Abstract
This article examines the perceptions and attitude of the semi-nomadic pastoral community “Van Gujjars” on the use and conservation of natural resources in Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. In this research article, in-depth interview and questionnaire data (n = 340) about demography and perceptions were examined from both qualitative and quantitative information. Respondents have expressed their perception about their own territories, problems, attachments, positive or negative change that occurred during their stay in and around protected area. Respondents overall positive attitudes towards conservation scenarios despite high losses from wildlife while living around protected area suggest that they may support conservation if their livelihood needs are met. Most of the respondents support the concept of conservation, and some respondents have negative attitude towards management authorities, mainly because of restricted access to the forest resources. The study illustrates and suggests a number of options for the viability of resettlement of pastoralist community. A majority of respondents indicated that there is a need for public participation in planning and implementation of resettlement process. Resettlement of Van Gujjar community may be better if exercised with the consensus of all the stakeholders. Resettlement will provide better livelihood opportunity to the pastoral community and enhance the economic status of these people as the educational level increases in time, while also improving habitat recovery leading to better biodiversity conservation. Thus, resettlements could benefit both the pastoral people and the natural resources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, A., & Redford, K. (2009). Conservation and displacement: An overview. Conservation and Society, 7, 1–10.
Allendorf, T. D. (1999). Local residents’ perception of protected areas in Nepal: Beyond conflicts and economics. Ph.D. thesis. St. Paul: The University of Minnesota, 98.
Atkinson, J. (1979). A handbook for interviews. London: HMSO.
Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (Ed.). (1997). Beyond fences: Seeking social sustainability in conservation (pp. 11–17). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
Brockington, D., & Igoe, J. (2006). Eviction for conservation. A Global Overview Conservation and Society, 4, 424–470.
Carruthers, J. (1995). The Kruger National Park: A social and political history. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.
Carter, N. H., Shrestha, B. K., Karki, J. B., Pradhan, N. M. B., & Liu, J. (2012). Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109, 15360–15365.
Champion, H. G., & Seth, S. K. (1968). A revised survey of the forest types of India. New Delhi: Manager of Publication; Government of India.
Chape, S., Blyth, S., Fish, L., Fox, P., & Spalding, M. (2003). United Nations list of protected areas. Gland and Cambridge: IUCN and UNEPWCMC.
Dasgupta, J. (2003). Transhumance pastoralists to sedentary farmers: A case study of the transformation of the Van Gujjar community of Rajaji National Park and Lansdowne Forest Division in Uttaranchal, India in CSD (Ibid).
Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1992). This fissured land. An ecological history of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
GOI (Government of India). (2007). On-line metadata file posted for 2001 census of India: Definition of household. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, Census of India. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Metadata/Metada.htm#2d
Gooch, P. (2009). Victims of conservation or rights as forest dwellers: Van Gujjar pastoralists between contesting codes of law. Conservation and Society, 7(4), 239–248.
Goswami, V. R., Vasudev, D., Karnad, D., Krishna, Y. C., Krishnadas, M., Pariwakam, M., et al. (2013). Conflict of human–wildlife coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, E108.
Harihar, A. (2011). Understanding the response of wild ungulate prey to livestock-mediated competition in western Terai Arc Landscape, India: Implications for developing management strategies to restore corridors. A report to Rufford Small Grant (for Nature Conservation).
Harihar, A., Chanchani, P., Sharma, R. K., Vattakaven, J., Gubbi, S., Pandav, B., & Noon, B. (2013). Conflating ‘‘co-occurrence’’ with ‘‘coexistence’’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, E109.
Harihar, A., Harihar, M. G., & MacMillan, D. C. (2014). Human resettlement and tiger conservation—Socio-economic assessment of pastoralists reveals a rare conservation opportunity in a human-dominated landscape. Biological Conservation, 169(2014), 167–175.
Harihar, A., Kurien, A. J., Pandav, B., & Goyal, S. P. (2007). Response of tiger population to habitat, wild ungulate prey and human disturbance in Rajaji National Park, Uttarakhand, India. Final Technical Report, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. pp. iii + 165.
Harihar, A., & Pandav, B. (2012). Influence of connectivity, wild prey and disturbance on occupancy of tigers in the human-dominated western Terai Arc Landscape. PLoS One, 7, e40105.
Hussain, A., Bargali, H. S., Dasgupta, S., & Gore, K. (2012). Demography, perception and impact of traditional pastoralists (Van Gujjars) on biotic resources of Corbett Tiger Reserve and the adjoining forest divisions. H.N.B. Garhwal University (A Central University) Srinagar, Garhwal and The Corbett Foundation, Ramnagar, Uttarakhand. Report submitted to Uttarakhand State forest department.
Hussain, A., Dasgupta, S., & Bargali, H. S. (2014). Case of house sparrow (Passer domesticus) population decline: Role of semi-nomadic pastoralist community (Van Gujjars) in their conservation. International Journal of Conservation Science, 5(4), 493–502. http://www.moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/tiger-ppt.pdf
Jhala, Y. V., Gopal, R., & Qureshi, Q. (2008). Status of tigers, co-predators and prey in India. Dehra Dun: National Tiger Conservation Authority, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India and the Wildlife Institute of India.
Joshi, R., & Singh, R. (2009). Gujjar community rehabilitation from Rajaji National Park: Moving towards an integrated approach for Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) conservation. Journal of Human Ecology, 28(3), 199–206.
Kabra, A. (2003). Displacement and rehabilitation of an Adivasi settlement: Case of Kuno Wildlife Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(29), 3073–3087.
Karanth, K. K. (2003). Forest use and human–wildlife conflicts in Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, India. Tropical Resources Bulletin, 22, 44–54.
Karanth, K. U., Gopalaswamy, A. M., Karanth, K. K., Goodrich, J., Seidensticker, J., & Robinson, J. G. (2013). Sinks as saviors: Why flawed inference cannot assist tiger recovery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, E110.
Karanth, K. U., & Karanth, K. K. (2007). Free to move: Conservation and resettlement in the Western Ghats of Karnataka, India. In K. H. Redford & E. Fearn (Eds.), Protected areas and human displacement: A conservation perspective (Working Paper 29) (pp. 48–59). New York: Wildlife Conservation Society.
Kaushal, A. (2003). Born in Jungle but being forced into cities—The inhuman face of human development in CSD, op cit.
Kothari, A., Suri, S., & Singh, N. (1995). People and protected areas: Rethinking conservation in India. Ecologist, 25, 188–194.
Kumar, D. (1995). Management plan of the Rajaji National Park (UP) Dehradun, 1995–1996 to 2005–2006.
Kutty, R., & Kothari, A. (2001). Protected areas in India: A Profile. New Delhi: Kalpavriksh Publications.
Lasgorceix, A. & Kothari, A. (2009). Displacement and relocation of protected areas: A synthesis and analysis of case studies. Economic and political weekly, December 5, 2009 Vol. XLIV No. 49.
Lindberg, G. (1929). Social research. New York: Dryden.
Lloyd, P., Mayes, A., Manstead, A. S. R., Meudell, P. R., & Wagner, H. L. (1984). Introduction to psychology: An integrated approach. London: Fontana.
Macura, B., Zorondo-Rodriguez, F., Grau-Satorras, M., Demps, K., Laval, M., Garcia, C. A., & Reyes-Garcia, V. (2011). Local community attitudes towards forests outside protected areas in India. Impact of legal awareness, trust and participation. Ecology and Society, 16(3), 10.
Madhusudan, M. D. (2004). Recovery of wild herbivores following livestock decline in a tropical Indian wildlife reserve. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 858–869.
Mehta, J., & Heinen, J. (2001). Does community-based conservation shape favourable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental Management, 28, 165–177.
Mikkelsen, B. (1995). Methods for development work and research. A guide for practitioners. London, UK: SAGE publications. 296.
MOEF (Ministry of Environment and Forests). (2005). Joining the Dots: Report of the Tiger Task Force. New Delhi: MOEF, Government of India.
Mishra, C. (2000). Socioeconomic transition and wildlife conservation in the Indian Trans-Himalaya. Journal Bombay Natural History Society, 97(1), 25–32.
Mishra, B. K., Badola, R., & Bhardwaj, A. K. (2007). Conservation induced displacement and resettlement: A case study of Gujjar rehabilitation from Rajaji National Park. Indian Forests, 133, 1341–1349.
Muller, D., & Zeller, M. (2002). Land use dynamics in the central highlands of Vietnam: A spatial model combining village survey data with satellite imagery interpretation. Agricultural Economics, 27, 333–354.
Neumann, R. P. (1998). Imposing wilderness, struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Peh, K. S. H., de Jong, J., Sodhi, N. S., Lim, S. L. H., & Yap, C. A. M. (2005). Lowland rain forest avifauna and human disturbance: Persistence of primary forest birds in selectively logged forests and mixed-rural habitats of southern peninsular Malaysia. Biology Conservation, 123, 489–505.
Reid, H., Fig, D., Magome, H., & Williams, N. (2004). Co-management of contractual national parks in South Africa: Lessons from Australia. Conservation and Society, 2(2), 377–409.
Rodgers, A., Hartley, D., & Bashir, S. (2003). Community approaches to conservation: Some comparisons from Africa and India. In V. Saberwal & M. Rangarajan (Eds.), Battles over nature: Science and politics of conservation (pp. 324–382). New Delhi: Permanent Black.
Rodrigues, A. S. L., et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in maintaining species diversity. Nature, 428, 640–643.
Sharma, J., Gairola, S., Gaur, R. D., & Painuli, R. M. (2012). Forest utilization patterns and socio-economic status of the Van Gujjar tribe in sub-Himalayan tracts of Uttarakhand, India. Forestry Studies in China, 14(1), 36–46.
Technical and Policy Core Group (TPCG), Kalpavriksh. (2005). Securing India’s future: Final technical report of the national biodiversity strategy and action plan. Kalpavriksh, Delhi/Pune: NBSAP.
Karanth, K. U. (2002). Nagarahole: Limits and opportunities in wildlife conservation. In J. Terborgh, C. van Schaik, L. Davenport, & M. Rao (Eds.), Making parks work: Strategies for preserving tropical nature (pp. 189–202). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Acknowledgments
We are highly grateful to “The Corbett Foundation”, Dhikuli, Ramnagar, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India, for providing necessary facilities funds. Sincere thanks are also due to the Forest Department officials for their kind support and cooperation. We are also thankful to the Van Gujjars for their cooperation during data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hussain, A., Dasgupta, S. & Bargali, H.S. Conservation perceptions and attitudes of semi-nomadic pastoralist towards relocation and biodiversity management: a case study of Van Gujjars residing in and around Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. Environ Dev Sustain 18, 57–72 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9621-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9621-6