Abstract
An equitable \((r,c;v)\)-rectangle is an \(r \times c\) matrix \(L=(l_{ij})\) with symbols from \(\mathbb {Z}_v\) in which each symbol appears in every row either \(\left\lceil c/v \right\rceil \) or \(\left\lfloor c/v \right\rfloor \) times and in every column either \(\left\lceil r/v \right\rceil \) or \(\left\lfloor r/v \right\rfloor \) times. We call \(L\) diagonally cyclic if \(l_{(i+1) (j+1)}=l_{ij}+1\), where the rows are indexed by \(\mathbb {Z}_r\) and columns indexed by \(\mathbb {Z}_c\). We give a constructive proof of necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a diagonally cyclic equitable \((r,c;v)\)-rectangle.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asplund J., Keranen M.S.: Mutually orthogonal equitable latin rectangles. Discret. Math. 311, 1015–1033 (2011).
Bose R.C.: On the application of the properties of Galois fields to the construction of hyper-Graeco-Latin squares. Sankhyā 3, 323–338 (1938).
Bryant D., Buchanan M., Wanless I.M.: The spectrum for quasigroups with cyclic automorphisms and additional symmetries. Discret. Math. 304, 821–833 (2009).
Bryant D., Egan J., Maenhaut B., Wanless I.M.: Indivisible plexes in Latin squares. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 52, 93–105 (2009).
Bryant D., Maenhaut B.M., Wanless I.M.: New families of atomic Latin squares and perfect \(1\)-factorisations. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 113, 608–624 (2004).
Cao H., Dinitz J., Kreher D., Stinson D., Wei R.: On orthogonal generalized equitable rectangles. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 51, 225–230 (2009).
Dénes J., Keedwell A.D.: Latin Squares and their Applications. Academic Press, New York (1974).
Drake D.A.: Partial \(\lambda \)-geometries and generalized hadamard matrices over groups. Can. J. Math. 31, 617–627 (1979).
Euler L.: Recherches sur une nouvelle espéce de quarrés magiques, Verh. Zeeuwsch. Gennot. Weten. Vliss. 9, 85–239 (1782). Eneström E530, Opera Omnia OI7, pp. 291–392.
Evans A.B.: Orthomorphism Graphs of Groups. Springer, Berlin (1992).
Guo W., Ge G.: The existence of generalized mix functions. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 50, 107–113 (2009).
Moore E.H.: Tactical memoranda I-III. Am. J. Math. 18, 264–303 (1896).
Ristenpart T., Rogaway P.: How to enrich the message space of a cipher. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 4593, pp. 101–118. Springer, Berlin (2007).
Stinson D.R.: Generalized mix functions and orthogonal equitable rectangles. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 45, 347–357 (2007).
Stones D.S., Vojtěchovský P., Wanless I.M.: Cycle structure of autotopisms of quasigroups and latin squares. J. Comb. Des. 20, 227–263 (2012).
Wanless I.M.: Diagonally cyclic Latin squares. Eur. J. Comb. 25, 393–413 (2004).
Wanless I.M.: Atomic Latin squares based on cyclotomic orthomorphisms. Electron. J. Comb. 12, R22–R23 (2005).
Acknowledgments
Stones supported by NSFC grant 61170301. Stones was also partially supported by AARMS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by L. Teirlinck.
Appendix: Technical lemmata
Appendix: Technical lemmata
In the following lemmata, we say \(p^k\) exactly divides \(n\) if \(p^k\) divides \(n\) and \(p^{k+1}\) does not divide \(n\). For these results, we assume \(r, c\) and \(v\) are arbitrary positive integers, and, as in the rest of the paper,
Lemma 8
Suppose \(v\) divides \({{\mathrm{lcm}}}(r,c)\). Then \(N_{\mathrm {row}}\) and \(N_{\mathrm {col}}\) are positive integers.
Proof
Let \(p\) be a prime. Suppose \(p^a\) exactly divides \(v\), and \(p^b\) exactly divides \(r\) and \(p^x\) exactly divides \(c\). If \(N_{\mathrm {row}}\) is a positive integer, then it would be exactly divisible by \(p^{x+\min (a,b)-a-\min (b,x)}\). Since \(p\) is arbitrary, it is sufficient to show that
as, if \(N_{\mathrm {row}}\) were not a positive integer, then (8) would be false for some prime \(p\). Note that \(a \leqslant \max (b,x)\) since \(v\) divides \({{\mathrm{lcm}}}(r,c)\).
Case I \(\min (a,b)=a\). Then (8) follows immediately.
Case II \(\min (a,b)=b\) and \(\min (b,x)=b\). The left hand side of (8) becomes \(x-a\), which is non-negative, since \(a \leqslant \max (b,x)=x\).
Case III \(\min (a,b)=b\) and \(\min (b,x)=x\). The left hand side of (8) becomes \(b-a\), which is non-negative, since \(a \leqslant \max (b,x)=b\).
We can show that \(N_{\mathrm {col}}\) is a positive integer by switching \(r\) and \(c\).
Lemma 9
Let \(\chi =c\, \gcd (r,v)/\gcd (r,c)\). Then \(\chi \) divides \(c\) if and only if \(\gcd (r,v)\) divides \(c\).
Proof
If \(\gcd (r,v)\) does not divide \(c\), then \(\chi \), which is a multiple of \(\gcd (r,v)\), also does not divide \(c\).
Conversely, assume \(\gcd (r,v)\) divides \(c\). Let \(p\) be a prime. Suppose \(p^a\) exactly divides \(\gcd (r,v)\), and \(p^b\) exactly divides \(\gcd (r,c)\) and \(p^x\) exactly divides \(c\). Hence \(p^{x+a-b}\) exactly divides \(\chi \). Since \(p\) is arbitrary, it is sufficient to show that \(b \geqslant a\). Since \(p^a\) divides \(\gcd (r,v)\), we know \(p^a\) divides \(r\), and since \(\gcd (r,v)\) divides \(c\), we know \(p^a\) also divides \(c\), so \(p^a\) divides \(\gcd (r,c)\). Hence \(b \geqslant a\).\(\square \)
Lemma 10
We have:
-
\(\gcd (r,v)\) divides \(\gcd (r,c)\) if and only if \(vN_{\mathrm {row}}\) divides \(c\) and
-
\(\gcd (c,v)\) divides \(\gcd (r,c)\) if and only if \(vN_{\mathrm {col}}\) divides \(r\).
Proof
The second dot-point is the same as the first with \(r\) and \(c\) switched.\(\square \)
Lemma 11
Suppose \(v\) divides \({{\mathrm{lcm}}}(r,c)\). Suppose also that \(\gcd (r,v)\) divides \(\gcd (r,c)\). Then \(v\) divides \(c\).
Proof
Let \(d\) be a prime power divisor of \(v\). Since \(v\) divides \({{\mathrm{lcm}}}(r,c)\) and \(d\) is a prime power, we know that \(d\) divides \(r\) or \(c\) (or both). Since we want to prove that \(d\) divides \(c\), assume \(d\) divides \(r\). Since \(d\) divides both \(r\) and \(v\), we know that \(d\) divides \(\gcd (r,v)\) and hence \(d\) divides \(\gcd (r,c)\) by assumption. Therefore \(d\) divides \(c\). Since \(d\) is an arbitrary prime power divisor of \(v\), we conclude that \(v\) divides \(c\).\(\square \)
Lemma 12
If \(v\) divides \(\gcd (r,c)\), then \(vN_{\mathrm {row}}\) divides \(c\) and \(vN_{\mathrm {col}}\) divides \(r\).
Proof
If \(v\) divides \(\gcd (r,c)\), then \(v\) divides \(r\) and hence \(v\) divides \(\gcd (r,v)\). But since \(\gcd (r,v)\) divides \(v\), we must have that \(v=\gcd (r,v)\). Hence \(N_{\mathrm {row}}=c/\gcd (r,c)\) and
which divides \(c\) (since \(v\) divides \(\gcd (r,c)\), and \(\gcd (r,c)\) divides \(c\)).
The second claim, that \(vN_{\mathrm {col}}\) divides \(r\), follows from the first claim with \(r\) and \(c\) switched. \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, A.B., Fear, D. & Stones, R.J. Diagonally cyclic equitable rectangles. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 76, 551–569 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-014-9977-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-014-9977-x