Skip to main content
Log in

Workplace Privacy: Employee Relations and Legal Implications of Monitoring Employee E-mail Use

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tradeoff between employees’ workplace privacy and employers’ need to protect company assets, safeguard proprietary information, and avoid costly litigation has been receiving increased attention (Lee and Kleiner 2003; Mello 2003; National Workplace Institute 2004). This tradeoff often favors employers, as the legal system provides much leeway for employers to monitor employees’ electronic communications in the workplace. However, employers need to consider the effect such monitoring has on their employees since employee and employer attitudes about monitoring often diverge. In this article, we explore workplace email monitoring from both employee relations and legal perspectives and discuss implications for employee morale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose, M. L., & Cropanzano, R. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: An examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker v. GTE.NET LLC. (2003). 350 F. 3d 515 (6th Cir.).

  • Cal Const. Article I, Section 1.

  • Culnan, M., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10, 104–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, E. R., Stone, D. L., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1999). The effects of information management policies on reactions to human resource information systems: An integration of privacy and procedural justice perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 52(2), 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (2005). 18 U.S.C. Section 2510 et seq.

  • Electronic Monitoring and Surveillance Survey (2005). American Management Association and epolicy Institute Research. Retrieved from http://www.amanet.org/research/pdfs/EMS_summary05.pdf.

  • Esen, E. (2005). Workplace privacy poll findings. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, C. S. (2004). Surveillance, records and computers: Technology and the internet: The impending destruction of privacy by betrayers, grudgers, snoops, spammers, corporations, and the media. George Washington Law Review, 72, 1503–1555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, J. T. A., & Mansfield, N. R. (2003). The information revolution and its impact on the employment relationship: An analysis of the cyberspace workplace. American Business Law Journal, 40, 301–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, M. S. (2005). Think before you type: A look at email privacy in the workplace. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 11(1), 115–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, N. J. (2003). Labor law for managers of non-union employees in traditional and cyber workplaces. American Business Law Journal, 40(4), 827–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasprogata, G., King, N. J., & Pillay, S. (2004). Regulation of electronic monitoring: Identifying fundamental principles of employee privacy through a comparative study of data privacy legislation in the European Union, United States and Canada. Stanford Technology Law Review, 4. Retrieved from http://stlr.standford.edu/STLR/Articles/04_STLR_4.

  • Lee, S., & Kleiner, B. H. (2003). Electronic surveillance in the workplace. Management Research News, 26(4), 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrangelo, P. M., & Popovich, P. M. (2000). Employees’ attitudes toward drug testing, perceptions of organizational climate, and withdrawal from the employer. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mello, J. A. (2003). The evolving nature of the employment relationship: Reconsidering employee responsibilities and rights. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 15, 99–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muick v. Glenayre electronics. (2002). 280 F.3d 741 (7th Cir.).

  • National Workplace Institute (2004). Report privacy under siege: Electronic monitoring in the workplace.

  • Pearce, J. A., & Kuhn, D. R. (2003). The legal limits of employees’ off-duty privacy rights. Organizational Dynamics, 32(4), 372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richer, S. F., Blanchard, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (2002). A motivational model of work turnover. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2089–2113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (2000). You got mail but your employer does too: Electronic communication and privacy in the 21st century workplace. Journal of Technology and Law and Policy, 5, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J., Carayon, P., Sanders, K. J., Lim, S. Y., & LeGrande, D. (1992). Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic monitoring: Abstract. Applied Ergonomics, 23(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D., & Faley, R. A. (2001). E-mail workplace privacy issues in an information and knowledge based environment. Southern Business Review, 27(1), 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth v. Pillsbury Co. (1996). 914 F. Supp. 97 (E.D.Pa.).

  • Stanton, J. M. (2003). Effects of workplace monitoring policies on potential employment discrimination and organizational attractiveness for African Americans in the technical professions. Journal of Black Psychology, 29(3), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, E. F., & Stone, D. L. (1990). Effects of loss of privacy on physical and mental health. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology, Miami, FL.

  • Stoney, A. G., & Tompkins, P. K. (1997). Electronic performance monitoring: An organizational justice and concertive control perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(3), 259–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabak, F., & Smith, W. P. (2005). Privacy and electronic monitoring in the workplace: A model of managerial cognition and relational trust development. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thygeson v. U.S. Bancorp. (2004). WL 2066746 (D. Or.).

  • Tolchinsky, P. D., McCuddy, M. K., Adams, J., Ganster, D. C., Woodman, R. W., & Fromkin, H. L. (1981). Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(3), 308–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, R. L. (2004). Computer monitoring and surveillance: Balancing privacy with security. The CPA Journal, 74(7), 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220 (Dec. 15, 1890).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwieg, D., & Webster, J. (2002). Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 605–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry A. Friedman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, B.A., Reed, L.J. Workplace Privacy: Employee Relations and Legal Implications of Monitoring Employee E-mail Use. Employ Respons Rights J 19, 75–83 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-007-9035-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-007-9035-1

Key words

Navigation