Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Viewing the changing world of educational technology from a different perspective: Present realities, past lessons, and future possibilities

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review paper focuses on likely reasons for the rhetoric-reality gap in the use of educational information and communication technology. It is based on the assumption that the present challenges being experienced with educational ICT might be avoided in the future if we look at the current challenges from a different perspective, by revisiting past research to gain insights from the history of innovations in educational technology. Seven major lessons emerging from the review could inform future directions so that the future does not simply replicate the disappointing results achieved thus far. We argue that the vision for ICT has been unrealistically ambitious, and review reasons to justify this point of view. We suggest that setting more attainable goals, based on the actuality of educational contexts, might be a more pragmatic way to go in a future of constantly changing educational technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adesote, S., & Fatoki, O. (2013). The role of ICT in the teaching and learning of history in the 21st century. Educational Research Review, 8(21), 2155–2159. doi:10.5897/ERR2013.1617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373–398. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74, 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakia, M. (2000). Costs of ICT use in higher education: What little we know. TechKnowLogia, 2(1), 46–52 www.TechKnowLogia.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, N. (2016). Technology and teacher education: A brief glimpse of the research and practice that have shaped the field. TechTrends, 60(1), 21–29. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0013-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banas, J., & Polly, D. (2016). Instructional design and technology trends in teacher education: An AECT teacher education division special issue of TechTrends. TechTrends, 60(1), 2–3. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0007-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becta (2003). What the research says about using ICT in maths. Becta ICT Research. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDo. Accessed 11 Sept 2015.

  • Bernauer, J. (1996). Technology and leadership. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. April 9-12. ERIC: ED 394 503.

  • Bishop, M., & Elen, J. (2014). Emerging technologies. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 673–674). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blignaut, A., Hinostroza, J., Els, C., & Brun, M. (2010). ICT in education policy and practice in developing countries: South Africa and Chile compared through SITES 2006. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1552–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buettner, Y. (2006). Teaching teachers to teach ICT integration—T3. Education and Information Technologies, 11(3–4), 257–268. doi:10.1007/s10639-006-9007-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, M., & Alves, L. (2007). The implementation and use of computers in education in Brazil: Niterói city/Rio. Computers & Education, 49, 1378–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chigona, A., & Chigona, W. (2010). An investigation of factors affecting the use of ICT for curriculum delivery in the Western Cape, South Africa. In 18th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–12). Pretoria, South Africa. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2010/13327457. Accessed 14 Nov 2011.

  • Connor, C., Goldman, S., & Fishman, B. (2014). Technologies that support students’ literacy development. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 591–604). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. (2005). The research we still are not doing: An agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 80(6), 541–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, F. (2016). Curricular development and ICT: from technological deficit to methodological deficit. Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network Annual Conference. Re-imaging learning environments (pp. 435–447). Budapest.

  • Creating Spaces. (2003). Keys to imagination: ICT in art education. Arts Council England. www.artscouncil.org.uk.

  • Cronje, J. (2016). The future of our field – A STEEP perspective. TechTrends, 60, 5–10. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0009-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorner, H., & Kumar, S. (2016). Online collaborative mentoring for technology integration in pre-service teacher education. TechTrends, 60(1), 48–55. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0016-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunmill, M., & Arslanagic, A. (2006). ICT in arts education: A literature review. Te Puna Puoru National Centre for Research in Music Education and Sound Arts. New Zealand, Commissioned by the New Zealand Ministry of Education: University of Canterbury.

  • Earle, R. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5–13 http://bookstoread.com/etp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falloon, G. (2015). What’s the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Computers & Education, 84, 62–77. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsslund, T. (1991). Factors that influence the use and impact of educational television in school. Journal of Educational Television, 17(1), 15–30. doi:10.1080/1358165910170103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2013). Towards a new end: New pedagogies for deep learning. Seattle Washington: Collaborative impact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabi, F. (2015). Gauteng’s paperless classrooms. In IOLnews Retrieved from http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/gauteng/gauteng-s-paperless-classrooms-1.1804443#.VcspnPmqqko.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi, B., & Hashemi, M. (2011). ICT: New wave in English language learning/teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3098–3102. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, l (Ed.) (2004). Education, art and ICTs: Integration for the development of one’s personality. Final report and selected materials. IITE Expert meeting: 12–13 May 2003, Moscow. Institute for Information Technologies in Education. UNESCO.

  • Green, T., Ponder, J., & Donovan, L. (2014). Educational technology in social sciences education. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 573–582). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greener, S., & Wakefield, C. (2015). Developing confidence in the use of digital tools in teaching. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 260–267 www.ejel.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, W., & Jurich, S. (2002). ICT for education: Potential and potency. In W. Haddad & a. Drexler (Eds.), technologies for education: Potentials, parameters, and prospects (pp. 34–37). Washington DC: Academy for educational development and Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.Unesco.Org/images/0011/001191/ 119129e.Pdf.

  • Hadfield, M., & Jopling, M. (2014). The development of an implementation model for ICT in education: An example of the interaction of affordances and multimodality. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(6), 607–617. doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.924747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamat, A., & Embi, M. (2010). Constructivism in the design of online learning tools. European Journal of Educational Studies, 2(3), 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, N., & Bennett, C. (2002). Discipline differences in role and use of ICT to support group-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 55–63. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00211.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J,, & Hofer, M. (2012). Music learning activity types. Learning activity types web site. College of William and Mary School of Education. http://activitytypes.wm.edu/Music.html.

  • Hauge, T. (2014). Uptake and use of technology: Bridging design for teaching and learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(3), 311-323. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2014.942750.

  • Haydn, T., & Barton, R. (2007). Common needs and different agendas: How trainee teachers make progress in their ability to use ICT in subject teaching. Some lessons from the UK. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1018–1036. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haythornwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-learning: Theory and practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd..

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K., & Cheung, W. (2013). Use of web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47–64. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Webb, M. (2009). Integrating ICT to higher education in China: From the perspective of activity theory. Education and Information Technologies, 14(2), 143–161. doi:10.1007/s10639-008-9084-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inan, F., & Lowther, D. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937–944. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553–564. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9222-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, M. (2013). Mapping out the ICT integration terrain in the school context: Identifying the challenges in an innovative project. Irish Educational Studies, 32(3), 309–333. doi:10.1080/03323315.2013.826398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ continuation of technology use in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1535–1554. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9398-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, U., & Goh, D. (2014). Teaching style, ICT experience and teachers’ attitudes toward teaching with web 2.0. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasavvidis, I. (2009). Activity theory as a conceptual framework for understanding teacher approaches to information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 53, 436–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., Kim, M., Lee, C., Spector, J., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 76–85. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, G., Cornelius, P., Sachs, J., & Schwab, K. (2002). The global information technology report 2001–2002: Readiness for the networked world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tay, L. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. (2008). Comparative analysis of policies for ICT in education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1083–1096). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, K., Dedrick, J., & Sharma, P. (2009). One laptop per child: Vision vs. reality. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 66–73. doi:10.1145/1516046.1516063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K., & Pratt, K. (2004). Secondary schools: The role of the computer coordinator. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., Pelgrum, W., & Plomp, T. (Eds.) (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. CERC Studies in Comparative Education, 23.

  • Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 707–734. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech, D. (1980). What makes television the right medium? Journal of Educational Television, 6(1), 25–30. doi:10.1080/0260741800060108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockee, B., & Wang, F. (2014). Visual arts education. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 583–590). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lucking, R., Bligh, B., Munches, A., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., & Noss, R. (2012). Decoding learning: The proof, promise and potential of digital education. London: Nesta Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/decoding_learning_report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mafokwane, P. (2016). Learning tablet used for music and taking selfies. Sowetan Live. Retrieved from http://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/2016/01/09/learning-tablet-used-for-music-and-taking-selfies. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

  • Makrakis, V. (2005). Training teachers for new roles in the new era: Experiences from the United Arab Emirates ICT Program. In A. Jimoyiannis (Ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd Panhellenic Conference ‘didactics of informatics’ University of Peloponnese Korinthos, Greece. Retrieved from https://www.Researchgate.Net/ publication/228408380. Accessed 02 Jan 2017.

  • Mashaba, S. (2016). Paperless classrooms expand in Gauteng. Sowetan Live. Retrieved from http://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/2016/01/17/paperless-classrooms-expand-in-gauteng. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.

  • McCormick, R., & Scrimshaw, P. (2001). Information and communications technology, knowledge and pedagogy. Education, Communication & Information, 1(1), 37–57. doi:10.1080/14636310120048047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. (1988). New technology and educational television. Journal of Educational Television, 14(1), 5–25. doi:10.1080/0260741880140102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Education Technology Plan. (2016). Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. U.S. Department of Education: Office of Educational Technology Retrieved from http://tech.ed.gov.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2003). Science and computer-based technologies: Attitudes of secondary science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(2), 243–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection, PISA. OECD Publishing. doi 10.1787/9789264239555-en

  • Oppenheimer, T. (1997). The computer delusion. The Atlantic Monthly, 280(1), 45–62 Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1997/07/the-computer-delusion/376899/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions. Bristol: NESTA Futurelab series. Report 6. http://www.Nestafuturelab.Org/Research/ reviews/se01.Htm.

  • Peeraer, J., & van Petegem, P. (2012). Measuring integration of information and communication technology in education: An item response modeling approach. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1247–1259. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelgrum, W., & Law, N. (2003). ICT in education around the world: Trends problems and prospects. Paris: UNESCO Educational Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, F., & Morrison, T. (2013). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT—The hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2002). Practitioner model of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 47–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, D., Duran, J., & Carroll-Miranda, J. (2007). Three years of the New Mexico laptop learning initiative (NMLLI): Stumbling toward innovation. AACE Journal, 15(4), 339–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santayana, G. (1905). The life of reason: The phases of human progress. In Volume 1: Reason in common sense. New York: Dover Publications Inc. Accessed via The Project Gutenberg ebooks http://www.gutenberg.org/files/15000/15000-h/15000-h.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J., Lei, J., Chang, H., & Namdar, B. (2014). Technology-enhanced, modeling-based instruction (TMBI) in science education. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 529–540). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, C., Bolliger, D., Dousay, T., & Persichitte, K. (2016). Preparing teachers for online instruction with a graduate certificate program. TechTrends, 60(1), 41–47. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0015-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šorgo, A., Verčkovnik, T., & Kocijančič, S. (2010). Information and communication technologies (ICT) in biology teaching in Slovenian secondary schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tablets to be withdrawn from Gauteng schools (2015). SAnews.gov.za: South African government news agency. Retrieved from http://www.sanews.gov.za/south-africa/tablets-b-withdrawn-gauteng-schools.

  • Tallvid, M. (2016). Understanding teachers’ reluctance to the pedagogical use of ICT in the 1:1 classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 503–519. doi:10.1007/s10639-014-9335-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2000). Using the world wide web in undergraduate geographic education: Potentials and pitfalls. Journal of Geography, 99(1), 11–22. doi:10.1080/00221000897894349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, A. (1997). Taking technologies measure. Education Week, 17(11), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2004). Education, art and ICTs: Integration for the development of one’s personality. Final report and selected materials. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies In Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J. (2008). IT and curriculum processes: Dilemmas and challenges. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 117–132). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of technology: Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), 2875–2905. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.698763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L., & Parr, J. M. (2008). Translating ICT strategic policy into action: Reaching for the wrong fruit. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 20(3), 52–61.

  • Ward, L., & Parr, J. (2010). Revisiting and reframing use: Implications for the integration of ICT. Computers & Education, 54(1), 113–122. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S., Lee, J., & Najmi, A. (2014). The impact of technology and theory of instructional design since 2000. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 89–99). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2003). Demystifying the digital divide. Scientific American, 289(2), 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA; The MIT Press.

  • Watson, D. (2001). Pedagogy before technology: Rethinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 6(4), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J. (1999). Integrating multimedia into science teaching: Barriers and benefits. School Science Review, 81(295), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J. (2000). Teaching and learning secondary science. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J. (2005). Has ICT come of age? Recurring debates on the role of ICT in education, 1982–2004. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 25–39. doi:10.1080/02635140500068419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, M., & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1:1 laptop initiatives and educational change. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(6), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, J., Dickerson, J., Weaver, C., & Josey, F. (2016). Iterative and event-based frameworks for university and school district technology professional development partnerships. TechTrends, 60(1), 56–61. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0017-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, P O WITS, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa

    Martie Sanders & Ann George

Authors
  1. Martie Sanders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann George
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martie Sanders.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanders, M., George, A. Viewing the changing world of educational technology from a different perspective: Present realities, past lessons, and future possibilities. Educ Inf Technol 22, 2915–2933 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9604-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9604-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation