Abstract
“We cannot open our eyes to things without distancing ourselves from what we seek. Separation is the price of vision” (de Certeau in Enclitic 7: 24–31, 1983). Yet, what happens when what we see at a distance grabs us, touches us, drawing us closer (Blanchot 1981)? Is this not the experience of film? In this article I argue that modulating distance lies at the heart of perception and filmmaking, palpable tensions in moving closer-to (proximal) and distancing-from (distal) bodies and things, entangling senses across the sensorium in what is called haptic perception and, by extension, haptic cinema. I explore modulation in distancing in revisiting Vittorio De Sica’s Italian neorealist film, Umberto D., a film customarily discussed in optical-ocular terms. En route we experience De Sica’s artistry in conveying ‘instants in life’ and ‘spectral distancing’ and we have a visitation with Agamben’s (2000) gestural cinema which exposes the mediality of film, opening up haptic-ethical thought and expression. In the final section I push toward a phenomenology of film inspired by Merleau-Ponty’s (1968) reversibility in perception and Morris’s (2002) associated ideas of tactile resonance and reverberation. I articulate a phenomenology of filmic-body couplings as lived moments in touch that resonate, reverberate and linger as affective intensities, taking cinema beyond the theater, screen, spectator, image, and representational logics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agamben, G. (2000). Notes on gesture. In Means without end: Notes on politics (V. Binetti, and C. Casarino Trans.). (pp. 49–60). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, G. (2002). Difference and repetition: On Guy Debord’s films (B. Holmes, Trans.). In Tom McDonough (Ed.), Guy Debord and the Situationist International (pp. 313–319). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Aitken, S., & Dixon, D. (2006). Imagining geographies of film. Erkunde, 60, 326–336.
Anderson, B. (2006). Being and becoming hopeful: Towards a theory of affect. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 733–752.
Barker, J. (2009). The tactile eye: Touch and the cinematic experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bazin, A. (1971). What is cinema? Volume 2 (H. Gray, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Benjamin, W. (1985). One-way street and other writings (E. Jephcott, and K. Shorter, Trans.). London: Verso.
Bergson, H. (1913). Creative evolution (A. Mitchell, Trans.). New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Blanchot, M. (1981). The gaze of orpheus and other literary essays (L. Davis, Trans.). Barrytown, NY: Station Hill Press.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Chamarette, J. (2012). Phenomenology and the future of film: Rethinking subjectivity beyond contemporary French cinema. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Connolly, W. (2002). Neuropolitics: Thinking, culture, speed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Connor, S. (2004). The book of skin. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Crang, M. (2002). Rethinking the observer: Film, mobility, and the construction of the subject. In T. Cresswell & D. Dixon (Eds.), Engaging film: Geographies of mobility and identity (pp. 13–31). Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Cranny-Francis, A. (2009). Touching film: The embodied practice and politics of film viewing and filmmaking. Senses & Society, 4, 163–178.
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. New York: Routledge.
Curle, H., & Snyder, S. (2000). Vittorio De Sica: Contemporary perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
de Certeau, M. (1983). The madness of vision (trans. by M. Smith). Enclitic, 7, 24–31.
De Vittorio, S. (2000). De Sica on De Sica. In H. Curle & S. Snyder (Eds.), Vittorio De Sica: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 22–49). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image (H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G. (1988a). Bergsonism (H. Tomlinson and D. Habberjam, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.
Deleuze, G. (1988b). Spinoza: Practical philosophy (R. Huxley, Trans.). San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The time-image (H. Tomlinson and R. Galetta, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Derrida, J. (2005). On touching—Jean Luc Nancy (C. Irizarry, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Dewsbury, J.-D., Harrison, P., Rose, M., & Wylie, J. (2002). Engaging geographies. Geoforum, 33, 437–440.
Dixon, D., & Straughan, E. (2010). Geographies of touch/touched by geography. Geography Compass, 4(5), 449–459.
Doane, M. A. (2002). The emergence of cinematic time: Modernity, contingency, the archive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Doel, M., & Clarke, D. (2007). Afterimages. Planning and Environment D: Society and Space, 25, 890–910.
Elsaesser, T., & Hagener, M. (2010). Film theory: An introduction through the senses. New York: Routledge.
Gibson, J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Gilloch, G. (2002). Walter Benjamin: Critical constellations. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Gustafsson, H., & Gronstad, A. (Eds.). (2014). Cinema and Agamben: Ethics, biopolitics and the moving image. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Inc.
Ingold, T. (2006). Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethnos Journal of Anthropolgy, 71, 9–20.
Irigaray, L. (1993). An ethics of sexual difference (C. Burke and G. Gill, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Irigaray, L. (2004). To paint the invisible. Continental Philosophy Review, 37, 389–405.
Kolker, R. (1983). The altering eye: Contemporary international cinema. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Laine, T. (2006). Cinema as second skin: Under the membrane of horror film. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 4, 93–106.
Levitt, D. (2011). Gesture. In A. Murray & J. Whyte (Eds.), The Agamben dictionary (pp. 79–82). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Manning, E. (2007). Politics of touch: Sense, movement, sovereignty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Marcus, M. (1986). Italian film in the light of neorealism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Marks, L. (2000). The skin of the film: Intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Marks, L. (2002). Touch: Sensuous theory and multisensory media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
McHugh, K. (2009). Movement, memory, landscape: An excursion in non-representational thought. GeoJournal, 74, 209–218.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Eye and mind (C. Dallery, Trans.). In The primacy of perception, (pp. 159–190). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible (A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1969. Cezanne’s doubt (H. Dreyfus and P. Allen Dreyfus, Trans.). Reprinted in A. Fischer (Ed.), The essential writings of Merleau-Ponty (pp. 233–251). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Morris, D. (2002). Touching intelligence. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 29(2), 149–162.
Morris, D. (2010). The enigma of reversibility and the genesis of sense in Merleau-Ponty. Continental Philosophy Review, 43, 141–165.
Noys, B. (2004). Gestural cinema? Giorgio Agamben on film. Film-Philosophy 8(22-July) http://www.film-philosophy.com/index.php/f-p/article/view/790/702. Accessed 19 Mar 2014.
Noys, B. (2014). Film-of-life: Agamben’s profanation of the image. In H. Gustaffsson & A. Gronstad (Eds.), Cinema and Agamben: Ethics, biopolitics and the moving image (pp. 89–101). New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Inc.
Paterson, M. (2009). Haptic geographies: Ethnography, haptic knowledges and sensuous dispositions. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 766–788.
Perez, G. (1998). The material ghost: Films and their medium. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Piepergerdes, B. (2007). Re-envisioning the nation: Film neorealism and the postwar Italian condition. ACME An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6, 231–257.
Seigworth, G. (2005). From affection to soul. In C. Stivale (Ed.), Gilles Deleuze: Key concepts (pp. 159–169). Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Shouse, E. (2005). Feeling, emotion, affect. M/C Journal 8(6), pp. 1–4. http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0512/03-shouse.php. Accessed 7 Mar 2009.
Sobchack, V. (1992). The address of the eye: A phenomenology of film experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Taussig, M. (1993). Mimesis and alterity: A particular history of the senses. New York: Routledge.
Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler, 86B, 57–78.
Woodward, K., & Lea, J. (2010). Geographies of affect. In S. Smith, R. Pain, S. Marston, & J. P. Jones III (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social geographies (pp. 154–175). London: Sage.
Wylie, J. (2009). Landscape, absence and the geographies of love. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34, 275–289.
Zavattini, C. (2000). Some ideas on the cinema. In H. Curle & S. Snyder (Eds.), Vittorio De Sica: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 50–61). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McHugh, K.E. Touch at a distance: toward a phenomenology of film. GeoJournal 80, 839–851 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-015-9650-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-015-9650-6