Abstract
This paper presents a theory of scientific study which is regarded as a social learning process of (working) scientific knowledge creation, revision, application, monitoring (e.g., confirmation) and dissemination (e.g., publication) with the aim of securing good quality, general, objective, testable and complete scientific knowledge of the domain. The theory stipulates the aim of scientific study that forms the basis of its principles. It also makes seven assumptions about scientific study and defines the major participating entities (i.e., scientists, scientific knowledge and enabling technical knowledge). It extends a recent process model of scientific study into a detailed interaction model as this process model already addresses many issues of philosophy of science. The detailed interaction model of scientific study provides a common template of scientific activities for developing logical (data) models in different scientific disciplines (for physical database implementation), or alternatively for developing (domain) ontologies of different scientific disciplines. Differences between research and scientific studies are discussed, and a possible way to develop a scientific theory of scientific study is described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aerts, D., Brokekaert, J., & Smets, S. (1999). Inconsistencies in constituent theories or world views: Quantum mechanical examples. Foundations of Science, 3(2), 313–340.
Aerts, D., & Rohrlich, F. (1998). Reduction. Foundations of Science, 3(1), 27–35.
Brodaric, B., & Gahegan, M. (2006). Representing geoscientific knowledge in cyberinfrastructure: Challenges, approaches and implementations. In A. K. Sinha (Ed.), Geoinformatics: Data to knowledge (pp. 1–20). Colorado: Geological Society of America.
Cleland, C. E. (2001). Historical science, experimental science and the scientific method. Geology, 29(11), 987–990.
Damper, R. I. (2006). Thought experiments can be harmful. The Pantaneto Forum, 22.
De Roure, D., Jennings, N. R., & Shadbolt, N. R. (2003). The semantic grid: A future e-science infrastructure. In F. Berman, G. Fox, & T. Hey (Eds.), Grid computing—Making the global infrastructure a reality (pp. 437–470). England: Wiley.
Dieks, D., & De Regt, H. W. (1998). Reduction and understanding. Foundations of Science, 3(1), 173–188.
Farrell, R. P., & Hooker, C. A. (2009). Error, error-statistics and self-directed anticipative learning. Foundations of Science, 14(4), 249–271.
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (1996). Research methods in the social sciences. London: Arnold Press.
Gauch, H. C. (2003). Scientific method in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hars, A. (2001). Designing scientific knowledge infrastructures: The contribution of epistemology. Information Systems Frontiers, 3(1), 63–71.
Hartmann, S. (1996). The world as a process: Simulations in the natural and social sciences. In R. Hegselmann, U. Mueller, & K. G. Troitzsch (Eds.), Modeling and simulation in the social sciences from the philosophy of science point of view (pp. 77–100). London: Kluwer.
Hennig, C. (2010). Mathematical models and reality: A constructivist perspective. Foundations of Science, 15(1), 29–48.
Hoffer, J. A., Prescott, M. B., & McFadden, F. R. (2002). Modern database management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
Humphreys, P. (1995). Computational empiricism. Foundations of Science, 1(1), 119–130.
Kingston, J. (2002). Merging top level ontologies for scientific knowledge management. In Proceedings of the AAAI workshop on ontologies and the semantic web, Edmonton, Canada.
Kosso, P. (2007). Scientific understanding. Foundations of Science, 12(2), 173–188.
Lakatos, I. (1977). The methodology of scientific research programmes. J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Liu, C. (2004). Laws and models in a theory of idealization. Syntheses, 138(3), 363–385.
Ludäscher, M., Lin, K., Bowers, S., Jaeger-Frank, E., Brodaric, B., & Baru, C. (2006). Managing scientific data: From data integration to scientific workflows. In A. K. Sinha (Ed.), Geoinformatics: Data to knowledge (pp. 109–130). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
Luk, R. W. P. (2010). Understanding scientific study via process modeling. Foundations of Science, 15(1), 49–78.
Magnani, L. (1999). Withdrawing unfalsifiable hypothesis. Foundations of Science, 4(2), 257–268.
Marquis, J.-P. (1991). Approximations and truth space. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 20(4), 375–401.
McMullin, E. (1985). Galilean idealization. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 16, 247–273.
Meyer, W. J. (1985). Concepts of mathematical modeling. New York: McGraw Hill.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.
Niiniluoto, I. (1987). Truthlikeness. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Nowak, L. (1972). Laws of science, theories, measurement. Philosophy of Science, 39(4), 533–548.
Pierce, C. S. (1878). Deduction, induction and abduction. Popular Science Monthly, 13, 470–782.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Pratten, S. (2007). The scope of ontological theorising. Foundations of Science, 12(3), 235–256.
Rainville, S., Thompson, J. K., Myers, E. G., Brown, J. M., Dewey, M. S., Kessler, E. G, Jr, et al. (2005). A direct test of E = mc 2. Nature, 438(22), 1096–1097.
Regopoulos, M. (1966). The principle of causation as a basis of scientific method. Management Science, 12(8), C135–C139.
Saracevic, T., & Kantor, P. B. (1997). Studying the value of library and information services. Part II. Methodology and taxonomy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(6), 543–563.
Silberschatz, A., Korth, H. F., & Sudarshan, S. (2005). Database system concepts (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Soldatova, L. N., & King, R. D. (2006). An ontology of scientific experiments. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 3(11), 795–803.
Weber, E. (2004). Rationality in the discovery of empirical law. Foundations of Science, 4(3), 356–368.
Weston, T. (1987). Approximate truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 16(2), 203–227.
Wiezenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36–45.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Dr. Edward Dang and the anonymous reviewers for the constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luk, R.W.P. A Theory of Scientific Study. Found Sci 22, 11–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9435-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9435-x