Abstract
A systematic procedure is followed to develop a set of regularized boundary integral equations for modeling cracks in 2D linear multi-field media. The class of media treated is quite general and includes, as special cases, anisotropic elasticity, piezoelectricity and magnetoelectroelasticity. Of particular interest is the development of a pair of weakly-singular, weak-form integral equations for ‘generalized displacement’ and ‘generalized stress’; these serve as the basis for a weakly-singular symmetric Galerkin boundary element method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Here and in what follows, lower case Greek indices range from 1 to 2, lower case Latin indices range from 1 to 3, and upper case Latin indices range from \(1\) to \(N\). Repeated indices imply summation over their range.
The utilization of both superscripts and subscripts in expressing the components of various quantities is simply a matter of notational convenience.
A summary of certain properties of the Radon transform that are relevant to our procedure are presented in Appendix C.
References
Ariza MP, Dominguez J (2004) Boundary element formulation for 3D transversely isotropic cracked bodies. Int J Numer Methods Eng 60:719–753
Barnett DM, Lothe J (1975) Dislocation and line charges in anisotropic piezoelectric insulators. Phys Status Solidi B 67:105–111
Becache E, Nedelec JC, Nishimura N (1993) Regularization in 3D for anisotropic elastodynamic crack and obstacle problems. J Elast 31:25–46
Bonnet M (1995) Regularized direct and indirect symmetric variational BIE formulations for three-dimensional elasticity. Eng Anal Bound Elem 15:93–102
Bonnet G (2009) A general regularization of the hypersingular integrals in the symmetric Galerkin boundary element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 80:1110–1123
Bonnet M, Guiggiani M (2003) Direct evaluation of double singular integrals and new free terms in 2D (symmetric) Galerkin BEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192:2565–2596
Bonnet M, Maier G, Polizzotto C (1998) Symmetric Galerkin boundary element methods. Appl Mech Rev 51:669–703
Brebbia CA, Dominguez J (1992) Boundary elements: an introductory course. Computational Mechanics, Southampton
Deans SR (1983) The Radon transform and some of its applications. Wiley, New York
Frangi A, Novati G (1996) Symmetric BE method in two-dimensional elasticity: evaluation of double integrals for curved elements. Comput Mech 19:58–68
Frangi A, Novati G (1998) Regularized symmetric Galerkin BIE formulations in the Laplace transform domain for 2D problems. Comput Mech 22:50–60
Frangi A, Novati G, Springhetti R, Rovizzi M (2002) 3D fracture analysis by the symmetric Galerkin BEM. Comput Mech 28:220–232
Garcia F, Saez A, Dominguez J (2004) Traction boundary elements for cracks in anisotropic solids. Eng Anal Bound Elem 28:667–676
Garcia-Sanchez F, Saez A, Dominguez J (2005) Anisotropic and piezoelectric materials fracture analysis by BEM. Comput Struct 83:804–820
Garcia-Sanchez F, Rojas-Diaz R, Saez A, Zhang C (2007) Fracture of magnetoelectroelastic composite materials using boundary element method (BEM). Theor Appl Fract Mech 47:192–204
Ghosh N, Rajiyah H, Ghosh S, Mukherjee S (1986) A new boundary element method formulation for linear elasticity. J Appl Mech 53:69–76
Gu H, Yew CH (1988) Finite element solution of a boundary equation for mode-I embedded three-dimensional fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 26:1525–1540
Li S, Mear ME (1998) Singularity-reduced integral equations for discontinuities in three-dimensional linear elastic media. Int J Fract 93:87–114
Nedelec JC (1982) Integral equations with non integrable kernels. Integr Equ Oper Theory 5:562–572
Pan E (1999) A BEM analysis of fracture mechanics in 2D anisotropic piezoelectric solids. Eng Anal Bound Elem 23: 67–76
Rungamornrat J, Mear ME (2008a) A weakly-singular SGBEM for analysis of cracks in 3D anisotropic media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:4319–4332
Rungamornrat J, Mear ME (2008b) Analysis of fractures in 3D piezoelectric media by a weakly singular integral equation method. Int J Fract 151:1–27
Rungamornrat J, Mear ME (2008c) Weakly-singular, weak-form integral equations for cracks in three-dimensional anisotropic media. Int J Solids Struct 45:1283–1301
Rungamornrat J, Senjuntichai T (2009) Regularized boundary integral representations for dislocations and cracks in smart media. Smart Mater Struct 18. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/18/7/074010
Rungamornrat J, Wheeler MF (2006) Weakly-singular integral equations for Darcy’s flow in anisotropic porous media. Eng Anal Bound Elem 30:237–246
Salvadori A (2002) Analytical integrations in 2D BEM elasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 53:1695–1719
Salvadori A, Gray LJ (2007) Analytical integrations and SIFs computation in 2D fracture mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 70:445–495
Sladek J, Sladek V, van Le A (1998) Completely regularized integral representations and integral equations for anisotropic bodies with initial strains. J Appl Math Mech 78:771–780
Solis M, Sanz JA, Ariza MP, Dominguez J (2009) Analysis of cracked piezoelectric solids by a mixed three-dimensional BE approach. Eng Anal Bound Elem 33:271–282
Ting TCT (1996) Anisotropy elasticity: theory and applications. Oxford University Press, New York
Tran H (2010) A computational procedure for analysis of fractures in two-dimensional multi-field media. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Wang CY (1994) Two-dimensional elastostatic Green’s functions for general anisotropic solids and generalization of Stroh’s formalism. Int J Solids Struct 31:2591–2597
Wang CY (1996) Green’s functions and general formalism for 2D piezoelectricity. Appl Math Lett 9:1–7
Xiao L (1998) Symmetric weak-form integral equation method for three dimensional fracture analysis. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Xu G (2000) A variational boundary integral method for the analysis of three-dimensional cracks of arbitrary geometry in anisotropic elastic solids. J Appl Mech 67:403–408
Acknowledgments
The first author gratefully acknowledges the Vietnam Education Foundation for partial financial support during his study at The University of Texas at Austin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Somigliana’s identity
Consider a homogeneous finite 2D domain \(\varOmega \) as shown schematically in Fig. 3. The boundary \(\varGamma \) of the domain is composed of two parts: \(\varGamma _t\) on which traction is prescribed and \(\varGamma _u\) on which displacement is prescribed (i.e. \(\varGamma =\varGamma _t\cup \varGamma _u\) and \(\varGamma _t\cap \varGamma _u=\emptyset \)). In the absence of body force, the displacement \(u_J\) satisfies the governing equilibrium equation
We will have a need for the displacement fundamental solution \(U_{J}^{P}({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}})\) which satisfies
where \(\delta ({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}})\) is the 2D Dirac delta, and where \(\delta _{IP}\) is a generalized Knonecker delta defined such that \(\delta _{IP}=1\) when \(I=P\) and \(\delta _{IP}=0\) when \(I \ne P\). For future reference we note that the stress fundamental solution follows from the displacement fundamental solution by
Now, multiply Eq. (80) with the fundamental solution and integrate over the domain \(\varOmega \) to find
where \({{\varvec{x}}}\) is the source point of the fundamental problem, and \(dA\) is the infinitesimal area. After integration by parts twice, Eq. (83) becomes
where \(n_\alpha \) is the unit normal to the boundary \(\varGamma \) at point \({\varvec{\xi }}\). Utilizing the equilibrium Eq. (81) and the symmetry property of the material constants (i.e. \(E_{\alpha IJ\beta }=E_{\beta JI\alpha }\)), one obtains an integral equation for the displacement at a source point \({{\varvec{x}}}\) in terms of the data on the boundary, i.e. Somigliana’s identity generalized to multi-field media, as
Appendix B: Demonstration that \(H_{\alpha J}^P n_\alpha = \text{ O }(1)\)
This section establishes that the dot product of the kernel \(H_{\alpha J}^P\) with the normal vector at either the source point \({{\varvec{x}}}\) or the field point \({\varvec{\xi }}\) is regular as \(r\rightarrow 0\). This is demonstrated in a fashion similar to the work of Xiao (1998) for 3D isotropic elastic media, and is included for completeness. For convenience, the expression for kernel \(H_{\alpha J}^P\) (Eq. (16)) is restated as
then the dot product \(H_{\alpha J}^P n_\alpha \) becomes
For purposes of the demonstration, consider a point \({{\varvec{x}}}\) on a (locally smooth) curve \(\varGamma \) as shown in Fig. 4. At this point, introduce a coordinate system \((\xi _1,\xi _2)\) such that \(\xi _2\) is directed along the opposite direction of the normal \({{\varvec{n}}}({{\varvec{x}}})\) to the curve \(\varGamma \) at the point \({{\varvec{x}}}\). In the vicinity of \({{\varvec{x}}}\), \(\varGamma \) can be represented as
where \(f\) is a function to define the curve \(\varGamma \). Then
To proceed, a Taylor expansion of \(f\) about \({{\varvec{x}}}\) is given as
where we used the fact that \(f^{\prime }(0)=0\) since the normal vector \({{\varvec{n}}}({{\varvec{x}}})\) is in the direction of the \(\xi _2\)-axis. Note that \(\xi _1=r\cos \theta \), so Eq. (90) becomes
The combination of Eqs. (89) and (91) leads to the result
Now consider the case of the normal vector at the field point \({\varvec{\xi }}\). With the expression for \(\varGamma \) given by Eq. (88), components of the normal vector \({{\varvec{n}}}\) at the field point \({\varvec{\xi }}\) are as follows
Note that, in (93), the normal vector \({{\varvec{n}}}({\varvec{\xi }})\) is not normalized to become a unit vector yet. The dot product of \({{\varvec{n}}}({\varvec{\xi }})\) and \({{\varvec{r}}}\) becomes
Forming a Taylor expansion of \(f^{\prime }(\xi _1)\) about \({{\varvec{x}}}\), we have
Combining Eqs. (90), (94) and (95), we have
Similarly to the previous case, noting \(\xi _1=r\cos \theta \), Eq. (96) leads to
Appendix C: Radon transform
We provide a summary of certain properties of the Radon transform that are relevant to our development. More details of the Radon transform and its applications can be found in Deans (1983). The Radon transform involves two independent transform parameters: a unit vector \({{\varvec{z}}}\) and a scalar \(p\). In a 2D Euclidean plane, a line \(L\) that is perpendicular to \({{\varvec{z}}}\) and has a distance of \(p\) to the origin of the coordinate system, as shown in Fig. 5, is defined by the equation \({{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {\varvec{\xi }}=p\). Let \(f=f({\varvec{\xi }})\) be a function defined on a domain \(\varOmega \in \mathbb{R }^2\). Then the Radon transform of \(f({\varvec{\xi }})\) is defined as the integral of \(f({\varvec{\xi }})\) along this line, provided the integral exists, i.e.
where \(ds\) and \(dA\) denote infinitesimal length and area respectively, and \(\delta (p-{{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {\varvec{\xi }})\) is the 2D Dirac delta ‘centered’ at the line \({{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {\varvec{\xi }}=p\).
The function \(f({\varvec{\xi }})\) is then given in terms of its Radon transform \(\hat{f}({{\varvec{z}}},p)\) defined in (98) by the inversion formula
in which the outer integration is taken over a unit circle.
Certain useful properties and results of the Radon transform that pertain to our development are summarized below.
-
1.
Shifting property: The Radon transform of a function \(f({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}})\) where \({{\varvec{x}}}\) is a fixed point is given by
$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal R f({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}})&= \int \limits _{\mathbb{R }^2}{f({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}})\delta (p-{{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {\varvec{\xi }})dA} \nonumber \\&= \hat{f}({{\varvec{z}}},p-{{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {{\varvec{x}}}). \end{aligned}$$(100)Then application of the inversion formula (99) for the function \(f({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}})\) gives
$$\begin{aligned}&f({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}}) = \nonumber \\&\ \frac{1}{4\pi ^2}\oint \limits _{\Vert {{\varvec{z}}}\Vert =1}\int \limits _{-\infty }^{\infty }\frac{\partial ^2 \hat{f}({{\varvec{z}}},p\!-\!{{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {{\varvec{x}}})}{\partial p^2}\ln |p\!-\!{{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {\varvec{\xi }}|dp \, ds. \nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$(101) -
2.
For a particular case where the function \(\frac{\partial ^2 \hat{f}({{\varvec{z}}},p-{{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {{\varvec{x}}})}{\partial p^2}\) in (101) is expressed as
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial ^2 \hat{f}({{\varvec{z}}},p-{{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {{\varvec{x}}})}{\partial p^2}=g({{\varvec{z}}})\delta (p-{{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {{\varvec{x}}}) \end{aligned}$$(102)where \(g({{\varvec{z}}})\) is a suitably well-behaved function of \({{\varvec{z}}}\), then (101) becomes
$$\begin{aligned} f({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}})=\frac{1}{4\pi ^2}\oint \limits _{\Vert {{\varvec{z}}}\Vert =1}{g({{\varvec{z}}})\ln |{{\varvec{z}}}\cdot ({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}})|\,ds}. \nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$(103)This special inversion formula plays a key role in our development; while it is readily obtained from standard inversion formulas for the Radon transform, we are unaware of it being pointed out previously in the literature. It is analogous to a result for the 3D Radon transform that is, however, widely known (and in that case is associated with functions \(f({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}})\) having a \(1/r\) singularity where \(r=\Vert {\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}}\Vert \)).
-
3.
The Radon transform of the derivative of a function satisfies
$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal R \biggl (\frac{\partial f({\varvec{\xi }})}{\partial \xi _\alpha }\biggr )=z_\alpha \frac{\partial \hat{f}({{\varvec{z}}},p)}{\partial p}. \end{aligned}$$(104) -
4.
The Radon transform of a 2D Dirac delta is given by
$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal R \delta ({\varvec{\xi }}-{{\varvec{x}}})=\delta (p-{{\varvec{z}}}\cdot {{\varvec{x}}}). \end{aligned}$$(105)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tran, H.D., Mear, M.E. Regularized boundary integral equations for two-dimensional crack problems in multi-field media. Int J Fract 181, 99–113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9823-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9823-6