Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing the potential impact of climate change on the UK’s electricity network

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate how weather affects the UK’s electricity network, by examining past data of weather-related faults on the transmission and distribution networks. By formalising the current relationship between weather-related faults and weather, we use climate projections from a regional climate model (RCM) to quantitatively assess how the frequency of these faults may change in the future. This study found that the incidences of both lightning and solar heat faults are projected to increase in the future. There is evidence that the conditions that cause flooding faults may increase in the future, but a reduction cannot be ruled out. Due to the uncertainty associated with future wind projections, there is no clear signal associated with the future frequency of wind and gale faults, however snow, sleet and blizzard faults are projected to decrease due to a reduction in the number of snow days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Following the completion of this work the licence areas owned by Central Networks were subsequently purchased in March 2011 by Western Power Distribution.

  2. UKCP09 is the most recent set of climate change scenarios released by the UK Climate Impacts Programme (see http://ukclimateprojections.defra.gov.uk).

References

  • Berrisford P, Dee D, Fielding K et al (2009) The ERA-Interim archive. ERA Report Series 1, European Centre for Medium Range Forecasting (ECMWF)

  • CEH (1999) Flood estimation handbook. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins M, Booth BBB, Harris GR et al (2006) Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change. Clim Dyn 27(2–3):127–147. doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0121-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins M, Booth BBB, Bhaskaran B et al (2011) A comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles: Model errors, feedbacks and forcings. Clim Dyn 36:1737–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ et al (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(656):553–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlingstein P, Cox PM, Betts RA et al (2006) Climate–carbon cycle feedback analysis, results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J Climate 19(14):3337–3353. doi:10.1175/JCLI3800.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon C, Cooper C, Senior CA et al (2000) The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Clim Dyn 16:147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90(8):1095–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RG, Murphy JM, Noguer M (1995) Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional–climate model. I: assessment of control climate, including sensitivity to location of lateral boundaries. Q J R Meteorol Soc 121:1413–1449

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Sheffield J, Wood EF (2010) Bias correction of monthly precipitation and temperature fields from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change AR4 models using equidistant quantile matching. J Geophys Res 115:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauran D, Wetterhall F, Ireson AM et al (2010) Precipitation downscaling under climate change: recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev Geophys 48:RG3003

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Jenkins GJ et al (2009) UK climate projections science report: climate change projections

  • Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, David G et al (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry M, Hollis D (2005) The generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climatic variables over the United Kingdom. Int J Climatol 25:1041–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry M, Hollis D, Elms M (2009) The generation of daily gridded datasets for temperature and rainfall for the UK. Climate memorandum no 24, NCIC

  • Piani C, Haerter JO, Coppola E (2010) Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe. Theor Appl Climatol 99:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton H, Mathison C, Palin E et al (2011) The impact of climate change on the GB rail network. Consultancy report, Met Office Hadley Centre

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was commissioned by the ENA on behalf of the distribution and transmission network operators who funded the work. We would like to thank the study’s working group for their input and advice: David Spillett (ENA), Neil Dunn-Birch (CE Electric), Nigel Johnson (Central Networks), Phil McFarlane (Electricity Northwest), Olympia Siolou (National Grid), David Fidler (National Grid), David Brogden (Scottish and Southern Energy), Jamie McWilliam (Scottish Power Energy Networks), Allan Boardman (UK Power Networks) and Phil West (Western Power Distribution).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynsey McColl.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

PDF (21.5 KB)

PDF (17.6 KB)

PDF (372 KB)

PDF (63 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McColl, L., Palin, E.J., Thornton, H.E. et al. Assessing the potential impact of climate change on the UK’s electricity network. Climatic Change 115, 821–835 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0469-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0469-6

Keywords

Navigation