Abstract
The research is a study of the Husserlian approach to intuition, informed by Merleau-Ponty’s theory of perception, in the case of a prospective teacher of mathematics. It explores the two major stages-categories of intuition, the essential relations between them, and their vital role in the emergence of empirical and abstract mathematical objects, as they are used by the student in order to conceptualise mathematical phenomena. The student’s activity is analysed to its intuitive origins, and an intuition of essences manifests its significance for generalisations and insights for mathematical proofs. Through an in depth phenomenological data analysis, intuition is delineated as an essential mediator between the learner’s world-as-lived and her objectification process. Finally, some implications for teaching and learning are suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This issue also amounts to the difference between Kant’s representation and Husserl’s re-presentation, which exceeds the space limitations of this paper.
The body as (intentional) subject, not as an object (cf. Reuter, 1999, pp. 71–72).
The extract is from Merleau-Ponty’s notes on Husserl’s Origin of Geometry.
Examples of a categorial intuition and an intuition of essences are given in sections 5.3.2, 5.3.4 respectively.
It doesn’t mean that we suppose intuitive processes to be limited to individual processes: we acknowledge that for the fullest understanding of intuitive processes in the learning practice attention needs also to be paid to the social-cultural dimensions, as it is attempted in Andrà & Santi, 2013, Andrà & Liljedahl, 2014.
A different perspective of this session appears at a paper that was published recently (Brown, Heywood, Solomon, & Zagorianakos, 2013).
The picture is included with the permission of the student.
The application of her new object in her technique is also perceived as a better apprehension of the newly-constituted object (cf. section 2.4).
References
Andrà, C., & Santi, G. (2013). Intuitive thinking in a context of learning. In A. Lindmeier & A. Heinzeet (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 25–32). Kiel, Germany: PME.
Andrà, C., & Liljedahl, P. (2014). ‘I sense’ and ‘I can’: Framing intuitions in social interactions. In C. Nico, P. Liljedahl, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 2, pp. 49–56). Vancouver, Canada: PME.
Beth, E. W., & Piaget, J. (1966). Mathematical epistemology and psychology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Brown, T. (2012). Mathematics education and subjectivity. New York: Springer.
Brown, T., Heywood, D., Solomon, Y., & Zagorianakos, A. (2013). Experiencing the space we share: Rethinking subjectivity and objectivity. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 561–572.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.
deFreitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2012). Diagram, gesture, agency: Theorizing embodiment in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 133–152.
Drummond, J. (2007). Historical dictionary of Husserl’s philosophy. New York: Scarecrow Press.
Fischbein, E. (1920/1994). Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fischbein, E. (1999). Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 11–50.
Fischbein, E. (2001). Tacit models and infinity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 309–329.
Hadamard, J. (1954). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. London: Dover Publications.
Heidegger, M. (2004). What is called thinking? New York: Perennial.
Held, K. (2003). Husserl’s phenomenological method. In D. Welton (Ed.), The new Husserl (pp. 3–31). Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Hintikka, J. (1995). The phenomenological dimension. In B. Smith & D. W. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Husserl (pp. 78–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hintikka, J. (1972). Kantian intuitions, Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 15(1–4), 341–345.
Hintikka, J. (2003). The notion of intuition in Husserl. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 224, 169–191.
Husserl, E. (1970a). Logical investigations. (D. Carr, Trans.). New York: Humanities Press.
Husserl, E. (1970b). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Translated, with an Introduction, by David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Husserl, E. (1973). Experience and judgment. (J. Churchill & K. Amerikas, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Husserl, E. (1983a). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First Book, General introduction to a pure phenomenology. (F. Kersten, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Husserl, E. (1983b). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Third Book, General introduction to a pure phenomenology. (T. Klein & W. Pohl, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Husserl, E. (1989a). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Second Book, Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Husserl, E. (1989b). The origin of geometry. (D. Carr, Trans.). In J. Derrida, Edmund Husserl’s origin of geometry: An introduction (pp. 155–180). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1936)
Husserl, E. (1991). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893–1917). (Translated by J. Brough.) Dordrecht: Kluwer, A. P.
Husserl, E. (2001). Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic. (Translated by A. Steinbock.) Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kolen, F. (2005). An interpretation of Husserl’s concept of constitution in terms of symmetry. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Analecta Husserliana (Vol. 88, pp. 307–314). London: Springer.
Lakatos, I. (1978). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lester, S. (1999). An introduction to phenomenological research. Taunton UK, Stan Lester Developments. Retrieved from http://www.sld.demon.co.uk/resmethy.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2012.
Lohmar, D. (2010). Intuition in mathematics: On the function of eidetic variation in mathematical proofs. In M. Haritmo (Ed.), Phenomenology and mathematics (Vol. 195, pp. 73–90). Dordrecht: Springer.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002a). Husserl at the limits of phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002b). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks California: Sage Publications.
Moutsios-Rentzos, A., Spyrou, P., & Peteinara, A. (2014). The objectification of the right-angled triangle in the teaching of the Pythagorean Theorem: An empirical investigation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 29–51.
Otte, M. (1998). Limits of constructivism: Kant, Piaget and Peirce. Science & Education, 7, 425–450.
Polya, G. (1988). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton Science Library.
Radford, L. (2010). The eye as a theoretician: Seeing structures in generalizing activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), 2–7.
Radford, L. (2013). Three key concepts of the theory of objectification: Knowledge, knowing, and learning. REDIMAT-Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 7–44. doi:10.4471/redimat.2013.19
Radford, L. (2014). Phenomenology, praxis, and the question of mathematical objects. Educación Matemática, número especial, 25, 124–145.
Reuter, M. (1999). Merleau-Ponty’s notion of pre-reflective intentionality. Synthese, 118, 69–88.
Roth, M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective in mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Smith, W. D. (2007). Husserl. New York: Routledge.
Steinbring, H. (1991). Mathematics in teaching processes. The disparity between teacher and student knowledge. Recherches des Mathématiques, 11(1), 65–108.
Tito, J. M. (1990). Logic in the Husserlian context. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Tragesser, R. (1977). Phenomenology and logic. London: Cornell University Press.
van Hiele, M. (1986). Structure and insight. London: Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zagorianakos, A., Shvarts, A. The role of intuition in the process of objectification of mathematical phenomena from a Husserlian perspective: a case study. Educ Stud Math 88, 137–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9576-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9576-9