Smýkal P (2010) Distribution and new records of Pisum sativum subsp. elatius in Serbia. Pisum Genet 42:15–17

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is a part of the PhD Thesis of Aleksandar Mikić, entitled ‘Genetic analysis of hybrid progenies between protein (P. sativum L.) and red–yellow pea (P. fulvum Sm.)’, submitted to the Faculty of Agriculture in Novi Sad.

The results of this research are also an outcome of the following three projects: 1) the Projects TR-20090 and TR31024 of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia; 2) the ECO-NET Project 18817 (2008–2009), between France, Bulgaria, Russia, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina and 3) the Project LEG-HIVER (2010–2011), between France and Serbia.

The accessions of red–yellow and Ethiopian peas were kindly donated by the Institute of Plant Genetics in Poznań, Poland, John Innes Centre in Norwich, UK, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research in Gatersleben, Germany, Interrnational Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas in Aleppo, Syria, and N.I. Vavilov All-Russia Research Institute of Plant Industry in St. Petersburg, Russia.

The authors are sincerely grateful to Noel Ellis and Scott Laidlaw for their essential support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandar Mikić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mikić, A., Mihailović, V., Dimitrijević, M. et al. Evaluation of seed yield and seed yield components in red–yellow (Pisum fulvum) and Ethiopian (Pisum abyssinicum) peas. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60, 629–638 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9862-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9862-2

Keywords

Navigation