Skip to main content
Log in

Environment models and decisions

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Aguilera PA, Fernández A, Fernández R, Rumí R, Salmerón A (2011) Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Environ Model Softw 26(12):1376–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1979) Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper Res 27:810–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang I, Keisler J, Linkov I (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci Total Environ 409(19):3578–3594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AR (2012) Avoiding environmental catastrophes: varieties of principled precaution. Ecol Soc 17:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiker G, Bridges T, Varghese AS, Seager TP, Linkov I (2005) Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental management. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Moberg E (2012) Multi-criteria decision analysis: environmental applications and case studies. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Anklam E, Collier Z, DiMase D, Renn O (2014) Risk-based standards: integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches. Environ Syst Decis 34:134–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa Howard (1968) Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo L (2007) Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modeling. Ecol Model 203:312–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Belt M (2004) Mediated modeling: a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Drs. Greg Kiker and Thomas Seager and Mr. Arun Varghese were early supporters of our efforts to incorporate MCDA into environmental assessment and management. Ivy Huang was instrumental in our second literature review and was kind enough to re-generate temporal trend presented in Fig. 2. Our current effort and this paper would not be possible without Matthew Bates, Zach Collier, and Cate Fox-Lent. Finally, we wish to thank Dr. Todd Bridges whose vision and enthusiasm increased MCDA methods in USA the Army Corps research enterprise from a single review paper in 2003 to today a multimillion dollar enterprise covering all USACE business lines, including navigation, flood management, climate change, assets management. Permission was granted by the USACE Chief of Engineers to publish this material. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the individual authors and not those of the US Army, or other sponsor organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Linkov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keisler, J., Linkov, I. Environment models and decisions. Environ Syst Decis 34, 369–372 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9515-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9515-4

Keywords

Navigation