Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why do consumers who profess to be concerned about the environment choose not to buy greener products more regularly or even at all? This study explores how consumers’ perceptions towards green products, consumers and consumption practices (termed green perceptions) contribute to our understanding of the discrepancy between green attitudes and behaviour. This study identified several barriers to ethical consumption behaviour within a green consumption context. Three key themes emerged from the study, ‘it is too hard to be green’, ‘green stigma’ and ‘green reservations’. There is currently a perception, based on a number of factors, that it is too hard to be green, which creates a barrier to purchasing green products. Furthermore, some consumers were reluctant or resistant to participate in green consumption practices due to their unfavourable perceptions of green consumers and green messages. This article suggests that green perceptions may influence consumers’ intention to purchase green products. Accordingly, it discusses the implications, and suggests avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahluwalia, R. (2000). Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognitions to behavior (pp. 11–39). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuthnott, K. D. (2010). Taking the long view: Environmental sustainability and delay of gratification. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10(1), 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17(1), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banister, E. N., & Hogg, M. K. (2004). Negative symbolic consumption and consumers’ dive for self-esteem: The case of the fashion industry. European Journal of Marketing, 38(7), 850–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkus, K. R., Hartman, C. L., & Howell, R. D. (1999). The measurement of consumer environmental knowledge: Revisions and extensions. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 14(1), 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlen, G., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1993). Measuring ecological concern: A multi-construct perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 9(4), 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borin, N., Lindsey-Mullikin, J., & Krishnan, R. (2013). An analysis of consumer reactions to green strategies. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(2), 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualtitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study in the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified food—Results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24(1), 23–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W., & Mann, M. (1975). Effect of importance of freedom and attraction to group members on influence produced by group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(5), 816–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, E. (1993). Service attributes: Expectation and judgments. Psychology & Marketing, 10(3), 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S. (2013). Ethical shopping growing in popularity, survey suggests. The Guardian. Accessed 21 July 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/aug/19/ethical-shopping-growing-popularity-fairtrade.

  • Carlson, L., Grove, S. J., & Kangun, N. (1993). A content analysis of environmental advertising claims: A matrix method approach. Journal of Advertising, 22(3), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer: Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, M., Neville, B., & Whitwell, G. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C., & Gronhaug, K. (2001). Qualitative marketing research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEAP. (2007). China general public environmental awareness survey. Accessed 14 March 2012. http://www.chinaceap.org/news/viewen.asp?id=187.

  • Chan, R. Y. K. (1999). Environmental attitudes and behavior of consumers in China. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 11(4), 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R. Y. K. (2001). Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 18(4), 389–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, R., Wong, Y., & Leung, T. (2008). Applying ethical concepts to the study of “Green” consumer behavior: An analysis of Chinese consumers’ intentions to bring their own shopping bags. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 469–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charter, M., Peattie, K., & Polonsky, M. J. (2002). Marketing and sustainability. UK: Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS), in association with The Centre for Sustainable Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., Mittusis, D., & Smith, A. (2004). Virtue in consumption? Journal of Marketing Management, 20(5), 526–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013a). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013b). Towards green trust: The influences of green perceived quality, green perceived risk, and green satisfaction. Management Decision, 51(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clee, M. A., & Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2008). Green consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), 117–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. (2000). Facing the backlash: Green marketing and strategic reorientation in the 1990s. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 8(3), 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. NSW: Allen & Unwinm.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, M. G., Pieters, R., & Fox, J.-P. (2010). Reducing social desirability bias through item randomized response: An application to measure underreported desires. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(1), 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56(6), 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H., & Drury, J. (2000). Self-image—Is it the bag? A qualitative comparison between “ordinary” and “excessive” consumers”. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 109–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, A. (2006). Intangibility and perceived risk in online environments. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(5/6), 553–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2011). Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. Accessed March 12, 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/pdf/ebs_365_en.pdf.

  • Euromonitor International. (2012a). Green buying behaviour: Global online survey. Accessed March 24, 2012. http://www.portal.euromonitor.com.

  • Euromonitor International. (2012b). Home care in Australia. Accessed July 24, 2014. http://www.portal.euromonitor.com.

  • Euromonitor International. (2012c). Nature’s Organic Pty Ltd in home care (Australia). Accessed July 24, 2014. http://www.portal.euromonitor.com.

  • Euromonitor International. (2013). Home Care in UK. Accessed July 22, 2014. http://www.portal.euromonitor.com.

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattig, A., & Hendrickx, L. (2007). Judgmental discounting and environmental risk perception: Dimensional similarities, domain differences, and implications for sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, E. (2008). Stemming the tide of ‘greenwash’. Consumer Policy Review, 18(3), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin, J. J. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). Discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer, M., & Woolley, M. (2014). Green marketing messages and consumers’ purchase intentions: Promoting personal versus environmental benefits. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(4), 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(6), 376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, R. W., & Thompson, D. V. (2007). Is there a substitute for direct experience? Comparing consumers’ preferences after direct and indirect product experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 546–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, J. (2004). Using focus groups to conduct business communication research. Journal of Business Communication, 41(4), 402–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, A. J. (2010). Challenges in researching consumer ethics: A methodological experiment. Qualitative Market Research, 13(3), 236–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., Fryer, K., & Raggett, N. (2008). Household sustainability survey 2008. Research New Zealand for Ministry for the Environment.

  • Kals, E., Schumaker, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L., & Kim, J. (2006). Construal-level effects on preference stability, preference-behavior correspondence, and the suppression of competing brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellehear, A. (1993). The unobtrusive researcher: A guide to methods. Australia: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnear, T. C., Taylor, J. R., & Ahmed, S. A. (1974). Ecologically concerned consumers: Who are they? Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, M., Floh, A., & Zauner, A. (2011). Further insights into perceived value and consumer loyalty: A ‘Green’ perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 28(12), 1154–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide to applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, L., & Lorek, S. (2008). Enabling sustainable production–consumption systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 241–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, L. C. (1990). Assessing educational effectiveness: The focus group interview as a technique for data collection? Communication Education, 39(2), 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessne, G., & Venkatesan, M. (1989). Reactance theory in consumer research: The past, present and future. Advances in Consumer Research, 16(1), 76–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, B., & Alpert, F. (2010). Pricing strategy and the formation and evolution of reference price perceptions in new product categories. Psychology & Marketing, 27(9), 846–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, B., & Barnes, B. R. (2012). Consumer perceptions of monetary and non-monetary introductory promotions for new products. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(5/6), 629–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2013). Tweetjacked: The impact of social media on corporate greenwash. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 747–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., Oates, C., Alevizou, P., Young, W., & Hwang, K. (2006). Communication strategies for sustainable technologies: Identifying patterns of behaviour. Paper presented at the conference name, conference location. Type retrieved from URL.

  • McDonald, S., Oates, C. J., Alevizou, P. J., Young, C. W., & Hwang, K. (2012). Individual strategies for sustainable consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3/4), 445–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGougall, G. H. G. (1983). The green movement in Canada: Implications for marketing strategy. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 5, 69–87.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, C., Carrigan, M., & Szmigin, I. (2012). The coherence of inconsistencies: Attitude–behaviour gaps and new consumption communities. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1–2), 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research (Qualitative Research Methods Series 16). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Morse, J. M. (1994). “Emerging from the data”: The cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 23–43). Thousand Oaks, LA: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E., & Enis, B. M. (1986). Classifying products strategically. Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Editorial: Studying the ethical consumer: A review of research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(Sep–Oct), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen. (2014). Global consumers are willing to put their money where their heart is when it comes to goods and services from companies committed to social responsibility. Accessed July 21, 2014. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/press-room/2014/global-consumers-are-willing-to-put-their-money-where-their-heart-is.html.

  • Nyborg, K. (2003). The impact of public policy on social and moral norms: Some examples. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(3), 259–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S. (2014). Socioecological psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(January), 581–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 195–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Unnava, R. H., & Strathman, A. J. (1991). Theories of attitude change. In T. S. Roberston & H. H. Kassarjian (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 241–280). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Baker, J., & Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5), 281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J. (2011). Transformative green marketing: Impediments and opportunities. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1311–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J., Grau, S. L., & Garma, R. (2010). The new greenwash? Potential marketing problems with carbon offsets. International Journal of Business Studies, 18(1), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pura, M. (2005). Linking perceived value and loyalty in location-based mobile services. Managing Service Quality, 15(6), 509–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, E., Ibbotson, P., & McCole, P. (2006). Application of projective techniques in an e-business research context: A response to ‘Projective techniques in market research—Valueless subjectivity or insightful reality?’. International Journal of Market Research, 48(5), 551–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 805–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettie, R., Burchell, K., & Barnham, C. (2014). Social normalisation: Using marketing to make green normal. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(1), 9-17.

  • Rex, E., & Baumann, H. (2007). Beyond ecolabels: What green marketing can learn from conventional marketing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(6), 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, D. S., & James, A. R. (1999). Environmental segmentation alternatives: A look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(6), 558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samdahl, D. M., & Robertson, R. (1989). Social determinants of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 21(1), 57–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5), 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). USA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2002). An assessment of ethical obligation and self-identity in ethical consumer decision-making: A structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 26(4), 286–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2005). Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 383–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, L. J., McCarty, J. A., & Lowrey, T. M. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising strategy. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, P. (2010). Effects of perceived sacrifice, quality, value, and satisfaction on behavioral intentions in the service environment. Services Marketing Quarterly, 31(4), 466–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2005). Deflecting reactance: The role of similarity in increasing compliance and reducing resistance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(3), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solér, C. (1996). Ecologically friendly buying—Theoretical implications of a phenomenological perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 12(3), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spassova, G., & Lee, A. Y. (2013). Looking into the future: A match between self-view and temporal distance. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(December), 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, C. (1996). Features contributing to the growth of ethical consumerism: A preliminary investigation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14(5), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C., & Wölfing Kast, S. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 20(10), 883–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J. (1997). Interpreting consumers: A hermeneutical framework for deriving marketing insights from texts of consumers’ consumption stories. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(November), 438–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker, A., & Jansen, B. (2006). Environmental impacts of products: A detailed review of studies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(3), 159–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1981). Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it’s measured? Environment and Behavior, 13(6), 651–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2009). Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: The role of reference groups and routine behavior. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendlandt, M., & Schrader, U. (2007). Consumer reactance against loyalty programs. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(5), 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J. L. (1993). What makes people sacrifice their freedom for the good of their community. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12(2), 244–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J. L., & Doescher, T. A. (1994). Cooperation and expectations of cooperation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13(2), 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeking—and rejecting—Validity in qualitative research. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 121–152). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, K., Maesschalck, J., Peeters, C., & Roosen, M. (2014). Methodological issues in the design of online surveys for measuring unethical work behavior: Recommendations on the basis of a split-ballot experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(2), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabkar, V., & Hosta, M. (2013). Willingness to act and environmentally conscious consumer behaviour: Can prosocial status perceptions help overcome the gap? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(3), 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Micael-Lee Johnstone.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Focus Group Participants

Code

Gender

Age

Occupation

Focus group one

 FG1F1

F

23–30

Homemaker

 FG1F2

F

30–34

Engineer

 FG1F3

F

40–54

Public policy analyst

 FG1F4

F

40–54

Artist

 FG1F5

F

40–54

Medical anthropologist

 FG1F6

F

40–54

Self-employed

 FG1F7

F

40–54

Housewife

 FG1M

M

40–49

Trade union organiser

Focus group two

 FG2F1

F

40–54

Early childhood relief teacher

 FG2F2

F

45–49

Homemaker

 FG2F3

F

65+

Retired scientist

 FG2F4

F

70+

Retired

 FG2F5

F

70+

Retired

 FG2M1

M

55–59

House painter

 FG2M2

M

55–64

IT

Focus group three

 FG3F1

F

23–29

Policy analyst

 FG3F2

F

30–39

Accountant

 FG3F3

F

55–64

Unemployed—previously vet nurse

 FG3F4

F

55–59

Administrator

 FG3F5

F

65+

Retired librarian

 FG3F6

F

70+

Retired teacher

 FG3M

M

40–49

Homemaker (previously engineer)

Focus group four

 FG4F1

F

40–49

Receptionist

 FG4F2

F

40–54

Office support

 FG4F3

F

50–54

Auditor

 FG4F4

F

55–59

Nurse

 FG4F5

F

55–59

Contract teacher

 FG4F6

F

55–59

Homemaker

 FG4F7

F

65–69

Retired insurance analyst

Focus group five

 FG5F1

F

30–39

Homemaker

 FG5F2

F

40–49

Research MAF

 FG5F3

F

40–49

Unemployed—previously admin

 FG5F4

F

40–49

Tour guide

 FG5F5

F

60–64

Receptionist

 FG5F6

F

60–64

Administrator

 FG5F7

F

65+

Retired administrator

Focus group six

 FG6F1

F

23–29

Finance

 FG6F2

F

23–29

Policy analyst

 FG6F3

F

31–40

Procurement specialist

 FG6F4

F

40–49

Policy advisor

 FG6F5

F

50–59

Communications advisor

 FG6F6

F

60–64

Tutor

 FG6F7

F

70+

Retired researcher

 FG6M

M

23–29

Postgraduate student

Focus group seven

 FG7F1

F

20–23

Undergraduate student

 FG7F2

F

20–23

Undergraduate student

 FG7F3

F

20–23

Postgraduate student

 FG7F4

F

20–23

Undergraduate student

 FG7F5

F

20–23

Undergraduate student

 FG7M1

M

20–23

Undergraduate student

 FG7M2

M

20–23

Postgraduate student

Appendix 2

Moderator’s Guide: Broad Outline and Structure

  1. 1.

    Introduction

  2. 2.

    Warm-up/ice-breaker exercises

    • Define household products

    • Exercise #1

      • Which of these products do you usually purchase?

      • Provide samples of environmentally friendly (EF) and conventional (non-EF) laundry detergent and stacks of cards with brand names.

  3. 3.

    Discussion part one: What encourages or discourages consumers from purchasing environmentally friendly household products?

    • Why do you purchase these brands (Exercise #1)?

      • Probe: experiences, perceptions.

    • Why do you think other people use/do not use these products?

    • What would encourage you/other people to buy environmentally friendly household products?

  4. 4.

    Discussion part two: What are consumers’ perceptions of being green? What are consumers’ perceptions of the terms “green”/environmentally friendly?

    • Exercise #2

      • Hand out some samples of soaps (EF and non-EF) and answer sheets.

      • If this brand was a person, what type of person would he/she be?

      • What type of characteristics would they have?

        • Probe: What makes you think this?

    • Focus on EF products:

      • Explore current perceptions, and why. What are their experiences?

      • Explore how EF products are currently promoted/packaged?

    • What does being “environmentally friendly” mean?

    • Does it mean the same thing as “green”?

    • Being environmentally friendly/green.

      • How easy/difficult?

      • What makes it easy/difficult?

        • Probe: perceptions—how are these being shaped? Past experience?

    • Green consumers: [draw person on whiteboard]…

      • Describe characteristics, traits, consumption behaviour.

    • What would encourage people to become more environmentally friendly?

  5. 5.

    Discussion part three: What are the perceptions of product packaging?

    • Exercise #3

      • Pass around the table a variety of household dishwashing detergents.

      • On answer sheets: Write some key factors along each product.

    • Which ones do you consider to be environmentally friendly?

      • What factors helped you to decide this?

      • Why do you think these are more/less environmentally friendly?

      • Probes: Terminology, packaging, familiarity.

    • What are your impressions of these products?

      • Probe: easy to understand, performance perceptions.

    • What factors make household products environmentally friendly?

      • Probe level of greenness.

  6. 6.

    Debriefing & closing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnstone, ML., Tan, L.P. Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour. J Bus Ethics 132, 311–328 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2316-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2316-3

Key words

Navigation