Skip to main content
Log in

The impacts of the waterfront development in Iskandar Malaysia

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing number of waterfront projects shows that the concept of waterfront development has contributed to the advancement of the Malaysian construction industry. This study seeks to assess the impacts of the implementation of waterfront development in Iskandar Malaysia eliciting the perceived relative importance of these impacts. A comprehensive literature review has been conducted to collate the potential impacts of the waterfront development. A total of 363 sets of questionnaires were distributed to the contractors and developers registered under G7 category of the Construction Industry Development Board in Malaysia. Results show that the most significant influence of the waterfront development is related to economic benefits, while environmental impacts are not considered as a priority for this category of stakeholders. In addition, this study also indicates that the implementation of the waterfront projects has generated numerous job opportunities within the developed region. Moreover, exchanging knowledge in the planning and managing of the waterfront development is imperative to the development of the waterfront projects. Nevertheless, the shortcomings of these developments, such as the negative environmental impact on natural beaches and the coastline (i.e. pollution) as well as human-related issues (i.e. excessive human settlement), should not be taken lightly. This research confirms that the reclamation of land for waterfront development is closely correlated with the destruction of these natural structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adel, M. M., & Hossain, M. T. (2005). Impact from a superstore construction in Bartholomew’s basin. Management of Environmental Quality, 16(3), 198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S. M., & Nawawi, A. H. (2009). The social impact of urban waterfront landscapes: Malaysian perspective. In Proceeding for real crop 2009: Cities 3.0 smart, sustainable, integrative strategies, concepts and technologies for planning the urban future (pp. 529–533).

  • Breen, A., & Rigby, D. (1996). The new waterfront: A worldwide urban success story. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butuner, B. (2006). Waterfront revitalization as a challenging urban issue in Istanbul. Paper presented at 42nd ISoCaRP Congress 2006, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 1–11.

  • Chan, E., & Lee, K. L. G. (2008). Critical factor for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. C., & Huang, S. (2005). Recreating place, replacing memory: Creative destruction at the Singapore River. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 46(3), 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. O., Suen, H. C. H., & Cheung, K. K. W. (1999). PPMs: Web-based construction projects performance monitoring system. Automation in Construction, 13, 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daamen, T. A., & Vries, I. (2013). Governing the European port–city interface: Institutional impacts on spatial projects between city and port. Journal of Transport Geography, 27(2), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., & Poon, S. W. (2012). Expo 2010 Shanghai China: A signature chapter of the Huangpu Riverfronts Trilogy. Journal of Place Management and Development, 5(2), 174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enshassi, A., Mohamed, S., & Abushaban, S. (2009). Factors affecting performance of construction projects in the gaza strip. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15(3), 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, S., & Visser, G. (2007). Creating an African Riviera: Revisiting the impact of the victoria and Alfred waterfront development in Cape Town. Urban Forum, 18, 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GeoRepository. (2014). Datum: Geodetic datum of Malaysia 2000. Accessed Oct 9, 2014. Retrieved from http://georepository.com/datum_6742/Geodetic-Datum-of-Malaysia-2000.html.

  • Giovinazzi, O., & Giovinazzi, S. (2008). Waterfront planning: A window of opportunities for post-disaster reconstruction. Paper presented at 4th international I-Rec conference building, Christchurch 30th April—2nd May 2008, pp. 1–16.

  • Google Map. (2015). Johor. https://www.google.com/search?q=JOHOR&rlz=1C1CHSF_enMY655MY655&espv=2&biw=1366&bih=643&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAgQ_AUoA2oVChMI9dKK-P_IyAIVTBiOCh2szQcl#imgrc=stwhQj6o-35XSM%3A. Accessed September 10, 2015.

  • Hee, L., & Low, B. L. (2009). Water marginThe redevelopemnt of waterfronts and waterways in Asian Cities. Paper 4th international conference of the international forum on Urbanism, Amsterdam 2009, pp. 809–817.

  • Iskandar Malaysia. (2012). The making of Danga Bay to a world-class waterfront destination. The Star Publication, 12th February, Malaysia.

  • Iyer, K. C., & Jha, K. N. (2005). Factors affecting cost performance: Evidence from Indian construction project. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauhiainen, J. S. (1995). Waterfront redevelopment and urban policy: The cases of Barcelona, Cardiff and Genoa. European Planning Studies, 3(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, P. (Ed.). (1996). City, water, capital. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, R. (Ed.). (2001). Waterfronts in post-industrial cities. London: Spun Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusajaya. (2009). Nusajaya Malaysia progress. Malaysia: UEM Land.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, M. M., Bachok, S., & Rabe, N. S. (2015). Local residents’ perception on socio-economic impact of Iskandar Malaysia: An example of urban regeneration program in Malaysia. Procedia—Social and Behavioural Sciences, 170, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, N. S., Osman, M. M., & Bachok, S. (2014). Economics of local people: Iskandar Malaysia. Procedia—Social and Behavioural Sciences, 153, 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razali, M. N., Yassin, A. M., Mastor, S. H., & Zainudin, A. Z. (2014). Sustainability in waterfront development in Malaysia: Barrier to achieving best practices of waterfront development. Energy and Sustainability, 186, 421–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rexhausen, J., & Vredeveld, G. (2003). Riverfront investment: Economic impact on the Cincinnati Metropolitan Area. Economic Development Journal, 8–15.

  • Rizzo, A., & Glasson, J. (2012). Iskandar Malaysia. Cities, 29(6), 417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryckbost, P. (2005). Redeveloping urban waterfront property. USA: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sairinen, R., & Kumpulainen, S. (2006). Assessing social impacts in urban waterfront regeneration. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 120–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tungka, A. E., Omran, A., Gebril, O. A., Woo, S. W., & Suprati, B. A. (2012). Mandano waterfront development concept as sustainable city of tourism. Acta Technica Corviniensis Bulletin of Engineering, 2(4), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yassin, A., Eves, C., & McDonagh, J. (2011). The effectiveness of the riverfront development guideline in Malaysia. Paper presented at 17th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society conference, Gold Coast 16–19th January 2011, pp. 1–19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suk-Wah Woo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woo, SW., Omran, A., Lee, CL. et al. The impacts of the waterfront development in Iskandar Malaysia. Environ Dev Sustain 19, 1293–1306 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9798-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9798-3

Keywords

Navigation