On the Historicity of Scientific Objects
- Theodore Arabatzis
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The historical variation of scientific knowledge has lent itself to the development of historical epistemology, which attempts to historicize the origin and establishment of knowledge claims. The questions I address in this paper revolve around the historicity of the objects of those claims: How and why do new scientific objects appear? What exactly comes into being in such cases? Do scientific objects evolve over time and in what ways? I put forward and defend two theses: First, the ontology of science is so rich and variegated that there are no universally valid answers to these questions. Second, we need a pluralist account of scientific objects, a pluralist metaphysics that can do justice to their rich diversity and their various modes of being and becoming. I then focus on hidden objects, which are supposed to be part of the permanent furniture of the universe, and I discuss their birth and historicity: They emerge when various phenomena coalesce as manifestations of a single hidden cause and their representations change over time. Finally, I examine the conditions under which an evolving representation may still refer to the same object and I illustrate my argument drawing upon the early history of electrons.
- Arabatzis, T. (2003). Towards a historical ontology? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 34, 431–442. CrossRef
- Arabatzis, T. (2006). Representing electrons: A biographical approach to theoretical entities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Arabatzis, T. (2008). Experimenting on (and with) hidden entities: The inextricability of representation and intervention. In U. Feest, G. Hon, H.-J. Rheinberger, J. Schickore, & F. Steinle (Eds.), Generating experimental knowledge (pp. 7–17). MPIWG preprint 340.
- Arabatzis, T. (2009a). Cathode rays. In F. Weinert, K. Hentschel, & D. Greenberger (Eds.), Compendium of quantum physics: Concepts, experiments, history and philosophy (pp. 89–92). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Arabatzis, T. (2009b). Electrons. In F. Weinert, K. Hentschel, & D. Greenberger (Eds.), Compendium of quantum physics: Concepts, experiments, history and philosophy (pp. 195–199). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Arabatzis, T. (2011). Hidden entities and experimental practice: Renewing the dialogue between history and philosophy of science. In S. Mauskopf & T. M. Schmaltz (Eds.), Integrating history and philosophy of science: Problems and prospects (pp. 125–139). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Bensaude-Vincent, B., & Newman, W. R. (2007). Introduction: The artificial and the natural: State of the problem. In B. Bensaude-Vincent & W. R. Newman (Eds.), The artificial and the natural: An evolving polarity (pp. 1–19). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
- Bloor, D. (2005). Toward a sociology of epistemic things. Perspectives on Science, 13, 285–312. CrossRef
- Buchwald, J., & Franklin, A. (2005). Introduction: Beyond disunity and historicism. In J. Buchwald & A. Franklin (Eds.), Wrong for the right reasons. Archimedes (Vol. 11, pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRef
- Canales, J. (2009). A tenth of a second: A history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Cartwright, N. (1989). Nature’s capacities and their measurement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Chang, H. (2008). The persistence of epistemic objects through scientific change. Paper presented at the international conference What (good) is historical epistemology?, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin.
- Daston, L. (Ed.). (2000). Biographies of scientific objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Daston, L. (2008). On scientific observation. Isis, 99, 97–110. CrossRef
- Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
- del Toro Iniesta, J. C. (1996). On the discovery of the Zeeman effect on the sun and in the laboratory. Vistas in Astronomy, 40, 241–256. CrossRef
- Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Galison, P. (2004). Specific theory. Critical Inquiry, 30, 379–383. CrossRef
- Giere, R. (2006). Scientific perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hacking, I. (1992). The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 29–64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Kaiser, D. (2006). Whose mass is it anyway? Particle cosmology and the objects of theory. Social Studies of Science, 36, 533–564. CrossRef
- Klein, U., & Lefèvre, W. (2007). Materials in eighteenth-century science: A historical ontology. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
- Langevin, P. (1904). The relations of physics of electrons to other branches of science. In H. J. Rogers (Ed.), International congress of arts and science: Physics and chemistry (Vol. 7, pp. 121–156). London & New York: University Alliance.
- Latour, B. (1996). Do scientific objects have a history? Pasteur and Whitehead in a bath of lactic acid. Common Knowledge, 5, 76–91.
- Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Latour, B. (2008). A textbook case revisited—knowledge as a mode of existence. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 83–112). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
- Maxwell, G. (1962). The ontological status of theoretical entities. In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Scientific explanation, space and time. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 3, pp. 3–27). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Messeri, L. R. (2010). The problem with Pluto: Conflicting cosmologies and the classification of planets. Social Studies of Science, 40, 187–214. CrossRef
- Putnam, H. (1962). What theories are not. (Rep. in idem, Mathematics, matter and method. Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 215–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
- Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Rheinberger, H.-J. (2005). A reply to David Bloor: “Toward a sociology of epistemic things”. Perspectives on Science, 13, 406–410. CrossRef
- Rheinberger, H.-J. (2010). An epistemology of the concrete: Twentieth-century histories of life. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
- Staley, R. (2008). Einstein’s generation: The origins of the relativity revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Steinle, F. (2002). Experiments in history and philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science, 10, 408–432. CrossRef
- Thomson, J. J. (1897). Cathode rays. Philosophical magazine, 5th series, 44, 293–316.
- Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. New York: Oxford University Press.
- On the Historicity of Scientific Objects
Volume 75, Issue 3 , pp 377-390
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy and History of Science, University of Athens, University Campus, 157 71, Athens, Greece