Skip to main content
Log in

Nanofibrillated cellulose/nanographite composite films

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cellulose Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though research into nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) has recently increased, few studies have considered co-utilising NFC and nanographite (NG) in composite films, and, it has, however been a challenge to use high-yield pulp fibres (mechanical pulps) to produce this nanofibrillar material. It is worth noting that there is a significant difference between chemical pulp fibres and high-yield pulp fibres, as the former is composed mainly of cellulose and has a yield of approximately 50 % while the latter is consist of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, and has a yield of approximately 90 %. NFC was produced by combining TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethypiperidine-1-oxyl)-mediated oxidation with the mechanical shearing of chemi-thermomechanical pulp (CTMP) and sulphite pulp (SP); the NG was produced by mechanically exfoliating graphite. The different NaClO dosages in the TEMPO system differently oxidised the fibres, altering their fibrillation efficiency. NFC–NG films were produced by casting in a Petri dish. We examine the effect of NG on the sheet-resistance and mechanical properties of NFC films. Addition of 10 wt% NG to 90 wt% NFC of sample CC2 (5 mmol NaClO CTMP-NFC homogenised for 60 min) improved the sheet resistance, i.e. from that of an insulating pure NFC film to 180 Ω/sq. Further addition of 20 (CC3) and 25 wt% (CC4) of NG to 80 and 75 wt% respectively, lowered the sheet resistance to 17 and 9 Ω/sq, respectively. For the mechanical properties, we found that adding 10 wt% NG to 90 wt% NFC of sample HH2 (5 mmol NaClO SP-NFC homogenised for 60 min) improved the tensile index by 28 %, tensile stiffness index by 20 %, and peak load by 28 %. The film’s surface morphology was visualised using scanning electron microscopy, revealing the fibrillated structure of NFC and NG. This methodology yields NFC–NG films that are mechanically stable, bendable, and flexible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87(2):963–979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andres B, Forsberg S, Dahlström C, Blomquist N, Olin H (2014) Enhanced electrical and mechanical properties of nanographite electrodes for supercapacitors by addition of nanofibrillated cellulose. Phys Status Solidi B 251(12):2581–2586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist N, Engström A-C, Hummelgård M, Andres B, Forsberg S, Olin H (2016) Large-scale production of nanographite by tube-shear exfoliation in water. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0154686. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco PM, Montes S, Garcia I, Borghei M, Jiang H, Odriozola I, Cabanero G, Ruiz V (2014) High-concentration aqueous dispersions of graphene produced by exfoliation of graphite using cellulose nanocrystals. Carbon 70:157–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Nooy AEJ, Besemer AC, Van Bekkum H (1995) Highly selective nitroxyl radical-mediated oxidation of primary alcohol groups in water-soluble glucans. Carbohydr Res 269(1):89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eda G, Chhowalla M (2009) Graphene-based composite thin films for electronics. Nano Lett 9(2):814–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fall AB, Lindström SB, Sundman O, Ödberg L, Wågberg L (2011) Colloidal stability of aqueous nanofibrillated cellulose dispersions. Langmuir 27(18):11332–11338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci Symp 37:797–813

  • Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA, Sain M (2008) Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review. BioResources 3(3):929–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Miura Y, Macosko CW (2010) Graphene/polyurethane nanocomposites for improved gas barrier and electrical conductivity. Chem Mater 22:3441–3450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiziltas EE, Kiziltas A, Rhodes K, Emanetoglue NW, Blumentritt M, Gardner DJ (2016) Electrically conductive nano graphite-filled bacterial cellulose composites. Carbohydr Polym 136:1144–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Edit 50(24):5438–5466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhu H, Zhu S, Wan J, Liu Z, Vaaland O, Lacey S, Fang Z, Dai H, Li T, Hu L (2015) Hybridizing wood cellulose and graphene oxide toward high-performance fibers. NPG Asia Mater 7:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Luong ND, Pahimanolis N, Hippi U, Korhonen JT, Ruokolainen J, Johansson L-S, Nam J-D, Seppälä J (2011) Graphene/cellulose nanocomposite paper with high electrical and mechanical performances. J Mater Chem 21:13991–13998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma P, Zhai H (2013) Selective TEMPO-mediated oxidation of thermomechanical pulp. BioResources 8(3):4396–4405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malho J-M, Laaksonen P, Walther A, Ikkala O, Linder MB (2012) Facile method for stiff, tough, and strong nanocomposites by direct exfoliation of multilayered graphene into native nanocellulose matrix. Biomacromolecules 13:1093–1099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novoselov KS, Fal’ko VI, Colombo L, Gellert PR, Schwab MG, Kim K (2012) A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490:192–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okita Y, Saito T, Isogai A (2009) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of softwood thermomechanical pulp. Holzforschung 63:529–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7:1687–1691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17(3):459–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 37:815–827

  • Wang F, Drzal LT, Qin Y, Huang Z (2015) Multifunctional graphene nanoplatelets/cellulose nanocrystals composite paper. Compos B 79:521–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan C, Wang J, Kang W, Cui M, Wang X, Foo CY, Chee KJ, Lee PS (2014) Highly stretchable piezoresistive graphene–nanocellulose nanopaper for strain sensors. Adv Mater 26:2022–2027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the KK Foundation in collaboration with MoRe Research and Mid Sweden University as part of the programme Forest as a Resource Industrial Research College (FORIC) at Mid Sweden University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinke H. Osong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Osong, S.H., Dahlström, C., Forsberg, S. et al. Nanofibrillated cellulose/nanographite composite films. Cellulose 23, 2487–2500 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0990-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0990-2

Keywords

Navigation