Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Protected areas as vehicles in population development: lessons from rural South Africa

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protected areas in developing countries are increasingly expected to move beyond biodiversity protection so as also to contribute to poverty reduction and the economic development of their surrounding communities. The purpose of this article is to report on the key findings that emerged from the assessment of a poverty alleviation programme at the Golden Gate Highlands National Park in South Africa and the lessons learned from that particular programme. Designed around outcomes analysis as an analytical framework for programme evaluation, a mixed-method approach of semi-structured interviews and focus-group sessions was used to collect data from amongst programme beneficiaries, the park management and members of the park’s advisory board. The findings indicate that although programmes of this kind can indeed impact positively on poverty levels, their direct impacts do however remain limited to a relatively small proportion of households in neighbouring communities. The article concludes that by conceptualising poverty as a multidimensional state of well-being, this allows for the exploration of a much broader range of potential social, cultural and economic benefits available from protected areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algotsson, E. (2006). Wildlife conservation through people-centred approaches to natural resource management programmes and the control of wildlife exploitation. Local Environment, 11(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andam, K. S., Ferraro, P. J., Sims, K. R. E., Healy, A., & Holland, M. B. (2010). Protected areas reduced poverty in Costa Rica and Thailand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(22), 9996–10001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balint, P. J. (2007). A proposed general model for Southern African community-based wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 12(3), 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15188–15193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brechin, S. R., Murray, G., & Benjamin, C. (2007). Contested ground in nature protection: Current challenges and opportunities in community-based natural resources and protected areas management. In J. Pretty, A. S. Ball, T. Benton, J. S. Guivant, D. R. Lee, D. Orr, M. J. Pfeffer, & H. Ward (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of environment and society (pp. 553–577). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D. (2002). Fortress conservation: The preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Indiana: Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D., Duffy, R., & Igoe, J. (2008). Nature unbound: Conservation, capitalism and the future of protected areas. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sherbinin, A. (2008). Is poverty more acute near parks? An assessment of infant mortality rates around protected areas in developing countries. Oryx, 42(1), 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Affairs. (2009). A review of the people and parks programme. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Affairs. (2011). People and parks program. http://www.peopleandparks.com/about. Accessed March 24, 2011.

  • Department of Water Affairs. (2011). Working for water. http://www.dwaf.gov.za/wfw/. Accessed April 7, 2011.

  • Dudley, N., Mansourian, S., Stolton, S., & Suksuwan, S. (2008). Protected areas and poverty reduction. Gland: World Wide Fund for Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius, C., Koch, E., & Magome, H. (2001). Community wildlife management in Southern Africa: Challenging the assumptions of Eden. Nottingham: Russell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, D., & Murphree, M. (2001). Community conservation as policy: Promise and performance. In D. Hulme & M. Murphree (Eds.), African wildlife and livelihoods (pp. 280–297). Cape Town: David Philip.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, A., Anuradha, R. V., & Pathak, N. (1998). Community-based conservation: Issues and prospects. In A. Kothari, N. Pathak, R. V. Anuradha, & B. Taneja (Eds.), Communities and conservation: Natural resource management in South and Central Asia (pp. 27–55). New Delhi: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves, L. A., Holland, M. B., & Brandon, K. (2005). The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment Resources, 30, 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelser, A. J., Redelinghuys, N., & Velelo, N. (2011). People, parks and poverty: Integrated conservation and development initiatives in the Free State Province of South Africa. In O. Grillo & G. Venora (Eds.), Biological diversity and sustainable resources use (pp. 35–62). Rijeka: InTech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelser, A. J., & Sempe, A. (2003). Omgewingsbestuur in’n nuwe era:’n nis vir die Geesteswetenskappe. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe, 43(3&4), 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Reference Bureau. (2011). World population data sheet. Washington: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, D., & Walpole, M. J. (2010). Whose value counts? Trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and poverty reduction. In N. Leader-Williams, W. M. Adams, & R. J. Smith (Eds.), Trade-offs in conservation: Deciding what to save (pp. 157–174). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M. C. (2009). An integrated approach to assess the impacts of tourism on community development and sustainable livelihoods. Community Development Journal, 44(2), 186–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South Africa Tours and Travel. (2005). Golden Gate Highlands National Park in South Africa, place of golden beauty. http://www.south-africa-tours-and-travel.com/golden-gate-highlands-national-park.html. Accessed June 18, 2012.

  • South African Institute of Race Relations. (2009). South Africa Survey 2008/2009. Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • South African Institute of Race Relations. (2010). South Africa Survey 2009/2010. Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • South African National Parks (SANParks). (2011a). Golden Gate Highlands National Park. http://www.sanparks.co.za/parks/golden_gate/all.php. Accessed March 17, 2012.

  • South African National Parks (SANParks). (2011b). People and conservation: A brief history. http://www.sanparks.org/people/about/history.php. Accessed March 12, 2012.

  • Spenceley, A. (2008). Responsible tourism in Southern Africa. In A. Spenceley (Ed.), Responsible tourism: Critical issues for conservation and development (pp. 1–24). Sterling: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa. (2007). Community survey. http://www.statssa.gov.za/. Accessed February 19, 2012.

  • Tucker, B. (2010). Clarens leads in dinosaur fossil find. Financial Mail, 1 July. http://www.fm.co.za/Article.aspx?id=113520. Accessed January 26, 2011.

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2004). Exploring the links: Human well-being and ecosystem services. Nairobi: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, C., Ladle, R., Hulme, D., Jiang, T., Brockington, D., & Adams, W. M. (2008). Are poverty and protected area establishment linked at a national scale? Oryx, 42(1), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, M. P., & McShane, T. O. (2004). Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. Ambio, 33(8), 513–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Working for Wetlands. (2010). Working for WetlandsGolden Gate. http://www.southafricanbiodiversity.co.za/wetlands/164-working-for-wetlands-golden-gate-highlands-national-park. Accessed March 6, 2011.

  • World Health Organisation. (1997). Nutrition and poverty. Geneva: ACC/SCN Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Parks Congress. (2003). The Durban Accord. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/durbanaccorden.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2011.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research project was approved by South African National Parks and it complies with the ethical standards set by the latter. The authors wish to thank South African National Parks, and particularly the management of the Golden Gate Highlands National Park, for their support during the field study for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Pelser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pelser, A., Redelinghuys, N. & Velelo, N. Protected areas as vehicles in population development: lessons from rural South Africa. Environ Dev Sustain 15, 1205–1226 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9434-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9434-4

Keywords

Navigation