Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLA,volume 23))

Abstract

Simulation techniques, especially those implemented on a computer, are frequently employed in natural as well as in social sciences with considerable success. There is mounting evidence that the “model-building era” (J. Niehans) that dominated the theoretical activities of the sciences for a long time is about to be succeeded or at least lastingly supplemented by the “simulation era” . But what exactly are models? What is a simulation and what is the difference and the relation between a model and a simulation? These are some of the questions addressed in this article. I maintain that the most significant feature of a simulation is that it allows scientists to imitate one process by another process. “Process” here refers solely to a temporal sequence of states of a system. Given the observation that processes are dealt with by all sorts of scientists, it is apparent that simulations prove to be a powerful interdisciplinarily acknowledged tool. Accordingly, simulations are best suited to investigate the various research strategies in different sciences more carefully. To this end, I focus on the function of simulations in the research process. Finally, a somewhat detailed case-study from nuclear physics is presented which, in my view, illustrates elements of a typical simulation in physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achinstein, P. (1968) Concepts of Science. The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P.W., Arrow, K., and Pines, D. (eds.) (1988) The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barger, V., Gottschalk, T. and Halzen, F. (eds.) (1986) Physics Simulations at High Energy. World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, J., and Tipler, F. (1986) The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, K., and Heermann, D. (1988) Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics. Springer, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blättel, B., Koch, V., and Mosel, U. (1993) Transport-Theoretical Analysis of Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions. Reports on Progress in Physics, 56, p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, R.B. (1964) Scientific Explanation. Cambridge UP, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1967) Scientific Research II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M (1969) Analogy, Simulation, Representation. Revue internationale de philosophie, 87, pp. 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1973) Method, Model, and Matter. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1939) Foundations of Logic and Mathematics. International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science 1, No. 3. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N., Shomar, T., and Suárez, M. (1995) The Tool Box of Science: Tools for the Building of Models with a Superconductivity Example. In [Herfel et al., 1995], pp. 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Marchi, N., and Blaug, M. (1991) Appraising Economic Theories. Billing and Sons, Worcester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M., and Schuster, P. (1979) The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural SelfOrganization. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A. (1986) The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P. (1987) How Experiments End. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. (1988) Explaining Science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guetzkow, H., Kotler, P., and Schultz, R. (eds.) (1972) Simulations in Social and Administrative Science: Overview and Case-Examples. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1983) Representing and Intervening. Cambridge UP, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, S. (1995) Models as a Tool for Theory-Construction: Some Strategies of Preliminary Physics. In [Herfel et al., 1995], pp. 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. (1992) The Inexact and Separate Science Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrich, R. (1990) Komplexe und fundamentale Strukturen. Grenzen des Reduktionismus. B.I. Verlag, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herfel, W., Krajewski, W., Niiniluoto, I. and Wójcicki, R. (eds.) (1995) Theories and Models in Scientific Processes (= Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 44). Rodopi, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, C., and Hermann, M. (1972) An Attempt to Simulate the Outbreak of World War I. In [Guetzkow et al., 1972], pp. 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. (1970) Models and Analogies in Science. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyningen-Huene, P., and Hirsch, G. (eds.) (1988) Wozu Wissenschaftsphilosophie? de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P.W. (1991) Computer Simulations. In A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds.), PSA 1990, 2, pp. 497–506, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (1994) Numerical Experimentation. In P. Humphreys (ed.), Patrick Suppes: Scientific Philosopher, 2, pp. 103–121, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (1995) Computational Empiricism. Foundations of Science, 1, pp. 119– 130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kippenhahn, R., and Weigert, A. (1991) Stellar Structure and Evolution. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laymon, R. (1985) Idealizations and the Testing of Theories by Experimentation. In P. Achinstein, O. Hannaway (eds.), Observation, Experiment, and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, pp. 127–146, Cambridge, Mass..

    Google Scholar 

  • Laymon, R. (1991) Computer Simulations, Idealizations and Approximations. In A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds.), PSA 1990, 2, pp. 519–534, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leatherdale, W.H. (1974) The Role of Analogy, Model and Metaphor. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, H. (1993) A Note on Fundamental Theory and Idealization in Economics and Physics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44, pp. 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1961) The Structure of Science. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehans, J. (1990) History of Economic Thought. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. (1995) The Cognitive Interplay between Theories and Models: The Case of 19th Century Optics. In [Herfel et al., 1995], pp. 105–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, M. (1980) Models in Physics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 31, pp. 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich, F. (1991) Computer Simulation in the Physical Sciences. In A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds.), PSA 1990, 2, pp. 507–518, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, R. and Sullivan, E. (1972) Developments in Simulation in Social and Administrative Science. In [Guetzkow et al., 1972], pp. 3–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1981) The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1970) Administrative Behavior. A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organization. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. (1994) Economics in the Laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp. 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1969) A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences. Synthese, 12, pp. 287–301.Reprinted in H. Freudenthal (ed.), The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences, pp. 163–177, Dordrecht, 1961, and in P. Suppes, Studies in the Methodology and the Foundations of Science, pp. 10–23, Dordrecht, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. (1884) Notes of Lectures on Molecular Dynamics and the Wave Theory of Light. Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1953) The Philosophy of Science — An Introduction. Harper, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1978) Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, A. (1986) Some Lessons of Renormalization Theory. In J. de Boer, E. Dal and O. Ulfbeck (eds.), The Lesson of Quantum Theory, pp. 201–226, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S. (1994) Cellular Automata and Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartmann, S. (1996). The World as a Process. In: Hegselmann, R., Mueller, U., Troitzsch, K.G. (eds) Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View. Theory and Decision Library, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8686-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8686-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4722-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8686-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics