Abstract
Researchers observed pre-kindergarten through second-grade public school classrooms, specifically noting child-centered and teacher-directed pedagogical approaches, by simultaneously examining: (a) student behavior and activities, (b) teacher instructional orientation and rationale, and (c) overall classroom environment. Dissimilar to previous studies, researchers noted the nature of activity structure and various student demographic variables. Additionally, unlike prior classroom observation studies that included an overwhelming percentage of white students, the current study was comprised of a large percentage of Hispanic and African American students. The findings revealed: little to no variation existed in the activities in which young children were engaged in their classrooms, nor in the instructional practices utilized by their early childhood teachers; however, three statistically significant findings showed: (a) students taught by teachers rated as having a higher developmentally appropriate instructional practices (DAIP) scores were more likely to be on-task and less likely to be off-task; (b) students taught by teachers with a higher DAIP score were more likely to be working kinesthetically, answering teacher-posed questions, and freely exploring; and (c) students taught by teachers with a lower DAIP score were more likely to be distracted and/or not engaging in activity. The findings are important, since young children continue to be taught in a direct instructional manner that focuses on students’ test performance—despite research showing the unfavorable effects that highly teacher-centered, scripted classrooms have on young students’ engagement and learning outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alliance for Childhood. (2009). Crisis in the kindergarten: Why children need to play in school. College Park, MD: Author.
Barnett, W. S., Carolan, M. E., Squires, J. H., & Brown, K. C. (2014). The state of preschool 2013. First look. NCES 2014 (Report No. 078). Jessup, MD: National Center for Education Statistics.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2001). Tools of the mind: A case study of implementing the Vygotskian approach in American early childhood and primary classrooms (UNESCO Innodata Monographs: Educational Innovations in Action No. 7). Geneva, Switzerland: International Bureau of Education, UNESCO. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/publications/innodata/inno07.pdf.
Broadhead, P., Wood, E., & Howard, J. (2010). Understanding playful learning and playful pedagogies: Towards a new research agenda. In P. Broadhead, J. Howard, & E. Wood (Eds.), Play and learning in the early years (pp. 177–184). London: Sage.
Brown, C. P., & Mowry, B. (2015). Close early learning gaps with Rigorous DAP. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(7), 53.
Bryant, D. M., Burchinal, M., Lau, L. B., & Sparling, J. J. (1994). Family and classroom correlation of Head Start children’s developmental outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9, 289–309.
Burchinal, M. R., Roberts, J. E., Riggins, R., Jr, Zeisel, S. A., Neebe, R., & Bryant, D. (2000). Relating quality of center-based child care to early cognitive and language development longitudinally. Child Development, 71, 338–357.
Cabell, S. Q., DeCoster, J., LoCasale-Crouch, J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Variation in the effectiveness of instructional interactions across preschool classroom settings and learning activities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(4), 820–830.
Cadima, J., Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., & Buyse, E. (2015). Child engagement in the transition to school: Contributions of self-regulation, teacher–child relationships and classroom climate. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.01.008.
Carlsson-Paige, N., Almon, J., & McLaughlin, G. (2015). Reading instruction in kindergarten: Little to gain and much to lose. Boston, MA: Defending the Early Years; New York, NY: Alliance for Childhood.
Chien, N. C., Howes, C., Pianta, R. C., Burchinal, M., Ritchie, S., Bryant, D. M., et al. (2010). Children’s classroom engagement and school readiness gains in prekindergarten. Child Development, 81(5), 1534–1549.
Cross, A. F., & Conn-Powers, M. (2014). Making the intentional decision to use an effective curriculum to promote children’s learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(6), 361–366.
Degol, J., & Bachman, H. (2015). Preschool teachers’ classroom behavioral socialization practices and low-income children’s self-regulation skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 89–100.
Denver Public Schools. (2015). Overview: Third-party feedback with first-hand knowledge. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://leap.dpsk12.org/Professional-Practice/Observation.
Dougherty, C. (2015). Starting Off Strong: The importance of early learning. Education Digest, 80(6), 12.
File, N., & Gullo, D. F. (2002). A comparison of early childhood and elementary education students’ beliefs about primary classroom teaching practices. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 126–137.
Finn, J. D., & Pannozzo, G. M. (2004). Classroom organization and student behavior in kindergarten. Journal of Educational Research, 98(2), 79–92.
Fredrick, W. C. (1980). Instructional time. Evaluation in Education, 4, 117–118.
Gerde, H. K., Schachter, R. E., & Wasik, B. A. (2013). Using the scientific method to guide learning: An integrated approach to early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(5), 315–323.
Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., & Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic engagement: Current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 328–349.
Han, H. S. (2014). Supporting early childhood teachers to promote children’s social competence: Components for best professional development practices. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(3), 171–179.
Hart, C. H., Burts, D. C., & Charlesworth, R. (1997). Integrated developmentally appropriate curriculum: From theory and research to practice. In C. H. Hart, D. C. Burth, & R. Charlesworth (Eds.), Integrated curriculum and developmentally appropriate practice: Birth to age 8 (pp. 1–27). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Berk, L. E., & Singer, D. G. (2009). A mandate for playful learning in preschool. New York: Oxford.
Hyson, M. C., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Rescorla, L. (1990). The Classroom Practices Inventory: An observation instrument based on NAEYC’s guidelines for developmentally appropriate practices for 4- and 5-year-old children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 475–494.
Jung, E., & Jin, B. (2014). Future professionals’ perceptions of play in early childhood classrooms. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(3), 358.
Katz, L. G. (1999). Curriculum disputes in early childhood education. ERIC clearinghouse on elementary and early childhood education. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://www.ericdigests.org/2000-3/disputes.htm.
Kelly, S., & Turner, J. (2009). Rethinking the effects of classroom activity structure on the engagement of low-achieving students. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1665–1692.
Krummel Reinking, A. (2015). Increasing accountability measures for early childhood teachers using evaluation models: Observation, feedback, and self-assessment. Current Issues in Education, 18(1), 1.
LoCasale-Crouch, J., Konold, T., Pianta, R., Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Bryant, D., et al. (2007). Observed classroom quality profiles in state-funded pre-kindergarten programs and associations with teacher, program, and classroom characteristics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, 3–17.
Loeb, S., Fuller, B., Kagan, S. L., & Carrol, B. (2004). Child care in poor communities: Early learning effects of type, quality, and stability. Child Development, 75(1), 47–65.
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184.
Moore, J. E., Cooper, B. R., Domitrovich, C. E., Morgan, N. R., Cleveland, M. J., Shah, H., et al. (2015). The effects of exposure to an enhanced preschool program on the social-emotional functioning of at-risk children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32(3), 127–138.
National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2003). Position statement: Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/pscape.pdf.
National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2009). Position statement: Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from https://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/position%20statement%20Web.pdf.
National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER). (2008). How can pre-k help children be ready for school? Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://nieer.org/faq/index.php?TAid=132.
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Pianta, R. C. (2003). Standardized classroom observations from pre-k to third grade: A mechanism for improving quality classroom experiences during the P-3 years. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://www.fcd-us.org/resources/standardized-classroom-observations-pre-k-third-grade-mechanism-improving-quality-classroo.
Pianta, R., Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Bryant, D., Clifford, R., Early, D., & Barbarin, O. (2005). Features of pre-kindergarten programs, classrooms, and teachers: Do they predict observed classroom quality and child–teacher interactions? Applied Developmental Science, 9, 144–159.
Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K., Payne, C., Cox, M., & Bradley, R. (2002). The relation of kindergarten classroom environment to teacher, family, and school characteristics and child outcomes. Elementary School Journal, 102(3), 225–238.
Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS). (2010). PEIMS standard reports. Retrieved January 8, 2011, from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/adhocrpt/Standard_Reports.html.
Ranz-Smith, D. J. (2007). Teacher perception of play: In leaving no child behind are teachers leaving childhood behind? Early Education and Development, 18(2), 271–303.
Ross, S. M., & Smith, L. J. (1996). Classroom observation measure observer’s manual. Memphis, TN: University of Memphis, Center for Research in Educational Policy.
Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., Lohr, L., & McNelis, M. M. (1994). Math and reading instruction in tracked first-grade classes. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 105–109.
Ross, S. M., Troutman, A., Horgan, P., Maxwell, S., Laitinen, R., & Lowther, D. (1997). The success of schools in implementing eight restructuring designs: A synthesis of first-year evaluation outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 95–124.
Stanton-Chapman, T. L. (2015). Promoting positive peer interactions in the preschool classroom: The role and the responsibility of the teacher in supporting children’s sociodramatic play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(2), 99–107.
Stipek, D. (2004). Teaching practices in kindergarten and first grade: Different strokes for different folks. Early Childhood Research Quarterly., 19, 548–568.
Stipek, D., & Byler, P. (2004). The early childhood classroom observation measure. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 375–397.
Stright, A. D., & Supplee, L. H. (2002). Children’s self-regulatory behaviors during teacher-directed, seat-work, and small-group instructional contexts. Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 235–244.
Stuhlman, M. W., & Pianta, R. (2009). Profiles of educational quality in first grade. Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 323–342.
Vartuli, S. (1999). How early childhood teacher beliefs vary across grade level—Do they practice what they preach? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 14(4), 489–514.
Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Finding the missing piece: Blocks, puzzles, and shapes fuel school readiness. Trends in Neuroscience & Education, 3, 7–13.
Waxman, H. C. (2003). Systematic classroom observation. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 303–310). New York: Macmillan.
Waxman, H. C., & Padrón, Y. N. (2004). The uses of the classroom observation schedule to improve classroom instruction. In H. C. Waxman, R. G. Tharp, & R. S. Hilberg (Eds.), Observational research in U. S. classrooms: New approaches for understanding cultural and linguistic diversity (pp. 72–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waxman, H. C., Padrón, Y. N., Franco-Fuenmayor, S. E., & Huang, S.-Y. L. (2009). Observing classroom instruction for ELLs from student, teacher, and classroom perspectives. Texas Association for Bilingual Education Journal, 11(1), 63–95.
Waxman, H. C., Tharp, R., & Hilberg, R. S. (Eds.). (2004). Observational research in U.S. classrooms: New approaches for understanding cultural and linguistic diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waxman, H. C., Wang, M. C., Lindvall, C. M., & Anderson, K. A. (1988). Classroom observation schedule technical manual (Rev ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
Waxman, H. C., Wang, M. C., Lindvall, C. M., & Anderson, K. A. (1990). Teacher roles observation schedule technical manual (Rev. Ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
Waxman, H. C., Weber, N. D., Franco-Fuenmayor, S. E., & Rollins, K. B. (2015). Research-based approaches for identifying and assessing effective teaching practices: Challenges, new directions, and policy implications. In Y. Li & J. Hammer (Eds.), Teaching at work (pp. 9–27). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
White House. (2003). President Bush celebrates first anniversary of no child left behind [press release]. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030108-4.html.
Zigler, E. F., Singer, D. G., & Bishop-Josef, S. J. (2005). Children’s play: The Roots of reading. Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Standard
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alford, B.L., Rollins, K.B., Padrón, Y.N. et al. Using Systematic Classroom Observation to Explore Student Engagement as a Function of Teachers’ Developmentally Appropriate Instructional Practices (DAIP) in Ethnically Diverse Pre-kindergarten Through Second-Grade Classrooms. Early Childhood Educ J 44, 623–635 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0748-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0748-8