Skip to main content

Potential Risks Assessment Method Using the Model Tunnel Associated with Japanese Expressway Tunnel Fires

  • Conference paper
The Proceedings of 11th Asia-Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology (AOSFST 2018)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1459 Accesses

Abstract

A road tunnel is an enclosed space where backlayering of smoke produced by a fire can extend its damage beyond the part exposed to the fire. To realize a worry-free and safe infrastructure, emergency facilities in tunnels must be improved. Since it is difficult to uniformly apply improvement projects to all tunnels in the face of limited project budgets, it is necessary to prioritize projects to perform improvements systematically. As a method of efficiently conducting these projects, a statistical risk calculation method based on fire accident statistics obtained by defining individual tunnel fire accident risk as “(probability of occurrence of fire in a tunnel) × (loss),” has been proposed. This permits ranking the risk, allowing to set risk improvement project priorities. But to clarify risk improvement effects, medium to long-term observations are necessary. For human loss, which is the loss with the greatest impact on risk, a method of calculating change of potential risk by fire simulation and evacuation simulation has been proposed. But in order to calculate the potential risk of many tunnels, vast computing resources and long periods of time are needed. Therefore, another method was studied, using the results from a model tunnel, and performing evaluations linking fire simulations with evacuation simulations under a variety of conditions as a database. This paper introduces a potential risk calculation method suitable for individual tunnels based on the results of multiple regression analysis performed using these data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

R :

Risk

P :

Probability

P t :

Probability of tunnel fire (cases/year)

P f :

Probability of tunnel fire due to traffic accident (cases/year)

P b :

Probability of tunnel fire due to vehicle breakdown (cases/year)

L :

Tunnel length (m)

H v :

Large vehicle mixing rate (vehicles/day)

E :

Portal elevation (m)

S :

Difference from the nationwide expressway tunnel average traffic speed(km/h)

F T :

Traffic pattern factor (Two ways: 1, One way: 0)

L D :

Death loss amount (yen/person)

L d :

Injury loss amount (yen/person)

I :

Impact (Loss)

HRR:

Heat release rate (MW)

T e :

Evacuation start time (s)

D e :

Distance between emergency exits (m)

S e :

Evacuation walking speed (m/s)

i :

Inclination (%)

W s :

Wind speed (m/s)

E x :

Number of exits

N :

Number of residual evacuees

N o :

Number of residual evacuees for object tunnel

T o :

Traffic volume of object tunnel

T m :

Traffic volume of model tunnel

n c :

Conversion factor for number of residual evacuees

References

  1. Directive 2004/54/EC Of European Parlament and of the Council of 29 April, 2004 on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the trans-European road network. Official Journal of the European Union, L167 of 30 April 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yamazaki, T. et.al. (2015) Study on the potential risks analysis approach for tunnel fires in expressway tunnels. Journal of JSCE, F2, 71(1), 31–46 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kawabata, N., et al. (1999). Numerical simulation of thermal fumes induced by fire accidents in tunnels. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, B65(634), 1870–1877. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kikumoto, T., et al. (2007). Characteristic of plume behavior in a small section road tunnel only for passenger cars (A study by numerical simulation). Journal of JSCE, F, 63(4), 448–459. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Seike, M. et.al. (2014) Assessment method for road tunnel fire safety by evacuation simulation of smoke behavior from CFD analysis. Journal of JSCE, F2, 70(1), 1–12 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. (2013). Survey report on economic analysis of damage/loss from traffic accidents, pp. 92 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Yokota .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yokota, M., Yamazaki, T., Kawabata, N., Imai, S. (2020). Potential Risks Assessment Method Using the Model Tunnel Associated with Japanese Expressway Tunnel Fires. In: Wu, GY., Tsai, KC., Chow, W.K. (eds) The Proceedings of 11th Asia-Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology. AOSFST 2018. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9139-3_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9139-3_71

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9138-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9139-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics