Abstract
Emotions and affect have become an area of interest to mathematics research. However, both tend to be intellectualized and approached as external to and separate from intellect. As far back as in the 1930s, Vygotsky considered the split between affect and intellect as psychology’s greatest defect. To address that defect, over the last 18–24 months of his life, he sketched the barebones of a different psychology but died before he could develop his ideas into a theory of emotions. His ideas provided us with a roadmap for developing an approach in which intellect and affect are united to constitute a central part in the life of the whole person. Such a position, conceived here in dramatic terms, remains virtually unknown, in part because of the unavailability of specific texts and personal notes until a few years ago. In this study, we develop Vygotsky’s seeds and go beyond what he actually stated. We focus our conceptualization of affect on mathematics classroom practices and exemplify our theoretical perspective with empirical data drawn from a number of studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In dialectics, two opposing terms (e.g., intellect and affect) not only form a unity but also are identical such that there is difference at the heart of identity (cf. Marx & Engels, 1975). The expression “unity and identity” (Vygotsky, in Zavershneva & van der Veer, 2018, p. 245) reflects the dual meanings of Marx’s German Einheit and Vygotsky’s Russian edinstvo.
From Roth and Radford (2011, p. 161 French, p. 167 English). Transcription was augmented with permission. The transcription conventions used here include (0.87) = pauses in seconds; ((pounds)) = transcriber’s description; “=” = latching of sounds;:: = lengthening of sound, 0.1 s per colon; [com] = shading indicates correspondence with image to the right; tiENs = capitalization marks emphasis (by means of intonation or intensity); [] = brackets in consecutive lines indicate overlapping speech; . = punctuation marks intonation, period for strongly falling.
References
Attard, C., & Curry, C. (2012). Exploring the use of iPads to engage young students with mathematics. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 75–82). Singapore: MERGA.
Bailey, J. (2014). Mathematical investigations for supporting pre-service primary teachers repeating a mathematics education course. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 86–100.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Batchelor, S., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2019). Affect and mathematics in young children: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100, 201–209.
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, NY: E. P. Dutton.
Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians’ mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 127–147.
Butler, J., & Scott, J. (Eds.). (1992). Feminists theorize the political. New York, NY: Routledge.
Clarke, D. (2015). Reaction to section 1: Faith, hope and charity: Theoretical lenses on affect. In B. Pepin & B. Roesken-Winter (Eds.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education (pp. 119–134). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Code, L. (1995). Rhetorical spaces: Essays on gendered locations. New York, NY: Routledge.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
Dewey, J. (2008). Art as experience. In J.-A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works 1925–1953 vol. 10. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press (First published in 1934).
Dowker, A., Cheriton, O., Horton, R., & Mark, W. (2019). Relationships between attitudes and performance in young children’s mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100, 211–230.
Evans, J. (2000). Adults’ mathematical thinking and emotions. A study of numerate practices. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
Foucault, M. (1988). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldin, G. A. (2004). Characteristics of affect as a system of representation. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Psychology of Mathematics Education vol. 1 (pp. 109–114). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
Hannula, M. S. (2004). Introduction—RF01: Affect in mathematics education—Exploring theoretical frameworks. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Psychology of Mathematics Education vol. 1 (pp. 107–109). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). System der Wissenschaft. Erster Teil, die Phänomenologie des Geistes [system of science. Part 1, the phenomenology of spirit]. In Bamberg & Würzburg. Germany: Joseph Anton Goebhardt.
Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2015). Vicious cycles of identifying and mathematizing: A case study of the development of mathematical failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24, 504–549.
Holzkamp, K. (1993). Lernen: Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung [Learning: Foundation in a science oft he subject]. In Frankfurt/M. Germany: Campus.
Il’enkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays on its history and theory. Moscow, USSR: Progress.
James, W. (1909). The pluralistic universe. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
Lacan, J. (1977). The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. London, UK: Hogarth Press.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow, USSR: Progress.
Malmivuori, M.-L. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 149–164.
Mannheim, K. (2004). Beiträge zur Theorie der Weltanschauungs-Interpretation. In J. Strübing & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Methodologie interpretativer Sozialforschung: Klassische Grundlagentexte (pp. 103–153). Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1975). Werke Band 20. Berlin, Germany: Dietz.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). Werke Band 3. Berlin, Germany: Dietz.
Mead, G. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, G. H. (1972). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception [Phenomenology of perception]. Paris, France: Gallimard.
Mikhailov, F. T. (2001). The “other within” for the psychologist. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 39(1), 6–31.
Nietzsche, F. (1967). The will to power. New York, NY: Random House.
Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). “Accepting emotional complexity”: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 193–207.
Planalp, S. (1999). Communicating emotion: Social, moral, and cultural processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Politzer, G. (1928). Critique des fondements de la psychologie. Paris, France: Rieder.
Politzer, G. (1929). Les fondements de la psychologie: Psychologie mythologique et psychologie scientifique. La Revue de la Psychologie Concrète, 1, 9–64.
Radford, L. (2012). Education and the illusions of emancipation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 101–118.
Ricœur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Roth, W.-M. (2011). Geometry as objective science in elementary classrooms: Mathematics in the flesh. New York, NY: Routledge.
Roth, W.-M. (2015). Meaning and the real life of language: Learning from “pathological” cases in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 30, 42–55.
Roth, W.-M. (2016). On the social nature of mathematical reasoning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 36(2), 34–39.
Roth, W.-M. (2019). Transactional psychology of education: Toward the social in a strong sense. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Roth, W.-M. (forthcoming). Adventures in mind and mathematics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
Scherer, K. R. (1989). Vocal correlates of emotional arousal and affective disturbance. In H. Wagner & A. Manstead (Eds.), Handbook of social psychophysiology (pp. 165–197). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2017). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Theoretical considerations and empirical contributions. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 49, 307–322.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009). The corporeal turn: An interdisciplinary reader. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). The primacy of movement (2nd ed.). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Turner, J. C., Warzon, K. B., & Christensen, A. (2010). Motivating mathematics learning: Changes in teachers’ practices and beliefs during a nine-month collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 718–762.
Veresov, N. (2004). Zone of proximal development (ZPD): The hidden dimension? In A.-L. Østern & R. Heilä-Ylikallio (Eds.), Språk som kultur—betydningar i tid och rum (pp. 13–30). Vasa, Sweden: Åbo Akademi.
Vološinov, V. N. (1930). Marksizm i folosofija jazyka: osnovye problemy sociologičeskogo metoda b nauke o jazyke [Marxism and the philosophy of language: Main problems of the sociological method in linguistics]. Leningrad, USSR: Priboj.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1: Problems of general psychology. New York, NY: Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 53–77.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions. New York, NY: Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 6: Scientific legacy. New York, NY: Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2010). Two fragments of personal notes by L. S. Vygotsky from the Vygotsky family archive. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(1), 91–96.
Walden, R., & Walkerdine, V. (1982). Girls and mathematics: The early years: A review of literature and an account of original research. London, UK: University of London Institute of Education.
Walshaw, M. (1999). Paradox, partiality and promise: A politics for girls in school mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. In Massey University. New Zealand: Palmerston North.
Walshaw, M. (2014). Who can know mathematics? For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(2), 2–6.
Whitehead, A. N. (1919). An enquiry concerning the principles of natural knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 113–121.
Zavershneva, E., & van der Veer, R. (Eds.). (2018). Vygotsky’s notebooks: A selection. Singapore: Springer.
Zavershneva, E. I. (2010a). The Vygotsky family archive: New findings. Notebooks, notes, and scientific journals of L. S. Vygotsky (1912–1934). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(1), 34–60.
Zavershneva, E. I. (2010b). The way to freedom. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(1), 61–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roth, WM., Walshaw, M. Affect and emotions in mathematics education: toward a holistic psychology of mathematics education. Educ Stud Math 102, 111–125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09899-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09899-2