Abstract
The possibility of trade-offs in road tunnel design incorporating suppression has been evaluated. Different tunnel configurations and ventilation conditions is considered to identify potential trade-offs, offering options of design alternatives for future substantial cost-benefit savings. Suppression systems are regularly used in Australia and Japan, and the interest regarding suppression systems in tunnels are growing in the rest of the world and slowly getting implemented in tunnels in Europe and other continents. Due to changes for instance in research regarding the acceptable design fire size and the growing focus on the fire safety in tunnels in general around the world, there is an opportunity of introducing trade-offs in tunnel design incorporating suppression systems. Possible trade-offs has been identified and outlined using risk based comparison approach as part of an evaluative process considering relevant safety objectives. Reliability of suppression systems is shown to be an important aspect, as well as the behavior of tunnel users. One may argue that suppression systems should always be considered as a primary option in tunnel design to achieve a desirable level of safety, enable fire brigade intervention and limit any costs associated with a tunnel fire. As an additional benefit to suppression systems offer the opportunity of potential trade-offs, opening a window of more innovative solutions and cost-benefit approaches compared to traditional prescriptive tunnel safety design. Residual value of this evaluative work and its conclusions shows that, when incorporating trade-offs, aspects like ‘point of no return’, visibility and consequences of trade-offs in the event of suppression system failure must be addressed from a fire engineering and risk management point of view.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
2004/54/EC Directive (2004) Directive 2004/54/EC of the EUROPEAN parliament. Off J Eur Union
Beard A, Carvel R (2005) The handbook of tunnel fire safety. Thomas Telford publication, Edinburgh
Eurocode 2 (2004) Design of concrete structures—part 1–2. General rules—structural fire design. (BS EN 1992-1-2:2004)
FIT (2004) Fire in tunnels—design fire scenarios, technical report part 1. European thematic network fire in tunnels—Alfred Haak Stuva
ITA (2004) Guidelines for structural fire resistance for road tunnels. International Tunneling Association, Lausanne
ISTSS (2008) Proceedings from the third international symposium on tunnel safety and security. SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Stockholm
NFPA 101 (2006) NFPA 101 life safety code. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy
NFPA 502 (2008) Standard for road tunnels, bridges, and other limited access highways. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, 2008
PIARC (2004) Fire and smoke control in road tunnels. PIARC-World Road Association, Paris
RTA (2006) Road tunnel design guideline. Road and Traffic Authority, Australia
PIARC (2008) Road tunnels: an assessment of fixed fire fighting systems. World Road Association, la defense Cedex
SOLIT (2007) Safety of life in tunnels. FOGTEC Brandscutz Gmbh & Co, Köln
Mashimo H (2002) State of the road tunnel safety technology in Japan. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 18: 113–118
Liu ZG, et al (2007) NRC-CNRC.National Research Council Canada, Orlando, pp. 1–10. (NRCC—49232)
Marioff/HI-FOG (2008) Tunnel fire protection ISTSS. Marioff Corporation Oy, Vantaa
Vasilovska M (2006) Effective use of deluge suppression systems in road tunnels and their impact on life safety and property protection. BHR Group, Edgecliff, pp 143–157
Bafsa (2006) Sprinklers for safety, uses and benefits of incorporating sprinklers in building and structures. Bafsa—a report by Arup Fire, Cambridgeshire
Blomqvist J, Isaksson S (2002) Larm-och släcksystem. [book auth.] Blomqvist J, Delin M mfl Bengtson S. Brandskyddshandboken Rapport 3117. Brandteknik, Lunds Tekniska Högskola, Lund, pp 239–252. http://www.brand.lth.se
Ejvegård R (2003) Vetenskaplig metod. Studentlitteratur, Malmö (Scientific method, Published: https://www.studentlitteratur.se)
Backman J (2008) Rapporter och Uppsatser. Studentlitteratur, Lund (Reports and essays, Published: https://www.studentlitteratur.se)
UPTUN WP2 Report (2008) Fire scenarios and accidents in the past
Promat tunnel (2008) http://www.promat-tunnel.com/en/fire-curves.htm. Accessed 17 Dec 2008
http://www.promat-tunnel.com/en/fire-curves.htm. Accessed 17 Dec 2008
Hewitt J, McPhail N, Johnson P (2005) Fire safety design for a tunnel incorporating a zoned deluge suppression system, an Australian experienced. In: NFPA World safety conference & exposition—tunnel fixed fire suppression. National Fire Protection Association, Las Vegas
UPTUN (2006) Engineering guidance for water based fire fighting system for the protection of tunnels and sub surface facilities—Revision 5. Work Package 2.5 of the Research Project UPTUN of the European Commission D251
Johnson P et al (2009) Suppression systems in road tunnels—savings in ventilation systems? New Brunswick
Nystedt F (2003) Deaths in residential fires—an analysis of appropriate fire safety measures. Licentiate thesis, Department of Fire Safety Engineering, Lund (Published: http://www.brand.lth.se/publications/#0)
Aralt TT, Nilsen AR (2008) Automatic fire detection in road traffis tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24:75–83
Huijben JW (2005) Application of transportation tunnel fixed fire fighting systems in the Netherlands. In: NFPA World safety conference & exposition—tunnel fixed fire suppression. National Fire Protection Association, Las Vegas
Johnson P, Barber D (2008) The Burnley tunnel fire—implications for current design practice. In: Third international symposium on tunnel safety and security. SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Stockholm, pp 107–117
Stroeks R (2001) Sprinklers in Japanese road tunnels—final report. Chiyoda Engineering Consultants Co., Ltd., Tokyo. Project Report BFA-10012
Carvel R (2008) Design fires for tunnel water mist suppression systems. In: Third international symposium on tunnel safety and security, Stockholm. SP Report 2008:11
Wu Y, Baker MZA (2000) Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires using longitudunal ventilation systems—a study of the critical velocity. Fare Saf J 35:363–390
Johnson P, Barber D (2007) Burnley tunnel fire—the Arup View. www.arup.com.
Opstad K, Stensaas JP (2006) Fire mitigation measures. In: Safe & reliable tunnels-innovative European achivements—second international symposium, Lausanne
Mawhinney JR (2002) A critical discussion of claims of smoke scrubbing by water mist. In: International water mist conference. Hughes Associates, Inc., Amsterdam
Agnew N, Allen B (2008) Full scale car burns in the Syndey harbour tunnel. Maunsell Aecom—Sydney Harbour Tunnel
Ejrup A-M (2011) Analysis of design options and trade-offs for road tunnels incorporating suppression systems. Department of Fire Safety Engineering, Lund. Report 5305 (published: http://www.brand.lth.se/publications/#0)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ejrup, AM. Towards Design Options and Trade-offs for Road Tunnels Incorporating Suppression Systems. Fire Technol 50, 545–563 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-012-0313-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-012-0313-6