Abstract
Beliefs about mathematics education and their influences on teaching practices have been widely investigated in recent decades. There have been numerous empirical studies on the influences of religions on teachers’ and students’ beliefs about subjects such as sciences and language. However, the influences of worldviews in general and religions in particular, as one of the major sources of beliefs in relation to mathematics education, are under-researched. The current study is a first step to unpacking the relationship between teachers’ religions and their beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning. By means of semi-structured interviews with mathematics teachers of different religious backgrounds, teachers’ perceptions on the connection between their personal religious beliefs and their beliefs about teaching and learning are investigated. In-depth analyses of the perceptions of three mathematics teachers reveal the complex relationship between teachers’ religious beliefs and their teaching beliefs. First, there are some common values shared by different religions, which influence the beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning as well as education in general. Second, religion is a rich belief system, and the teachers appear to apply only a portion of their religious beliefs to guide their teaching. It is also possible that a teacher is influenced by more than one religion or cultural tradition. Despite its subtleties, our study provides evidence to support the alignment between teachers’ personal religious beliefs and their beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Different terminologies such as “conception”, “belief”, “view”, and “image” have been used in the literature. Although it has been argued that there may be subtle differences (Philipp, 2007), we use these terms interchangeably in our study.
Referring to Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism
Carol did not explain what Chinese classics she read. However, we inferred from our interview that she was referring to the Confucian Canon of Four Books.
Five cardinal human relations (wu lun) is an important tenet in Confucianism. It “refers to the five dyadic relationships between ruler and minister, father and son, husband and wife, older and younger brother, and friends” (Sun, 2013, pp. 11–12).
Ji He Yuan Ben is the Chinese title of the Elements translated by Xu Guang-qi.
Advanced Level
“Cyclic existence” (or samsara) is one of the core Buddhist doctrines. It means that one continues to be reborn in the various forms of existence, no matter whether human, animal, or as other beings.
Diploma of Secondary Education examination, taken at the end of 6 years of secondary school study.
References
Aflalo, E. (2013). Religious belief: The main impact on the perception of the nature of science on student teachers. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8, 623–41.
Amir, G. S., & Williams, J. S. (1999). Cultural influences on children’s probabilistic thinking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(1), 85–107.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching international students. In J. Biggs (Ed.), Teaching for quality learning at university. What the student does (pp. 121–40). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
BoudJaoude, S., Asghar, A., Wiles, J., Jaber, L., Sarieddine, D., & Alters, B. (2010). Biology professors’ and teachers’ positions regarding biological evolution and evolution education in a Middle Eastern society. In M. F. Taşar & G. Çakmakci (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: International perspectives—A collection of papers presented at ESERA 2009 conference (pp. 195–206). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
BouJaoude, S., Wiles, J. R., Asghar, A., & Alters, B. (2011). Muslim Egyptian and Lebanese students’ conceptions of biological evolution. Science & Education, 20, 895–915.
Brem, S. K., Banney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87, 181–206.
Cai, J., Perry, B., Wong, N. Y., & Wang, T. (2009). What is effective teaching? A study of experienced mathematics teachers from Australia, the Mainland China, Hong Kong-China, and the United States. In J. Cai, G. Kaiser, B. Perry, & N. Y. Wong (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perspectives—National and cross-national studies (pp. 1–36). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publications.
Chan, Y. C., Wong, N. Y., & Leu, Y. C. (2012). Do teachers with different religious beliefs hold different values in math and math teaching? In T. Y. Tso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, p. 254). Taipei, Taiwan: PME.
Chen, C., Stevenson, H. W., Hayward, G., & Burgess, S. (1995). Culture and academic achievement: Ethnic and cross-national differences. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Culture, motivation, and achievement (Vol. 9, pp. 119–51). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Clément, P., Quessada, M. P., Munoz, F., Laurent, C., Valente, A., & Carvalho, G. S. (2010). Creationist conceptions of primary and secondary school teachers in nineteen countries. In M. F. Taşar & G. Çakmakci (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: International perspectives—A collection of papers presented at ESERA 2009 conference (pp. 447–52). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
Cobern, W. W. (1991). World view theory and science education research (NARST monograph 3). Manhattan, Kansas: Kansas State University.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–45.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Dordrecht Kluwer Academic Publications.
Furinghetti, F. (1997). On teachers’ conceptions: From a theoretical framework to school practice. In G. A. Makrides (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics (pp. 277–87). Cyprus: Cyprus Pedagogical Institute and Cyprus Mathematical Society.
Gray, E., & Tall, D. (1994). Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic. The Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 115–41.
Habermas, R. T. (1993). Practical dimensions of imago Dei. Christian Education Journal, 13(2), 83–92.
Heie, H. (2002). Developing a Christian perspective on the nature of mathematics. In A. C. Migliazzo (Ed.), Teaching as an act of faith (pp. 95–116). New York: Fordham University Press.
Hill, P. (2005). Measurement in the psychology of religion and spirituality: Current status and evaluation. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 43–61). New York: The Guilford Press.
Howell, R. W., & Bradley, W. J. (Eds.). (2001). Mathematics in a postmodern age—A Christian perspective. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Howell, R. W., & Bradley, W. J. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics through the eyes of faith. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Kanitz, L. (2005). Improving Christian worldview pedagogy: Going beyond mere Christianity. Christian Higher Education, 4(2), 99–108.
Lakatos, I. (1976). In J. Worrall & E. G. Zahar (Eds.), Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leatham, K. (2006). Viewing mathematics teachers’ beliefs as sensible systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 91–102.
Lee, W. O. (1996). The cultural context for Chinese learners: Conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 25–41). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong; Melbourne, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research.
Leu, Y. C. (2005). The enactment and perception of mathematics pedagogical values in an elementary classroom: Buddhism, Confucianism, and curriculum reform. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 175–212.
Leu, Y. C., Chan, Y. C., & Wong, N. Y. (2014). The relationships between religious beliefs and teaching among mathematics teachers in the Chinese mainland, Taiwan and Hong Kong. In L. F. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese teach mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. Singapore: World Scientific. Book chapter accepted for publication.
Leu, Y. C., & Wu, C. J. (2004). The mathematics pedagogical values delivered by an elementary teacher in her mathematics instruction: Attainment of higher education and achievement. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 225–32). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
Mansour, N. (2008). The experiences and personal religious beliefs of Egyptian science teachers as a framework for understanding the shaping and reshaping of their beliefs and practices about Science-Technology-Society (STS). International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1605–34.
Martin-Hansen, L. M. (2008). First-year college students’ conflict with religion and science. Science and Education, 17, 317–57.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Norton, A. (2002a). Mathematicians’ religious affiliations and professional practices: The case of Joseph. The Mathematics Educator, 12(1), 17–23. Georgia: University of Georgia.
Norton, A. (2002b). Mathematicians’ religious affiliations and professional practices: The case of Charles. The Mathematics Educator, 12(2), 28–33. Georgia: University of Georgia.
Norton, A. (2003). Mathematicians’ religious affiliations and professional practices: The case of Bo. The Mathematics Educator, 13(1), 41–45. Georgia: University of Georgia.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook on research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 257–315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Pierie, S., & Kieren, T. (1989). A recursive theory of mathematical understanding. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(3), 7–11.
Pierie, S., & Kieren, T. (1992). Watching Sandy’s understanding grow. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11(3), 243–57.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.
Sharma, S. (2006). Personal experiences and beliefs in probabilistic reasoning: Implications for research. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 33–54.
Siu, M. K. (2008). Proof as a practice of mathematical pursuit in a cultural, socio-political and intellectual context. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(3), 355–61.
Skott, J. (2009). Contextualising the notion of ‘belief enactment’. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 27–46.
Speer, N. M. (2005). Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 361–91.
Stemhagen, K., & Smith, J. W. (2008). Dewey, democracy, and mathematics education: Reconceptualizing the last bastion of curricular certainty. Education and Culture, 24(2), 25–40.
Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.
Stone, H. W., & Duke, J. O. (1996/2006). How to think theologically (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress Press.
Sun, C. T.-L. (2013). Themes in Chinese psychology (2nd ed.). Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia.
Sun, X. H., Wong, N. Y., & Lam, C. C. (2005). Bianshi problem as the bridge from “entering the way” to “transcending the way”: The cultural characteristic of Bianshi problem in Chinese math education. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education, 9(2), 153–72.
Sutcliffe, R. (2009). A Christian perspective on mathematics. In D. Downey & S. Porter (Eds.), Christian worldview and the academic disciplines: Crossing the academy (pp. 299–314). Hamilton, Ontario: Pickwick Publications.
Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 105–27.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In A. D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 127–46). New York: Macmillan.
Tymoczko, T. (1998). New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (revised and expanded edition). New Jersey: Princeton.
Watkins, D. A. (2008, February). Learning-centered teaching: An Asian perspective. Keynote address at the 2nd International Conference on Learner-centered Education, Manila, the Philippines.
Wen, S. C., & Leu, Y. K. (2004). The consistency and inconsistency between an elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice [in Chinese]. Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, 17(2), 23–52.
White, M. J. (2006). Plato and mathematics. In H. H. Benson (Ed.), A companion to Plato (pp. 228–43). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Wilder, R. L. (1952). The cultural setting of mathematics. In R. L. Wilder (Ed.), Introduction to the foundations of mathematics (Chapter XII, pp. 281–299). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Wong, N. Y. (1993). The psychosocial environment in the Hong Kong mathematics classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 303–9.
Wong, N. Y. (2004). The CHC learner’s phenomenon: Its implications on mathematics education. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 503–34). Singapore: World Scientific.
Wong, N. Y. (2007). Hong Kong teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39, 301–14.
Wong, N. Y. (2009). Exemplary mathematics lessons: What lessons we can learn from them? ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 379–84.
Wong, M. S., Kristjánsson, C., & Dörnyei, Z. (2013). Christian faith and English language teaching and learning: Research on the interrelationship of religion and ELT. Oxford: Routledge.
Wong, N. Y., Marton, F., Wong, K. M., & Lam, C. C. (2002). The lived space of mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 25–47.
Wong, N. Y., & Tang, K. C. (2012). Mathematics education in Hong Kong under colonial rule. BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics, 27(2), 119–25.
Wong, N. Y., Wong, W. Y., & Wong, E. W. Y. (2012). What do the Chinese value in (mathematics) education? ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(1), 9–19.
Zhang, Q. P., & Wong, N. Y. (2014). Beliefs, knowledge and teaching: A series of studies among Chinese mathematics teachers. In L. F. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese teach mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. Singapore: World Scientific. Book chapter accepted for publication.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all teachers who contributed to this study. We are grateful to Prof. Chi-Chung Lam and Prof. Corinne Maxwell-Reid for commenting on an early draft of the manuscript. Special thanks also to the three anonymous reviewers and the editor Dr. Norma Presmeg for their critical yet constructive comments. This work was financially supported by The Chinese University of Hong Kong Research Committee Funding (Direct Grants) (Project Code: 2080082). The errors and inconsistencies remain our own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix. Open-ended questions of the questionnaire
Appendix. Open-ended questions of the questionnaire
(The original questions were in Chinese. The following are English translations of the questions.)
-
1.
Why did you decide to become a mathematics teacher?
-
2.
What kind of qualities do you expect to nurture in your students?
-
3.
Some students marginally handle unfamiliar topics in mathematics curriculum such as algebra but find that they do not really need such mathematical knowledge in their occupation and daily life. Furthermore, some students do not have interest and do not understand what they learn in mathematics but still can get a quite good academic result. How do you face these phenomena in your teaching?
-
4.
Some people think that probability is not suitable to be taught to students: dices and playing cards are usually used as examples and hence it is a gambling-related topic. Suppose the Education Bureau asks your opinions on adding or removing topics in mathematics curriculum. How will you react?
-
5.
Are there any mathematics topics or mathematics teaching methods which are in conflict with your religious beliefs? If so, how would you handle them?
-
6.
Are there any mathematics topics or mathematics teaching methods which can demonstrate your religious beliefs? Can you give some examples as an illustration.
-
7.
Do you think there is any difference between a teacher who believes in X and one who does not believe in X? (Remark: X is the religion which the respondent subscribes. For the respondent who does not subscribe to any religion, the question is read as: Do you think there is any difference between a teacher who subscribes to a religion and one who does not?)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chan, YC., Wong, NY. Worldviews, religions, and beliefs about teaching and learning: perception of mathematics teachers with different religious backgrounds. Educ Stud Math 87, 251–277 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9555-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9555-1