Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Face of Fairness: Self-Awareness as a Means to Promote Fairness among Managers with Low Empathy

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

These men ask for just the same thing—fairness, and fairness only—Abraham Lincoln

Abstract

Although managing fairness is a critical concern for organizations, not all managers are predisposed to enact high levels of fairness. Emerging empirical evidence suggests that personality characteristics can be an important antecedent of managers’ fair behavior. However, relatively little attention has been devoted to understand how to promote fairness among managers who are naturally predisposed to engage in lower levels of fairness. Building upon self-awareness theory, we argue that increasing managers’ self-awareness can motivate managers with low trait empathy to engage in greater levels of justice. We test the interactive effects of trait empathy and state self-awareness using an experimental study (N = 76) in which individuals were asked to communicate negative news. In support of our hypothesis, our results indicate that increasing self-awareness through self-focusing situations can help promote interactional justice when communicating negative news for individuals with low trait empathy. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although interactional justice is sometimes further separated into interpersonal and informational justice (e.g., Colquitt 2001), we examine interactional justice for a number of reasons. From a theoretical perspective, interpersonal and informational justice are closely related, and both dimensions have the same hypothesized effects in this context. Thus, interactional justice provides a more parsimonious explanation. From an empirical perspective, our results also indicated that interpersonal and informational justice were highly correlated (r = 0.73). Finally, interactional justice has been used extensively in recent research, and our approach is consistent with these studies (e.g., Ambrose and Schminke 2009b; Barclay and Kiefer, in press; Barsky and Kaplan 2007; Spencer and Rupp 2009).

  2. We thank an anonymous reviewer for this point.

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2009a). Assessing roadblocks to justice: A model of fair behavior in organizations. In J. J. Martocchio, H. Liao, & A. Joshi (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 28, pp. 219–263). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2009b). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1–78). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, L. J., & Kiefer, T. (in press). Approach or avoid? Exploring overall justice and the differential effects of positive and negative emotions. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206312441833.

  • Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. (2009). Greenberg doth protest too much: Application always has been, and victims and morality always will be critical for advancing organizational justice research. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 201–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsky, A., & Kaplan, S. A. (2007). If you feel bad it’s unfair: A quantitative synthesis of affect and organizational justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 525–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N., Martin, C. L., Bies, R. J., & Brockner, J. (1995). Coping with a layoff: A longitudinal study of victims. Journal of Management, 21, 1025–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R., & Moag, J. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2001). Justice and empathy: What motivates people to help others? In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 226–250). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, M. S., & Ellis, A. P. (2011). Examining the effects of sleep deprivation on workplace deviance: A self-regulatory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 913–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The temperament and character inventory (TCI) A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology of Personality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., et al. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 199–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., & Shaw, J. C. (2005). How should organizational justice be measured? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 113–152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., De Cremer, D., & Mayer, D. M. (2013). When leaders choose to be fair: Follower belongingness needs and leader empathy influences leaders’ adherence to procedural fairness rules. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, K. A., Samuels, S. M., Ross, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1997). Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: Allocators versus recipients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1061–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duval, T. S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1993). The “Churchill paradox” in managing hard times. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.

  • Folger, R. (1998). Fairness as a moral virtue. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (pp. 13–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (Vol. 1, pp. 3–33). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1998). When tough times make tough bosses: Managerial distancing as a function of layoff blame. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2001). Fairness as a dependent variable: Why tough times can lead to bad management. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Volume II—From theory to practice (pp. 97–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, F. X. (1990). Self-attention and behavior: A review and theoretical update. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 249–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govern, J. M., & Marsch, L. A. (2001). Development and validation of the situational self-awareness scale. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1980). Attentional focus and locus of performance causality as determinants of equity behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair versus being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 111–157). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2001). The seven loose ca(n)nons of organizational justice. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 245–272). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2006). Losing sleep over organizational justice: Attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M. A., Roberson, L., & Rymph, R. D. (1998). What motivates fairness? The role of subordinate assertive behavior on managers’ interactional fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 731–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1971). Observer’s evaluation of a victim: Justice, guilt, and veridical perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Molinsky, A. (2008). Navigating the bind of necessary evils: Psychological engagement and the production of interpersonally sensitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 847–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 836–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P., & Samuelson, C. D. (1985). Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 480–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinsky, A., & Margolis, J. (2005). Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 245–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patient, D. L., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2010). Increasing interpersonal and informational justice when communicating negative news: The role of the manager’s empathic concern and moral development. Journal of Management, 36, 555–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Jones, K. S., & Liao, H. (2014). The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 159–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, B. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Paddock, E. L. (2009). An actor-focused model of justice rule adherence and violation: The role of managerial motives and discretion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 756–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, B. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Justice as a dependent variable: Subordinate charisma as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1597–1609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sentyrz, S. M., & Bushman, B. J. (1998). Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the thinnest one of all? Effects of self-awareness on consumption of full-fat, reduced-fat, and no-fat products. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 944–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., & Duval, T. S. (2001). Objective self-awareness theory: Recent progress and enduring problems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1996). Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1997). Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel Psychology, 50, 617–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S., & Rupp, D. E. (2009). Angry, guilty, and conflicted: Injustice towards coworkers heightens emotional labor through cognitive and emotional mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R. R., & Solodky, M. (1979). Objective self-awareness, standards of evaluation, and moral behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 254–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). Motivation, personal beliefs, and limited resources all contribute to self-control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 943–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. A. (1975). Objective self-awareness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 233–275). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H., Begue, L., & Bushman, B. J. (2012). Too fatigued to care: Ego depletion, guilty, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1183–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Whiteside.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Whiteside, D.B., Barclay, L.J. The Face of Fairness: Self-Awareness as a Means to Promote Fairness among Managers with Low Empathy. J Bus Ethics 137, 721–730 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2357-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2357-7

Keywords

Navigation