Abstract
We clarify the significance of quasiprobability (QP) in quantum mechanics that is relevant in describing physical quantities associated with a transition process. Our basic quantity is Aharonov’s weak value, from which the QP can be defined up to a certain ambiguity parameterized by a complex number. Unlike the conventional probability, the QP allows us to treat two noncommuting observables consistently, and this is utilized to embed the QP in Bohmian mechanics such that its equivalence to quantum mechanics becomes more transparent. We also show that, with the help of the QP, Bohmian mechanics can be recognized as an ontological model with a certain type of contextuality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mermin, D.: Physics: QBism puts the scientist back into science. Nature 507, 421 (2014)
Fuchs, C.A.: QBism, the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism. (preprint) arXiv:1003.5209 (2010)
Aharonov, Y., Albert, D.Z., Vaidman, L.: How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988)
Dressel, J., Malik, M., Miatto, F.M., Jordan, A.N., Boyd, R.W.: Colloquium: understanding quantum weak values: basics and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 307 (2014)
Denkmayr, T., Geppert, H., Sponar, S., Lemmel, H., Matzkin, A., Tollaksen, J., Hasegawa, Y.: Observation of a quantum Cheshire Cat in a matter-wave interferometer experiment. Nat. Commun. 1, 5–10 (2014). doi:10.1038/ncomms5492
Bamber, C., Lundeen, J.S.: Observing diracs classical phase space analog to the quantum state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 070405 (2014)
Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables. I. Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952)
Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables. I. Phys. Rev. 85, 180 (1952)
Morita, T., Sasaki, T., Tsutsui, I.: Complex probability measure and Aharonov’s weak value. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013(5), 053A02 (2013)
Gleason, A.M.: Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. J. Math. Mech. 6, 885 (1957)
Kirkwood, J.G.: Quantum statistics of almost classical assemblies. Phys. Rev. 44, 31 (1933)
Dirac, P.A.M.: On the analogy between classical and quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 195 (1945)
Terletsky, Y.P.: On the classical limit of quantum mechanics. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 7, 1290 (1937)
Margenau, H., Hill, R.N.: Correlation between measurements in quantum theory. Prog. Theor. Phys. 26, 722 (1961)
Mehta, C.: Phase-space formulation of the dynamics of canonical variables. J. Math. Phys. 5, 677 (1964)
Johansen, L.M.: Nonclassical properties of coherent states. Phys. Lett. A 329, 184 (2004)
Chaturvedi, S., Ercolessi, E., Marmo, G., Morandi, G., Mukunda, N., Simon, R.: Phase-space descriptions of operators and the Wigner distribution in quantum mechanics I. A Dirac inspired view. J. Phys. A 39, 1405 (2006)
Hofmann, H.: Reasonable conditions for joint probabilities of non-commuting observables. Quantum Stud. 1, 39–45 (2014)
Feyereisen, M.R.: How the weak variance of momentum can turn out to be negative. Found. Phys. 45, 535–556 (2015)
Dressel, J.: Weak values as interference phenomena. Phys. Rev. A 91, 032116 (2015)
Ozawa, M.: Universal uncertainty principle, simultaneous measurability, and weak values. AIP Conf. Proc. 1363, 53 (2011)
Spekkens, R.W.: Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements. Phys. Rev. A 71, 052108 (2005)
Harrigan, N., Spekkens, R.W.: Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states. Found. Phys. 40, 125 (2010)
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Zanghí, N.: Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty. J. Stat. Phys. 67, 843 (1992)
Holland, P.R.: The Quantum Theory of Motion: an Account of the Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Wiseman, H.W.: Grounding Bohmian mechanics in weak values and bayesianism. New J. Phys. 9, 165 (2007)
Feintzeig, B.: Can the ontological models framework accommodate Bohmian mechanics? Stud. Hist. Philos. Modern Phys. 48, 59 (2014)
Kochen, S., Specker, E.P.: The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967)
Schiller, R.: Quasi-classical theory of the nonspinning electron. Phys. Rev. 125, 11001108 (1962)
Bell, J.S.: On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195 (1964)
Bell, J. S.: Introduction to the hidden-variable question. In: B. d’Espagnet (ed.) Proceedings of the International School of Physics, ‘Enrico Fermi’, course IL. Academic, New York, p. 171 (1971)
Wigner, E.P.: On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium. Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932)
Jordan, P., von Neumann, J., Wigner, E.P.: On an algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism. Ann. Math. 35, 29 (1934)
Acknowledgements
We thank R. Koganezawa for his valuable suggestion in the early stage of the work. This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Nos. 25400423, 26011506, and by the Center for the Promotion of Integrated Sciences (CPIS) of SOKENDAI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Some Useful Formulas for the \(\circ _{\alpha }\)-Product
Appendix: Some Useful Formulas for the \(\circ _{\alpha }\)-Product
The \(\circ _{\alpha }\)-product (16) for two operators X and Y on \(\mathscr {H}\) is defined by
with \(\alpha \in \mathbb {C}\). For \(\alpha =1\) and \(\alpha =0\), the \(\circ _{\alpha }\)-product becomes the usual operator product,
whereas for \(\alpha =1/2\) it reduces to the Jordan product [33],
If we put \(\alpha = s + it\) with real s, t, we have
where \([X,Y]=XY-YX\) is the commutator. In particular, for \(\alpha =\frac{1}{2}\left( 1-i\right) \) we find
where \(\{X,Y\}=XY+YX\) is the anti-commutator. In addition, the \(\circ _{\alpha }\)-product has the following properties:
with I being the identity operator on \(\mathscr {H}\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fukuda, K., Lee, J. & Tsutsui, I. Weak Value, Quasiprobability and Bohmian Mechanics. Found Phys 47, 236–255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0054-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0054-3