Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Governance and Codes of Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a result of recent corporate scandals, several rules have focused on the role played by Boards of Directors on the planning and monitoring of corporate codes of ethics. In theory, outside directors are in a better position than insiders to protect and further the interests of all stakeholders because of their experience and their sense of moral and legal obligations. Female directors also tend to be more sensitive to ethics according to several past studies which explain this affirmation by early gender socialization, the fact that women are thought to place a greater emphasis on harmonious relations and the fact that men and women use different ethical frameworks in their judgments. The goal of this paper is to determine the influence of these characteristics of the Board in terms of promoting and hindering the creation of a code of ethics. Our findings show that a greater number of female directors does not necessarily lead to more ethical companies. Moreover, within Europe as a continent, board ownership leads to an entrenchment of upper-level management, generating a divergence between the ethical interests of owners and managers. In light of this situation, the presence of independent directors is necessary to reduce such conflicts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, M.A. and D. Rachman-Moore: 2004, ‹The Methods Used to Implement and Ethical Code of Conduct and Employee Attitudes,’ Journal of Business Ethics 54, 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldama, E.: 2003, ‹Report by the Special Commission to Foster Transparency and Security in Markets and in Listed Companies’, Special Report, Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (http://www.cnmv.es), Madrid, Spain

  • Allen, J. and D. Davis: 1993, ‹Assessing Some Determinant Effects of Ethical Consulting Behavior: The Case of Personal and Professional,’ Journal of Business Ethics 12 (6), 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A.: 1998, ‹The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good,’ Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9/10), 1093–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arjoon, S.: 2005, ‹Corporate Governance: An Ethical Perspective,’ Journal of Business Ethics 61 (4), 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) Corporate Governance Council: 2003, Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations (Sydney: Australian Stock Exchange).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbeim, R.: 2000, ‹Global Ethics,’ Executive Excellence 17 (5), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbeim, R. E. and J. M. Kaplan: 2004, Ethics Programs… The Role of the Board: A Global Study (Report R-1344, The Conference Board)

  • Bernardi, R.A., S.M. Bosco and K.M. Vassil: 2006, ‹Does female representation on boards of director associate with Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to work for list?,’ Business and Society 45, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, K., D. Matten. and J. Moon: 2004, ‹The Adoption of Voluntary Codes of Conduct in MNCs: A Three-Country Comparative Study,’ Business and Society Review, 109 (4): 449–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonn, I. and J. Fisher: 2005, ‹Corporate Governance and Business Ethics: Insights from the Strategic Planning Experience,’ Corporate Governance: An International Review 13 (6), 730–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boo, E.H. and H.C. Koh: 2001, ‹The influence of organizational and code-supporting variables on the effectiveness of a code of ethics,’ Teaching Business Ethics 5, 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, J., R. Lease and C. Smith: 1988, ‹Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments,’ Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1/2), 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. O. and M. T. Maloney: 1999, Exit, Voice, and the Role of Corporate Directors: Evidence from Acquisition Performance (Claremont Colleges Working Paper)

  • Carasco, E.F. and J.B. Singh: 2003, ‹The Content and Focus of the Codes of Ethics of the World’s Largest Transnational Corporations,’ Business and Society Review 108 (1), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1991, ‹The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’,’ Business and Society 34 (4), 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D.A., Simkins, B.J. and Simpson, W. G.: 2003, ‹Corporate Governance, Board Diversity and Firm Value, ‹ The Financial Review 38, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleek, M.A. and S.L. Leonard: 1998, ‹Can Corporate Codes Ethics Influence Behavior?,’ Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6), 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. and C.A. Moore: 1983, ‹Managerial Values and Corporate Codes of Ethics,’ California Management Review 25 (53), 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo, A.: 2002, ‹Corporate Governance Mechanisms: A Plea for Less Code of Good Governance and More Market Control,’ Corporate Governance 10 (2), 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., M. Rankin and J. Tobin: 2002, ‹An Examination of the Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: A Test of Legitimacy Theory,’ Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15, 312–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, J. and K. Yuthas: 2002, ‹Ethical Audit Decision: A Structuration Perspective,’ Journal of Business Ethics 36 (1/2), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enderle, G.: 1996, ‹FOCUS: A Comparison of Business Ethics in North America and Continental Europe,’ Business Ethics: A European Review 5 (1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.: 1980, ‹Agency Problem and the Theory of the Firm,’ Journal of Political Economy 88, 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, B. and D. Cobbin, 1996: ‹A Content Analysis of Codes of Ethics in Australian Enterprises,’ Journal of Management Development 15 (1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, B., D. Cobbin and H. Farrell: 2002, ‹Can Codes of Ethics Really Produce Consistent Behaviors?,’ Journal of Managerial Psychology 17 (6), 468–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, C. and Arrondo, R.: 2005, ‹Alternative Internal controls as Substitutes of the Board of Directors, ‹ Corporate Governance: an International Review 13 (6), 856–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleege, E. and E. Adrian: 2004, ‹The Implementation of Corporate Ethics: A Comparative Study between Motorola and Ericsson,’ UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research 7, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Lara, J.M. and A. Mora: 2004, ‹Balance Sheet versus Earnings Conservatism in Europe,’ European Accounting Review 13 (2), 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K.: 2000, ‹The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory,’ Journal of Business Ethics 26, 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A.J.: 1979, ‹Some Observations on the Effectiveness of Outside Directors,’ Journal of Contemporary Business 8 (1), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillén, M., D. Melé and P. Murphy: 2002, ‹European vs. American Approaches to Institutionalization of Business Ethics: the Spanish Case,’ Business Ethics: A European Review 11 (2), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R.M. and Cooke, T.E.: 2005, ‹The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting,’ Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24, 391–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S.J.: 1996, ‹The Effect of Codes of Ethics and Personal Denial of Responsibility on Computer Abuse Judgements and Intentions,’ MIS Quarterly 20 (3), 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H.: 2004, ‹Performance Measurement for Voluntary Codes: An Opportunity and a Challenge,’ Business and Society Review 109 (4): 549–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasnas, J.: 1998, ‹The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed’, Business Ethics Quarterly 8, 19–42

  • Healy, M. and J. Isles: 2002, ‹The Establishment and Enforcement of Codes,’ Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1), 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidrick & Struggles, Lore International Institute, Neisendorf & Associates, Inc.: 2004, Assuring Ethical and Responsible Leadership: How to Meet the Challenge.

  • Helin, S. and J. Sandström: 2007, ‹An Inquiry into the Study of Corporate Codes of Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 75, 253–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, D.: 2003, Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors (London: Department of Trade and Industry).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N.A. and J.P. Angelidis: 1995, ‹The Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation of Board Members: Are there Differences between Inside and Outside Directors?,’ Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5), 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N.A., D.P. Howard and J.P. Angelidis: 2003, ‹Board Members in the Service Industry: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Directorial Type,’ Journal of Business Ethics 47 (4), 393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent Directors Association and The Russian Institute of Directors: 2004, Business Ethics (Guidelines for Russian Companies, IDA and Rid, Moscow).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Accountants: 2007, International Good Practice Guidance. Defining and Developing an Effective Code of Conduct for Organizations (IFAC, Professional Accountants in Business Committee)

  • Investment and Financial Services association Limited: 2003, Corporate governance: A Guide for Fund Managers and Corporations (3rd edn. Sydney: IFSA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M.: 2003, Business Ethics (West Legal Studies in Business).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. and W.H. Meckling: 1976, ‹Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,’ Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, I. and M. Pollitt: 1999, The Development of Ethical Issues Facing Boards of Directors: A Model with Implications (Working Paper No. 151, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge)

  • Kaptein, M.: 2004, ‹Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say?,’ Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1), 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. and M.S. Schwartz: 2008, ‹The Effectiveness of Business Codes: A Critical Examination of Existing Studies and the Development of an Integrated Research Model,’ Journal of Business Ethics 77, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein M. and J. Wempe: 1998, ‹Twelve Gordian Knots When Developing and Organizational Code of Ethics,’ Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8), 853–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kedia, B. and E. Kuntz: 1981, The Content of Social Performance: An Empirical Study of Texas Banks, in Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Greenwich CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, I.F., B. Victor. and B. LaMont: 1986, ‹Board Composition and the Commission of Illegal Acts: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies,’ Academy of Management Journal, 29, 789–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG Belgium: 2002, Business Codes in Belgium 2002 (KPMG, Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes. F. and Shleifer, A.: 1999, ‹Corporate Ownership around the World,’ Journal of Finance 54, 471–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J.C.: 1995, ‹Ethics of Business Students: some Marketing Perspectives,’ Journal of Business Ethics 14, 571–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, C.C. and B. Schlegelmilch: 1990, ‹Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United States,’ Journal of International Business Studies 21 (4), 519–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, M. and R J.B. Singh: 1996, ‹A Comparison of the Contents and Foci of Canadian and American Corporate Codes of Ethics,’ International Journal of Management 13 (2), 156–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loe, T., L. Ferrell and P. Mansfield: 2000, `A Review of Empirical Studies. Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business', Journal of Business Ethics 25(3), 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, B.S. and C. Driscoll (2008), “Codes of Ethics and the Pursuit of Organizational Legitimacy: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions,” Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M. C.: 1987, ‹Codes of Ethics: Organizational Behavior and Misbehavior’, in W. C. Fredrick (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance, Vol. 9 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 107–130

  • McKendall, M., B. DeMarr and C. Jones-Rikkers: 2002, ‹Ethical Compliance Programs and Corporate Illegality: Testing the Assumptions of the Corporate Sentencing Guidelines,’ Journal of Business Ethics 59, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D., P. Debeljuh and M.C. Arruda: 2006, ‹Corporate Ethical Policies in Large Corporations in Argentina, Brazil and Spain,’ Journal of Business Ethics 63 (1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melle M.: 1999 ‹El Gobierno de Empresas Cotizadas: Código de Buen Gobierno y Reglamento Tipo del Consejo de Administración,’ Papeles de Economía Española 78–79, 282–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck R., A. Sheleifer and R.W. Vishny: 1988, ‹Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis,’ Journal of Financial Economics 20, p. 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New York Stock Exchange: 2003, ‹Corporate Governance Rules, New York’, http://www. nyse.com/pdfs/finalcorpgovrules.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2007.

  • O’Dwyer, B and G. Madden: 2006, ‹Ethical Codes of Conduct in Irish Companies: A survey of Code Content and Enforcement Procedures,’ Journal of Business Ethics 63 (3), 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD: 2004, ‹Corporate Governance, Frequently Asked Questions about the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance’, http://www.oecd.org/faq/. 15 June 2007.

  • O’Neill, H., H. C. Saunders and A. McCarthy: 1989, Board Members’ Background Characteristics and their Level of Corporate Social Responsiveness: A Multivariate Investigation. Proceeding of the Academy of Management Best Papers, pp. 32–36

  • Payne, D., C. Raiborn and J. Askvik: 1997, ‹A Global Code of Business Ethics,’ Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1727–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D.: 2002, ‹The Relationship Between Unethical Behavior and the Dimensions of the Ethical Climate Questionnaire,’ Journal of Business Ethics 41, 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, M.A and J. W. Henry: 1996, ‹Computer Ethics: The Role of Personal, Informal and Formal Codes,’ Journal of Business Ethics 15 (4), 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C.: 2007, ‹Does Female Board Representation Influence Firm Performance? The Danish Evidence, ‹ Corporate Governance: An International Review 15, 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, G.R. and I. Varner: 1984, ‹What’s wrong with Corporate Codes of Conduct?,’ Management Accounting 66 (1), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. and J. Houston: 1989, ‹Corporate Codes of Ethics in Large U.K. Companies: An Empirical Investigation of Use, Content and Attitudes,’ European Journal of Marketing 23 (6), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S.: 2001, ‹The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behavior,’ Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3), 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.S.: 2002, ‹A Code of Ethics for Corporate Code of Ethics,’ Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1/2), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.S. and A.B. Carroll: 2003, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach,’ Business Ethics Quarterly 13, 503–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M.S., T.W. Dunfee. and M.J. Kline: 2005, ‹Tone at the Top: An Ethics Code for Directors?,’ Journal of Business Ethics 58, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh. J., E. Carasco., G. Svensson., G. Word and M. Callaghan: 2005, ‹A Comparative Study of the Contents of Corporate Codes of Ethics in Australia, Canada and Sweden,’ Journal of World Business, 40, pp. 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, R.S., A.M.K. Chak and J.W.H. Chu: 1999, ‹Codes of Ethics in Hong Kong: Their Adoption and Impact in the Run-up to the 1997 transition of Sovereignty to China,’ Journal of Business Ethics 22 (4), 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, R.S. and N.C. Herndon, Jr.: 2000, ‹An Evaluation of Hong-Kong’s Corporate Code of Ethics Initiative,’ Asia Pacific Journal of Management 17, 493–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, R.: 2002, `Ethical Business and Investment: A Model for Business and Society', Journal of Business Ethics 27(1/2), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B.: 1994, ‹An Analysis of Corporate Ethical Codes Studies: Where do we go from here?,’ Jounal of Business Ethics 30 (2), 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B.: 1996, ‹Using the Competing Values Framework to Assess Corporate Ethical Codes,’ Journal of Business Communication 33 (1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B.: 2004, ‹The Ethics of the US Business Executive: A Study of Perceptions,’ Journal Business Ethics 54, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B.: 2008, ‹Corporate Ethical Codes: Effective Instruments for Influencing Behavior,’ Journal of Business Ethics 78, 601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G., G. Wood and M. Callaghan: 2006, ‹Codes of Ethics in Corporate Sweden,’ Corporate Governance 6, 547–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoutsoura, M.: 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance (Working Paper, Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley)

  • Valentine, S. and T. Barnett: 2002, ‹Ethics Codes and Sales Professionals Perceptions of Their Organizations Ethical Values,’ Journal of Business Ethics 40 (3), 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D.: 1993, ‹Differing National approaches to Business Ethics,’ Business Ethics: A European Review 13, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., C. Bodwell and S. Graves: 2002, ‹Responsibility: The New Business Imperative,’ Academy of Management Executive 16, 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. and S.B. Graves.: 1997, ‹The Corporate Social Performance Financial Performance Link,’ Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. and B.S. Coffey: 1992, ‹Board Composition and Corporate Philanthropy,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 11 (10), 771–778).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E.: 2004, ‹An Examination of Socially Responsible Firms’ Board Structure,’ Journal of Management and Governance 8, 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B.J. and B.R. Montgomery: 1980, ‹Corporate Codes of Conduct,’ California Management Review 23 (2), 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.J.: 2003, ‹Women on Corporate Boards of Directors and their Influence on Corporate Philantropy,’ Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. and M. Callaghan: 2003, ‹Communicating the Ethos of Codes of Ethics in Corporate Australia, 1995–2001: Whose Rights, Whose Responsibilities?,’ Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 15 (4), 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zyglidopoulos, S.C.: 2003, ‹The Issue Life-cycle: Implications for Reputation for Social Performance and Organizational Legitimacy,’ Corporate Reputation Review 6, 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

    Luis Rodriguez-Dominguez, Isabel Gallego-Alvarez & Isabel Maria Garcia-Sanchez

Authors
  1. Luis Rodriguez-Dominguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabel Gallego-Alvarez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isabel Maria Garcia-Sanchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Rodriguez-Dominguez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Gallego-Alvarez, I. & Garcia-Sanchez, I.M. Corporate Governance and Codes of Ethics. J Bus Ethics 90, 187–202 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0035-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0035-y

Key words

Search

Navigation