Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing young children’s ability to compare probabilities

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparing probabilities is a useful skill in life. Binary choice tasks are popular means in research on probabilistic reasoning. Falk, Yudilevich-Assouline, and Elstein (Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(2), 207–233 2012) noted that many of these tasks contain design flaws. We designed and evaluated an extended and improved binary choice item set. In each trial, children were shown two boxes containing desired and undesired elements and had to identify the best box to blindly draw from. We took into account four necessary item set characteristics: (un)desired elements in the correct box, total number of elements in the correct box, and difference between desired and undesired elements in the correct box. Furthermore, some extensions to Falk et al.’s design (2012) were implemented: items in which one box certainly provided a desired element, items with three competing colors of elements, and items with lower “countability” of the elements. Results showed that extensions added to the design did not imperil internal consistency and validity. Younger children were more likely to give correct answers when the correct box contained more desired elements and older children are better at comparing probabilities than younger ones overall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bryant, P. & Nunes, T. (2012). Children’s understanding of probability: A literature review (full Report). Nuffield Foundation.

  • Canizares, M. J., Batanero, C., Serrano, L., & Ortfz, J. J. (1997). Subjective elements in children’s comparison of probabilities. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 2, pp. 49–56). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki: Columbus, OH: Eric Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

  • Denison, S., & Xu, F. (2014). The origins of probabilistic inference in human infants. Cognition, 130(3), 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R., Falk, R., & Levin, I. (1980). A potential for learning probability in young children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(2), 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R., Yudilevich-Assouline, P., & Elstein, A. (2012). Children’s concept of probability as inferred from their binary choices—revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(2), 207–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontanari, L., Gonzalez, M., Vallortigara, G., & Girotto, V. (2014). Probabilistic cognition in two indigenous Mayan groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(48), 17075–17080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girotto, V., Fontanari, L., Gonzalez, M., Vallortigara, G., & Blaye, A. (2016). Young children do not succeed in choice tasks that imply evaluating chances. Cognition, 152, 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. R. (1991). A longitudinal study of pupil’s probability concepts. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Statistics (vol. 1, pp. 320–328). The Hague, the Netherlands: Isi Publications in Statistical Education.

  • Hoemann, H. W., & Ross, B. M. (1971). Children’s understanding of probability concepts. Child Development, 221-236.

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. Norton, New York: Routledge (Original work published 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzel, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Lehmann, R., Leutner, D., Neubrand, M., … Schiefele, U. (2004). PISA 2003: Der bildungsstand der jugendlichen in Deutschland - Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs. Munster, Germany: Waxmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., Strauss, S., & Levin, I. (1981). Developmental sequences within and between concepts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46(2), 1–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlaams Ministerie van Onderwijs en Vorming (2010). Ontwikkelingsdoelen en eindtermen voor het gewoon basisonderwijs. [Attainment goals and standards for elementary education]. Retrieved from http://ebl.vlaandren.be/publications/documents/36473

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Grant KU Leuven project C16/16/001 “Development and stimulation of core mathematical competencies.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology, KU Leuven, Dekenstraat 2 box 3773, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Anne-Sophie Supply & Wim Van Dooren

  2. PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Elfde-Liniestraat 24, B-3500, Hasselt, Belgium

    Stephanie Lem

  3. Methodology of Educational Sciences Research Group, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102 box 3762, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Patrick Onghena

Authors
  1. Anne-Sophie Supply
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wim Van Dooren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephanie Lem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrick Onghena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Sophie Supply.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the social and societal ethics committee of KU Leuven (G-2016 07 591).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all parents of individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PPTX 373 kb)

ESM 2

(SAV 46 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Supply, AS., Van Dooren, W., Lem, S. et al. Assessing young children’s ability to compare probabilities. Educ Stud Math 103, 27–42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09917-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09917-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation