Skip to main content
Log in

Motor Skill Performance by Low SES Preschool and Typically Developing Children on the PDMS-2

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the motor skill performance of preschool children from low socioeconomic (SES) backgrounds to their age matched typically developing peers using the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2). Sixty-eight children (34 low SES and 34 typically developing; ages 3–5) performed the PDMS-2. Standard scores from each subtest (i.e., stationary, locomotion, object manipulation, grasping, and visual-motor integration) and three quotient scores were calculated for the children identified as low SES and typically developing children. A MANOVA was used to analyze the PDMS-2 standard score and quotient score differences between the children identified as low SES and the typically developing children. All preschool children identified as low SES scored at average or lower on total motor quotient scores. Specifically, 88.2 % of children identified as low SES were classified as average, and 11.8 % of children were in the below average performance category. The MANOVA analysis showed that children identified as low SES scored significantly lower than the typically developing children on the visual-motor integration subtest, F(1,64) = 7.232, p = .009; locomotion subtest, F(1,64) = 11.449, p = .001; and TMQ, F(1,64) = 4.732, p = .033. Children identified as low SES were significantly delayed in both fine and gross motor skill areas when compared to their typically developing age and gender matched peers. Researchers are recommended to provide comprehensive assessments for preschool children and to include motor tasks when designing early intervention programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardid, F., Deconinck, F. J. A., Descamps, S., Verhoeven, L., De Pooter, G., Lenoir, M., & D’Hondt, E. (2013). The effectiveness of a fundamental motor skill intervention in pre-schoolers with motor problems depends on gender but not environmental context. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4571–4581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellows, L. L., Davies, P. L., Anderson, J., & Kennedy, C. (2013). Effectiveness of a physical activity intervention for Head Start preschoolers: A randomized intervention study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. G. (2010). Improving fine motor skills in young children: An intervention study. Educational Psychology in Practice, 26, 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, B. C., & Louie, L. H. T. (2013). Differences in children’s gross motor skills between two types of preschools. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 116, 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. E., & Metcalfe, J. S. (2002). The mountain of motor development: A metaphor. In J. E. Clark & J. H. Humphrey (Eds.), Motor development: Research and review (pp. 62–95). Reston, VA: NASPE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cools, W., De Martelaer, K., Samaey, C., & Andries, C. (2008). Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: A review of seven movement skill assessment tools. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 8, 154–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, C. E., Achmat, M., Forbes, J., & Lambert, E. V. (2012). Impact of a community-based programme for motor development on gross motor skills and cognitive function in preschool children from disadvantaged settings. Early Child Development and Care, 182, 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folio, M. R., & Fewell, R. R. (2000). Peabody Developmental Motor Scales: Examiner’s manual (2nd ed.). Austin TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodway, J. D., & Branta, C. F. (2003). Influence of a motor skill intervention on fundamental motor skill development of disadvantaged preschool children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. L. (2007). Movement assessment battery for children (2nd ed.). London UK: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. L. (2010). The importance of motor skill in general development. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 52, 888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R., & Cavanaugh, J. (2014). Human development: A life-span view (7th ed.). Boston MA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, M. A., & Rhodes, R. E. (2011). Motor skill interventions to improve fundamental movement skills of preschoolers with developmental delays. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 28, 210–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T., & Breslin, C. (2013). Fine and gross motor performance of the MABC-2 by children with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing children. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 1244–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, S. W., Robinson, L. E., & Getchell, N. (2011a). The comparison of performances of preschool children on two motor assessments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113, 715–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, S. W., Robinson, L. E., Wilson, A. E., & Lucas, W. A. (2011b). Getting the fundamentals of movement: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38, 305–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maring, J. R., & Elbaum, L. (2007). Concurrent validity of the early intervention developmental profile and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 19, 116–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhillips, M., & Jordan-Black, J. A. (2007). The effect of social disadvantage on motor development in children: A comparative study. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 1214–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2002). Active start: A statement of physical activity guidelines for children birth to five years. Washington, DC: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2011). Active start: A statement of guidelines for children from birth to age 5, 2nd edition. Retrieved from https://columbus.gov/uploadedFiles/Public_Health/Content_Editors/Planning_and_Performance/Healthy_Children_Healthy_Weights/NASPE%20Active%20Start.pdf.

  • Pope, M., Breslin, C., Getchell, N., & Liu, T. (2012). Using constraints to design developmentally appropriate movement activities for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 83(2), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, M. L., Liu, T., & Getchell, N. (2011). Object-control skills in Hispanic preschool children enrolled in head start. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112, 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provost, B., Heimerl, S., & Lopez, B. R. (2007). Levels of gross and fine motor development in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 27, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. E. (2011). The relationship between perceived physical competence and fundamental motor skills in preschool children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 37, 589–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. E., Webster, E. K., Logan, S. W., Lucas, W. A., & Barber, L. T. (2012). Teaching practices that promote motor skills in early childhood settings. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40, 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, C. B. (1973). Movement of the young child ages two to six. Columbus OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stagnitti, K., Malakellis, M., Kenna, R., Kershaw, B., Hoare, M., & de Silva-Sanigorski, A. (2011). Evaluating the feasibility, effectiveness and acceptability of an active play intervention for disadvantaged preschool children: A pilot study. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 36, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stodden, D. F., Goodway, J. D., Langendorfer, S. J., Roberton, M. A., Rudisill, M. E., Garcia, C., & Garcia, L. E. (2008). A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest, 60, 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. R., & Karen, E. (1985). Gender difference across age in motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tieman, B. L., Palisano, R. J., & Sutlive, A. C. (2005). Assessment of motor development and function in preschool children. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disorders, 11, 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi, R., Joshua, A. M., Kotian, M. S., & Tedla, J. S. (2008). Normal motor development of Indian children on Peabody Developmental Motor Scalces-2 (PDMS-2). Pediatric Physical Therapy, 20, 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, P. (2008). The physical activity levels of preschool-aged children: A systematic review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(4), 547–558. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D. (2000). Test of gross motor development (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Waelvelde, H., & Peersman, W. (2007). Convergent validity between two motor tests: Movement-ABC and PDMS-2. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 24, 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanvuchelen, M., Roeyers, H., & Weerdt, W. (2007). Nature of motor imitation problems in school-aged males with autism: How congruent are the error types? Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlahov, E., Baghurst, T. M., & Mwavita, M. (2014). Preschool motor development: Predicting high school health-related fitness: A prospective study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 119(1), 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. H. (2004). A study on gross motor skills of preschool children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 19, 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiepert, S. L., & Mercer, V. S. (2002). Effects of an increased number of practice trials on Peabody Developmental Gross Motor Scale Scores in children of preschool age with typical development. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 14, 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, T., Hoffmann, C. & Hamilton, M. Motor Skill Performance by Low SES Preschool and Typically Developing Children on the PDMS-2. Early Childhood Educ J 45, 53–60 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0755-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0755-9

Keywords

Navigation