Skip to main content
Log in

Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in the presence of variable viscosity for mudflow resuspension in estuaries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The temporal stability of a parallel shear flow of miscible fluid layers of different density and viscosity is investigated through a linear stability analysis and direct numerical simulations. The geometry and rheology of this Newtonian fluid mixing can be viewed as a simplified model of the behavior of mudflow at the bottom of estuaries for suspension studies. In this study, focus is on the stability and transition to turbulence of an initially laminar configuration. A parametric analysis is performed by varying the values of three control parameters, namely the viscosity ratio, the Richardson and Reynolds numbers, in the case of initially identical thickness of the velocity, density and viscosity profiles. The range of parameters has been chosen so as to mimic a wide variety of real configurations. This study shows that the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability is controlled by the local Reynolds and Richardson numbers of the inflection point. In addition, at moderate Reynolds number, viscosity stratification has a strong influence on the onset of instability, the latter being enhanced at high viscosity ratio, while at high Reynolds number, the influence is less pronounced. In all cases, we show that the thickness of the mixing layer (and thus resuspension) is increased by high viscosity stratification, in particular during the non-linear development of the instability and especially pairing processes. This study suggests that mud viscosity has to be taken into account for resuspension parameterizations because of its impact on the inflection point Reynolds number and the viscosity ratio, which are key parameters for shear instabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams JCE, Wells JT, Park YA (1993) Nearshore and estuarine cohesive sediment transport, coastal estuarine stud., vol 42, AGU, Chap. Wave motions on a lutocline above a stably stratified bottom boundary layer, pp 393–410. doi: 10.1029/CE042p0393

  2. Amos CL, Umgiesser G, Ferrarin C, Thompson CEL, Whitehouse RJS, Sutherland TF, Bergamasco A (2010) The erosion rates of cohesive sediments in Venice lagoon, Italy. Cont Shelf Res 30(8):859–870. doi:10.1016/j.csr.2009.12.001

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antkowiak A, Brancher P (2007) On vortex rings around vortices: an optimal mechanism. J Fluid Mech 578:295–304. doi:10.1017/S0022112007005198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balmforth NJ, Roy A, Caulfield CP (2012) Dynamics of vorticity defects in stratified shear flow. J Fluid Mech 694:292–331. doi:10.1017/jfm.2011.548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonometti T, Balachandar S, Magnaudet J (2008) Wall effects in non-boussinesq density currents. J Fluid Mech 616:445–475. doi:10.1017/S002211200800414X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Calmet I, Magnaudet J (1997) Large-eddy simulation of high-schmidt number mass transfer in a turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids 9(2):438–455. doi:10.1063/1.869138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carpenter JR, Balmforth NJ, Lawrence GA (2010) Identifying unstable modes in stratified shear layers. Phys Fluids 22(5):054104. doi:10.1063/1.3379845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Caulfield CP (1994) Multiple linear instability of layered stratified shear flow. J Fluid Mech Digit Arch 258(–1):255–285. doi:10.1017/S0022112094003320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corcos GM, Lin SJ (1984) The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow. Part 2. The origin of the three-dimensional motion. J Fluid Mech 139:67–95. doi:10.1017/S0022112084000264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Corcos GM, Sherman FS (1984) The mixing layer: deterministic models of a turbulent flow. Part 1. Introduction and the two-dimensional flow. J Fluid Mech 139:29–65. doi:10.1017/S0022112084000252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cugier P, Le Hir P (2002) Development of a 3D hydrodynamic model for coastal ecosystem modelling. Application to the plume of the Seine River (France). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 55(5):673–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Drazin PG, Reid WH (1984) Hydrodynamic stability. Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi:10.2277/0521525411

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ern P, Charru F, Luchini P (2003) Stability analysis of a shear flow with strongly stratified viscosity. J Fluid Mech 496:295–312. doi:10.1017/S0022112003006372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fabre D, Sipp D, Jacquin L (2006) Kelvin waves and the singular modes of the Lamb–Oseen vortex. J Fluid Mech 551:235–274. doi:10.1017/S0022112005008463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fontane J, Joly L (2008) The stability of the variable-density Kelvin–Helmholtz billow. J Fluid Mech 612:237–260. doi:10.1017/S0022112008002966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geyer WR, Lavery AC, Scully ME, Trowbridge JH (2010) Mixing by shear instability at high reynolds number. Geophys Res Lett 37. doi:10.1029/2010GL045272

  17. Govindarajan R (2004) Effect of miscibility on the linear instability of two-fluid channel flow. Int J Multiph Flow 30(10):1177–1192. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2004.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hallez Y, Magnaudet J (2009) A numerical investigation of horizontal viscous gravity currents. J Fluid Mech 630:71–91. doi:10.1017/S0022112009006454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hardisty J (2007) Estuaries: monitoring and modeling the physical system. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. doi:10.1002/9780470750889.fmatter

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hazel P (1972) Numerical studies of the stability of inviscid stratified shear flows. J Fluid Mech 51:39–61. doi:10.1017/S0022112072001065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Healey JJ (2009) Destabilizing effects of confinement on homogeneous mixing layers. J Fluid Mech 623:241–271. doi:10.1017/S0022112008005284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Helmholtz H (1868) über discontinuirliche flüssigkeitsbewegungen. Monats Könibl Preuss Akad Wiss Berl 23:215–228

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hinch EJ (1984) A note on the mechanism of the instability at the interface between two shearing fluids. J Fluid Mech 144:463–465. doi:10.1017/S0022112084001695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holmboe J (1962) On the behaviour of symmetric waves in stratified shear layers. Geoflfs Publ 24:67–113

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hooper AP, Boyd WGC (1983) Shear-flow instability at the interface between two viscous fluids. J Fluid Mech 128:507–528. doi:10.1017/S0022112083000580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang GS, Shu CW (1996) Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J Comput Phys 126:202–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kelvin L (1871) Hydrokinetic solutions and observations. Philos Mag 42(4):362–377

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kranenburg C, Winterwerp JC (1997) Erosion of fluid mud layers. I: entrainment model. J Hydraul Eng 123(6):504–511. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429

    Google Scholar 

  29. Le Hir P, Cayocca F, Waeles B (2011) Dynamics of sand and mud mixtures: a multiprocess-based modelling strategy. Cont Shelf Res 10:S135–S149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Le Normant C (2000) Three-dimensional modelling of cohesive sediment transport in the Loire estuary. Hydrol Process 14(13):2231–2243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Legendre D, Magnaudet J (1998) The lift force on a spherical bubble in a viscous linear shear flow. J Fluid Mech 368:81–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Malik SV, Hooper AP (2005) Linear stability and energy growth of viscosity stratified flows. Phys Fluids 17(2):024101. doi:10.1063/1.1834931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mashayek A, Peltier WR (2011) Three-dimensionalization of the stratified mixing layer at high Reynolds number. Phys Fluids 23(11):111701. doi:10.1063/1.3651269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McAnally WH, Friedrichs C, Hamilton D, Hayter E, Shrestha P, Rodriguez H, Sheremet A, Teeter A, Task Committee on Management of Fluid Mud A (2007) Management of fluid mud in estuaries, bays, and lakes. I: present state of understanding on character and behavior. J Hydraul Eng 133(1):9–22. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429

    Google Scholar 

  35. McAnally WH, Teeter A, Schoellhamer D, Friedrichs C, Hamilton D, Hayter E, Shrestha P, Rodriguez H, Sheremet A, Kirby R, Task Committee on Management of Fluid Mud A (2007) Management of fluid mud in estuaries, bays, and lakes. II: measurement, modeling, and management. J Hydraul Eng 133(1):23–38. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mehta AJ, Srinivas R (1993) Observations on the entrainment of fluid mud by shear flow. Coast Estuar Stud 42:224–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mehta A, Ej H, Parker WR, Krone RB, Teeter AM (1989) Cohesive sediment transport. I: process description. J Hydraul Eng 115:1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Miles JW (1961) On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows. J Fluid Mech 10(04):496–508. doi:10.1017/S0022112061000305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Neumeier U, Ferrarin C, Amos CL, Umgiesser G, Li MZ (2008) Sedtrans05: an improved sediment-transport model for continental shelves and coastal waters with a new algorithm for cohesive sediments. Comput Geosci 34(10):1223–1242. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.007

    Google Scholar 

  40. Odd NV, Cooper AJ (1989) A two-dimensional model of the movement of fluid mud in a high energy turbid estuary. J Coast Res 5:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  41. Orr WW (1907) The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. Proc R Ir Acad Sect A 27:9–68, 69–138

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ozdemir CE, Hsu TJ, Balachandar S (2011) A numerical investigation of lutocline dynamics and saturation of fine sediment in the oscillatory boundary layer. J Geophys Res 116(C9). doi:10.1029/2011JC007185

  43. Ozgen S, Degrez G, Sarma GSR (1998) Two-fluid boundary layer stability. Phys Fluids 10(11):2746–2757. doi:10.1063/1.869798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Partheniades E (1965) Erosion and deposition of cohesive soils. J Hydraul Div ASCE 91(1):105–137

    Google Scholar 

  45. Patnaik PC, Sherman FS, Corcos GM (1976) A numerical simulation of Kelvin–Helmholtz waves of finite amplitude. J Fluid Mech Digit Arch 73(02):215–240. doi:10.1017/S0022112076001353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Peltier WR, Caulfield CP (2003) Mixing efficiency in stratified shear flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35(1):135–167. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rayleigh L (1879) On the stability, or instability, of certain fluid motions. Proc Lond Math Soc 11(1):57–72. doi:10.1112/plms/s1-11.1.57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sahu KC, Ding H, Valluri P, Matar OK (2009) Linear stability analysis and numerical simulation of miscible two-layer channel flow. Phys Fluids 21(4):042104. doi:10.1063/1.3116285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sommerfeld A (1908) Ein beitrag zur hydrodynamischen erklaerung der turbulenten fluessigkeitsbewegungen, vol 3. In: Proceedings 4th International Congress of Mathematicians, Rome, pp 116–124

  50. Squire HB (1933) On the stability for three-dimensional disturbances of viscous fluid flow between parallel walls. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 142(847):621–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Srinivas R, Mehta A (1989) Observations on estuarine fluid mud entrainment. Int J Sediment Res 5(1):15–22

    Google Scholar 

  52. Staquet C (1995) Two-dimensional secondary instabilities in a strongly stratified shear layer. J Fluid Mech 296:73–126. doi:10.1017/S0022112095002072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Staquet C (2000) Mixing in a stably stratified shear layer: two- and three-dimensional numerical experiments. Fluid Dyn Res 27(6):367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Taylor G (1931) Effect of variation in density on the stability of superposed streams of fluid. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 132(820):499–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wolanski E, Asaeda T, Imberger J (1989) Mixing across a lutocline. Limnol Oceanogr 34(5):931–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yih CS (1955) Stability of two-dimensional parallel flows for three-dimensional disturbances. Quart Appl Math 4:434–435

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yih CS (1967) Instability due to viscosity stratification. J Fluid Mech 27(02):337–352. doi:10.1017/S0022112067000357

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author is supported by a scholarship intended for Ph.D. students funded by the DGA (Direction Générale de l’Armement). This work has benefited computational means from the Scientific Groupement CALMIP (Projet P1016), CINES (imf6359) and IDRIS (Projet 99651), the contribution of which are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Thual.

Appendix

Appendix

In this appendix, we describe the method that we have developed to identify the discretised K–H modes among spurious modes tracing back the continuous spectrum of the linear problem.

1.1 Characterization of the spurious modes

Spurious modes are characterized by a Chebyshev decomposition of the \(z\)-profiles that is not converged. The associated spurious eigenvalues stand close to the marginal curve of null growth rate \(\sigma ^*=0\). We interpret them as a continuous spectrum of internal waves trapped in critical layers. A physical hint of these modes can be caught by considering the refraction of plane internal waves by density stratification and shear. The WKB method describes the evolution of wave packets of the wave vector \({k,m(z)}\) in the two-dimensional plane \((x,z)\). They form a solution of the Eikonale equation \(\Omega [k,m(z),z]=\Omega _0\) with \(\Omega (k,m,z)=\sqrt{\frac{g}{\rho _r}\frac{\partial \overline{\rho }}{\partial z}}\frac{k}{\sqrt{m^2+k^2}}+k\, \overline{u}(z)\) and \(\Omega _0\) constant, where \(\rho _r\) is the reference density used in the framework of a Boussinesq approximation of the Navier–Stokes equations.

Figure 19 presents isovalues of the frequency for fixed wave number, representing rays of internals waves, in the \((m,z)\) plane. Divergent trajectories are observed and characterized by horizontals asymptotes (as dotted line for \(\omega =0.9\)) with \(m \rightarrow \infty \) and \(z \rightarrow z_c\). These asymptotes correspond to absorption critical layers of internal waves. Due to viscosity, equation does not degenerate as Rayleigh equation for \(\overline{u}=c\). Yet, very high resolution is needed since these layers present a thickness of \((k^*Re)^{-1/3}\) (see [12]). Non-converged but physical modes with positive growth rate have their origin in these critical layers. To validate this hypothesis, the relation of dispersion \(\omega \sim k\, \overline{u}(z_c)\) have been verified. Frequency of modes are compared to \(k\, \overline{u}(z_c)\), by obtaining \(z_c\) from vertical profiles of the mode. Figure 21 shows that the growth rate of these modes decreases when resolution grows: they are under-resolved. Figure 20 shows that these modes also decrease around \(Ri=0\). This evolution corroborate the relation between modes and internal waves.

Fig. 19
figure 19

Isovalues of \(\Omega [k,m(z),z]\) in the \((m,z)\) plane for \(Ri=0,15\), \(k^*=0,8\), zoomed on \(z \in [0.9,2.3]\)

Fig. 20
figure 20

Growth rate of the two most unstable eigenmodes as a function of the Richardson number for \(W=0\), \(k^*=1.1\)

Fig. 21
figure 21

Growth rate of the two most unstable eigenmode, for \(W=3\), \(k^*=0.95\), \(Re=100\), \(Ri=0.15\). a Variation with the resolution. b Variation with \(\alpha \)

1.2 Complex mapping function

The elimination of these spurious modes at the profit of the searched K–H modes is achieved through the use of a complex mapping in the LiSa code. This stability code is based on a spectral decomposition using Chebyshev polynomials with a collocation method using a mapping transforming the spectral variable \(s \in [-1, 1]\) (Gauss–Lobatto collocation points) into the physical variable \(z\). A first real mapping \(z=\varphi _0(s)\) reads:

$$\begin{aligned} \varphi _0(z)=C_1 \left[ 1- e^{ C_2\, \mathrm {arctanh}\left( C_3 s\right) +C_4 } \right] , \end{aligned}$$

where the constants \(C_1\), \(C_2\), \(C_3\) and \(C_4\) are adjusted to match the positions of the interface and the two boundaries as well as to adjust the refinement of the collocation grid near the interface. Based on an idea of Fabre et al. [14], we have extended it to the complex mapping \(\varphi _{\alpha }(z) = \varphi _0(s)\, (1- i\, \alpha )\) with \(\alpha =0.010369-0.035621\, \mathrm {Ri}\). As presented on Fig. 21b, \(\alpha \) can been determined through a sensitivity analysis of the eigenvalues with respect to its value. We choose the lowest value of \(\alpha \) for which growth rate of spurious eigenvalues pass horizontal neutral axes (corresponding to their supposed position).

Figure 22 presents the eigenvalues spectrum for the two mappings. With the real mapping \(\varphi _0\), the KH mode is “hidden” in a continuous spectrum of non-converged mode corresponding to internal waves trapped in absorption critical layers as presented earlier. With the complex mapping \(\varphi _\alpha \), the continuous spectrum is pushed below while the unstable KH-mode subsists and exhibit a converged Chebyshev decomposition. The use of the complex mapping is equivalent to a deformation of the integration path in the complex plane, which avoids the singularities at the \(z\) real points corresponding to the critical layers. The error done with a constant \(\alpha \) mapping, which does not bring back the integration path towards the real axes, appears to be negligible for the eigenvalue precision looked at in the present work.

Fig. 22
figure 22

Eigenvalues spectra for\(Ri=0.15\), \(W=3\), \(Re=10^2\), \(k^*=0.95\). Comparison of the real and complex mappings. Eigenvalues with red circles correspond to converged modes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harang, A., Thual, O., Brancher, P. et al. Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in the presence of variable viscosity for mudflow resuspension in estuaries. Environ Fluid Mech 14, 743–769 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9337-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9337-4

Keywords

Navigation