Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical modeling of turbulent dispersion for wind-driven rain on building facades

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wind-driven rain (WDR) is one of the most important moisture sources with potential negative effects on the hygrothermal performance and durability of building facades. The impact of WDR on building facades can be understood in a better way by predicting the surface wetting distribution accurately. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations can be used to obtain accurate spatial and temporal information on WDR. In many previous numerical WDR studies, the turbulent dispersion of the raindrops has been neglected. However, it is not clear to what extent this assumption is justified, and to what extent the deviations between the experimental and the numerical results in previous studies can be attributed to the absence of turbulent dispersion in the model. In this paper, an implementation of turbulent dispersion into an Eulerian multiphase model for WDR assessment is proposed. First, CFD WDR simulations are performed for a simplified isolated high-rise building, with and without turbulent dispersion. It is shown that the turbulence intensity field in the vicinity of the building, and correspondingly the turbulence kinetic energy field, has a strong influence on the estimated catch ratio values when turbulent dispersion is taken into account. Next, CFD WDR simulations are made for a monumental tower building, for which experimental data are available. It is shown that taking turbulent dispersion into account reduces the average deviation between simulations and measurements from 24 to 15 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2004) A review of wind-driven rain research in building science. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 92:1079–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2010) Overview of three state-of-the-art wind-driven rain assessment models and comparison based on model theory. Build Environ 45:691–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Erkal A, D’Ayala D, Sequeira L (2012) Assessment of wind-driven rain impact, related surface erosion and surface strength reduction of historic building materials. Build Environ 57:336–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jorgensen GJ, Terwilliger KM, DelCueto JA, Glick SH, Kempe MD, Pankow JW et al (2006) Moisture transport, adhesion, and corrosion protection of PV module packaging materials. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 90:2739–2775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kempe MD (2006) Modeling of rates of moisture ingress into photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 90:2720–2738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer EL, van Dyk EE (2004) Assessing the reliability and degradation of photovoltaic module performance parameters. IEEE Trans on Reliab 53:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanders CH, Phillipson MC (2003) UK adaptation strategy and technical measures: the impacts of climate change on buildings. Build Res Inf 31:210–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2002) Spatial and temporal distribution of driving rain on a low-rise building. Wind Struct 5:441–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blocken B, Derome D, Carmeliet J (2013) Rainwater runoff from building facades: a review. Build Environ 60:339–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2005) High-resolution wind-driven rain measurements on a low-rise building—experimental data for model development and model validation. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 93:905–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2006) On the accuracy of wind-driven rain measurements on buildings. Build Environ 41:1798–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Högberg A, Kragh M, van Mook FJR (1999) A comparison of driving rain measurements with different gauges. In: Proceedings of 5th symposium of building physics in the Nordic countries. Göteborg, Sweden, pp. 361–368

  13. ISO 15927-3 (2009) Hygrothermal performance of buildings—calculation and presentation of climatic data—part 3: calculation of a driving rain index for vertical surfaces from hourly wind and rain data. International Organization for Standardization

  14. Sanders C (1996) Heat, air and moisture transfer in insulated envelope parts. IEA annex 24, final report, vol 2. Task 2: environmental conditions, Leuven, Belgium

  15. Blocken B, Dezso G, van Beeck J, Carmeliet J (2009) The mutual influence of two buildings on their wind-driven rain exposure and comments on the obstruction factor. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 97:180–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Carmeliet J, Hensen JLM (2011) Application of computational fluid dynamics in building performance simulation for the outdoor environment: an overview. J Build Perform Simul 4:157–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moonen P, Defraeye TWJ, Dorer V, Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2012) Urban physics: effect of the microclimate on comfort, health and energy demand. Front Archit Res 1(3):197–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blocken B, Abuku M, Nore K, Briggen PM, Schellen HL, Thue JV et al (2011) Intercomparison of wind-driven rain deposition models based on two case studies with full-scale measurements. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99:448–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi ECC (1991) Numerical simulation of wind-driven rain falling onto a 2-D building. In: Asia Pacific conference on computational mechanics, Hong Kong, pp. 1721–1728

  20. Choi ECC (1993) Simulation of wind-driven-rain around a building. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 4647:721–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi ECC (1994) Determination of wind-driven-rain intensity on building faces. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 51:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi ECC (2002) Modelling of wind-driven rain and its soil detachment effect on hill slopes. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 90:1081–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi ECC (1997) Numerical modelling of gust effect on wind-driven rain. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 72:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2006) The influence of the wind-blocking effect by a building on its wind-driven rain exposure. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 94:101–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2007) Validation of CFD simulations of wind-driven rain on a low-rise building facade. Build Environ 42:2530–2548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Briggen PM, Blocken B, Schellen HL (2009) Wind-driven rain on the facade of a monumental tower: numerical simulation, full-scale validation and sensitivity analysis. Build Environ 44:1675–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van Mook FJR (2002) Driving rain on building envelopes. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology

  28. Huang SH, Li QS (2010) Numerical simulations of wind-driven rain on building envelopes based on Eulerian multiphase model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 98:843–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kubilay A, Derome D, Blocken B, Carmeliet J (2013) CFD simulation and validation of wind-driven rain on a building facade with an Eulerian multiphase model. Build Environ 61:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lakehal D, Mestayer PG, Edson JB, Anquetin S, Sini JF (1995) Eulero–Lagrangian simulation of raindrop trajectories and impacts within the urban canopy. Atmos Environ 29:3501–3517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hangan H (1999) Wind-driven rain studies. A C-FD-E approach. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 81:323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Etyemezian V, Davidson CI, Zufall M, Dai W, Finger S, Striegel M (2000) Impingement of rain drops on a tall building. Atmos Environ 34:2399–2412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang S, Li Q (2012) Large eddy simulations of wind-driven rain on tall building facades. J Struct Eng 138:967–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shih T-H, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J (1995) A new k-\(\epsilon \) eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput Fluids 24:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hill DP (1998) The computer simulation of dispersed two-phase flow. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine

  36. Rusche H (2002) Computational fluid dynamics of dispersed two-phase flows at high phase fractions. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine

  37. de Wolf DA (2001) On the Laws–Parsons distribution of raindrop sizes. Radio Sci 36:639–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gosman AD, Lekakou C, Politis S, Issa RI, Looney MK (1992) Multidimensional modeling of turbulent two-phase flows in stirred vessels. AIChE J 38:1946–1956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gousseau P, Blocken B, van Heijst GJF (2011) CFD simulation of pollutant dispersion around isolated buildings: on the role of convective and turbulent mass fluxes in the prediction accuracy. J Hazard Mater 194:422–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Loth E (2000) Numerical approaches for motion of dispersed particles, droplets and bubbles. Prog Energy Combust Sci 26:161–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Boussinesq J (1887) Essai sur la théorie des eaux courantes. Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l’Académie des Sciences., vol 23. Academy of Sciences, Paris, pp 1–680

    Google Scholar 

  42. Issa RI, Oliveira PJ (1993) Modelling of turbulent dispersion in two phase flow jets. Eng Turbul Model Exp 2:947–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shirolkar JS, Coimbra CFM, McQuay MQ (1996) Fundamental aspects of modeling turbulent particle dispersion in dilute flows. Prog Energy Combust Sci 22:363–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Politis S (1989) Prediction of two-phase solid-liquid turbulent flow in stirred vessels. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine

  45. Chen CP, Wood PE (1985) A turbulence closure model for dilute gas-particle flows. Can J Chem Eng 63:349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Issa RI (1992) A simple model for Ct. Private Communication, December 1992

  47. Melville WK, Bray KNC (1979) A model of the two-phase turbulent jet. Int J Heat Mass Transf 22:647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Best AC (1950) The size distribution of raindrops. Q J R Met Soc 76:16–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M et al (2008) AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:1749–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlunzen KH, Carissimo B (2011) The COST 732 best practice guideline for CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment: a summary. Int J Environ Pollut 44:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wieringa J (1992) Updating the Davenport roughness classification. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 41:357–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3:269–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Cebeci T, Bradshaw P (1977) Momentum transfer in boundary layers. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  54. Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Carmeliet J (2007) CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos Environ 41:238–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. OpenCFD Ltd. (2011) OpenFOAM v2.0.1 documentation

  56. Gunn R, Kinzer GD (1949) The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets in stagnant air. J Meteorol 6:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  58. Defraeye TWJ (2011) Convective heat and mass transfer at exterior building surfaces. Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

  59. Hargreaves DM, Wright NG (2007) On the use of the k-epsilon model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95:355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. O’Sullivan JP, Archer RA, Flay RGJ (2011) Consistent boundary conditions for flows within the atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Parente A, Gorle C, van Beeck J, Benocci C (2011) Improved kappa-epsilon model and wall function formulation for the RANS simulation of ABL flows. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Richards PJ, Hoxey RP (1993) Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-\(\epsilon \) turbulence model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 4647:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Blocken B, Carmeliet J, Stathopoulos T (2007) CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings—effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95:941–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Murakami S (1990) Computational wind engineering. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 36:517–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Murakami S (1993) Comparison of various turbulence models applied to a bluff-body. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 46(7):21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Murakami S, Sawaki S (2008) Comparison of various revised k-\(\epsilon \) models and LES applied to flow around a high-rise building model with 1:1:2 shape placed within the surface boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported through the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)—Project no. 135510.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chair of Building Physics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETHZ), Zurich, Switzerland

    A. Kubilay, D. Derome & J. Carmeliet

  2. Laboratory for Building Science and Technology, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA), Dübendorf, Switzerland

    A. Kubilay, D. Derome & J. Carmeliet

  3. Building Physics and Services, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    B. Blocken

Authors
  1. A. Kubilay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Derome
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Blocken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Carmeliet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kubilay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kubilay, A., Derome, D., Blocken, B. et al. Numerical modeling of turbulent dispersion for wind-driven rain on building facades. Environ Fluid Mech 15, 109–133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9363-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9363-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation