Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

No effects of experimental warming but contrasting seasonal patterns for soil peptidase and glycosidase enzymes in a sub-arctic peat bog

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nature of linkages between soil C and N cycling is important in the context of terrestrial ecosystem responses to global environmental change. Extracellular enzymes produced by soil microorganisms drive organic matter decomposition, and are considered sensitive indicators of soil responses to environmental variation. We investigated the response of eight hydrolytic soil enzymes (four peptidases and four glycosidases) to experimental warming in a long-term climate manipulation experiment in a sub-arctic peat bog, to determine to what extent the response of these two functional groups are similar. We found no significant effect of experimental spring and summer warming and/or winter snow addition on either the potential activity or the temperature sensitivity (of Vmax) of any of the enzymes. However, strong and contrasting seasonal patterns in both variables were observed. All of the peptidases, as well as alpha-glucosidase, had lower potential activity at the end of summer (August) compared to the beginning (June). Conversely, beta-glucosidase had significantly higher potential activity in August. Peptidases had consistently higher temperature sensitivities in June compared to August, while all four glycosidases showed the opposite pattern. Our results suggest that warming effects on soil enzymes are small compared to seasonal differences, which are most likely mediated by the seasonality of substrate supply and microbial nutrient demand. Furthermore the contrasting seasonal patterns for glycosidases and peptidases suggest that enzyme-based models of soil processes need to allow for potential divergence between the production and activity of these two enzyme functional groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACIA (2004) Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC, van Logtestijn RSP, Callaghan TV (2007) Climate change has only a minor impact on nutrient resorption parameters in a high-latitude peatland. Oecologia 151:132–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R, Callaghan TV, Dorrepaal E, van Logtestijn RSP, Cornelissen JHC (2012) Seasonal climate manipulations have only minor effects on litter decomposition rates and N dynamics but strong effects on litter P dynamics of sub-arctic bog species. Oecologia 170:809–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD (2012) A trait-based approach for modelling microbial litter decomposition. Ecol Lett 15:1058–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD, Martiny JBH (2008) Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11512–11519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37:937–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD, Gartner TB, Holland K, Weintraub M, Sinsabaugh RL (2007) Soil enzymes: linking proteomics and ecological process. In: Lipson DA, Mills AL, Stetzenbach LD (eds) Manual of Environmental Microbiology, 3rd edn. ASM Press, Herndon, pp 704–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD, Wallenstein MD, Bradford MA (2010) Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology. Nat Geosci 3:336–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD, Weintraub M, Gartner TB, Waldrop MP (2011) Evolutionary-economic principles as regulators of soil enzyme production and ecosystem function. In: Shukla G, Varma A (eds) Soil enzymology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell TH, Henry HAL (2011) Fine scale variability in soil extracellular enzyme activity is insensitive to rain events and temperature in a mesic system. Pedobiologia 54:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell TH, Klironomos JN, Henry HAL (2010) Seasonal responses of extracellular enzyme activity and microbial biomass to warming and nitrogen addition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:820–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett SAF, Ostle N, Freeman C (2006) Seasonal variations in decomposition processes in a valley-bottom riparian peatland. Sci Total Environ 370:561–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell BA (2005) Enzyme activities as a component of soil biodiversity: a review. Pedobiologia 49:637–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman SJ, Thurlow M (1998) Peat respiration at low temperatures. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1013–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craine JM, Morrow C, Fierer N (2007) Microbial nitrogen limitation increases decomposition. Ecology 88:2105–2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeForest JL (2009) The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and l-DOPA. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1180–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorrepaal E, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC, Callaghan TV, van Logtestijn RSP (2004) Summer warming and increased winter snow cover affect Sphagnum fuscum growth, structure and production in a sub-arctic bog. Global Change Biol 10:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorrepaal E, Toet S, van Logtestijn RSP, Swart E, van de Weg MJ, Callaghan TV, Aerts R (2009) Carbon respiration from subsurface peat accelerated by climate warming in the subarctic. Nature 460:U616–U679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falge E, Baldocchi D, Tenhunen J, Aubinet M, Bakwin P, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Burba G, Clement R, Davis KJ, Elbers JA, Goldstein AH, Grelle A, Granier A, Guomundsson J, Hollinger D, Kowalski AS, Katul G, Law BE, Malhi Y, Meyers T, Monson RK, Munger JW, Oechel W, Paw KT, Pilegaard K, Rannik U, Rebmann C, Suyker A, Valentini R, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2002) Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements. Agric For Meteorol 113:53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finzi AC, Austin AT, Cleland EE, Frey SD, Houlton BZ, Wallenstein MD (2011) Responses and feedbacks of coupled biogeochemical cycles to climate change: examples from terrestrial ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 9:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Ostle N, Kang H (2001) An enzymic ‘latch’ on a global carbon store—a shortage of oxygen locks up carbon in peatlands by restraining a single enzyme. Nature 409:149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German DP, Chacon SS, Allison SD (2011) Substrate concentration and enzyme allocation can affect rates of microbial decomposition. Ecology 92:1471–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry HAL (2012) Soil extracellular enzyme dynamics in a changing climate. Soil Biol Biochem 47:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger CH, Monson RK, Fisk MC, Schmidt SK (1999) Seasonal partitioning of nitrogen by plants and soil microorganisms in an alpine ecosystem. Ecology 80:1883–1891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens IA, Dieleman W, Luyssaert S, Subke JA, Reichstein M, Ceulemans R, Ciais P, Dolman AJ, Grace J, Matteucci G, Papale D, Piao SL, Schulze ED, Tang J, Law BE (2010) Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition. Nat Geosci 3:315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuper F, Dorrepaal E, Van Bodegom P, Aerts R, van Logtestijn RSP, Callaghan TV, Cornelissen JHC (2011) A race for space? How Sphagnum fuscum stabilizes vegetation composition during long-term climate manipulations. Global Change Biol 17:2162–2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knicker H (2011) Soil organic N—an under-rated player for C sequestration in soils? Soil Biol Biochem 43:1118–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch O, Tscherko D, Kandeler E (2007) Temperature sensitivity of microbial respiration, nitrogen mineralization, and potential soil enzyme activities in organic alpine soils. Global Biogeochem Cycles. doi:10.1029/2007GB002983

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBauer DS, Treseder KK (2008) Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 89:371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limpens J, Berendse F, Blodau C, Canadell JG, Freeman C, Holden J, Roulet N, Rydin H, Schaepman-Strub G (2008) Peatlands and the carbon cycle: from local processes to global implications—a synthesis. Biogeosciences 5:1475–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL (2006) A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecol Monogr 76:151–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead DL, Lashermes G, Sinsabaugh RL (2012) A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 53:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P (2002) Enzyme activities and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. In: Burns RG, Dick RP (eds) Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosswall T, Granhall U (1980) Nitrogen cycling in a subarctic ombrotrophic mire. Ecol Bulletins 30:209–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustad LE, Campbell JL, Marion GM, Norby RJ, Mitchell MJ, Hartley AE, Cornelissen JHC, Gurevitch J (2001) Gcte-news, a meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel JP, Weintraub MN (2003) The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel J, Balser TC, Wallenstein M (2007) Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88:1386–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt SK, Costello EK, Nemergut DR, Cleveland CC, Reed SC, Weintraub MN, Meyer AF, Martin AM (2007) Biogeochemical consequences of rapid microbial turnover and seasonal succession in soil. Ecology 88:1379–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MW, Torn MS, Abiven S, Dittmar T, Guggenberger G, Janssens IA, Kleber M, Kogel-Knabner I, Lehmann J, Manning DA, Nannipieri P, Rasse DP, Weiner S, Trumbore SE (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Foreman CM (2003) Integrating dissolved organic matter metabolism and microbial diversity: an overview of conceptual models. In: Findlay SEG, Sinsabaugh RL (eds) Aquatic ecosystems: interactivity of dissolved organic matter. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL, Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop MP, Wallenstein MD, Zak DR, Zeglin LH (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:1252–1264

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Shah JJF (2009) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature 462:795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skujinš J (1976) Extracellular enzymes in soil. Crit Rev Microbiol 4:383–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd-Brown KEO, Hopkins FM, Kivlin SN, Talbot JM, Allison SD (2012) A framework for representing microbial decomposition in coupled climate models. Biogeochemistry 109:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trasar-Cepeda C, Gil-Sotres F, Leiros MC (2007) Thermodynamic parameters of enzymes in grassland soils from Galicia, NW Spain. Soil Biol Biochem 39:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicca S, Luyssaert S, Penuelas J, Campioli M, Chapin FS, Ciais P, Heinemeyer A, Hogberg P, Kutsch WL, Law BE, Malhi Y, Papale D, Piao SL, Reichstein M, Schulze ED, Janssens IA (2012) Fertile forests produce biomass more efficiently. Ecol Lett 15:520–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitt DH (2006) Functional characteristics and indicators of boreal peatlands. In: Wieder RK, Vitt DH (eds) Boreal peatland ecosystems. Ecological studies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenstein M, McMahon SK, Schimel JP (2009) Seasonal variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities in Arctic tundra soils. Global Change Biol 15:1631–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenstein M, Allison SD, Ernakovich J, Steinweg JM, Sinsabaugh RL (2011) Controls on the temperature sensitivity of soil enzymes: a key driver of in situ enzyme activity rates. In: Shukla G, Varma A (eds) Soil Enzymology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Weedon JT, Aerts R, Kowalchuk GA, van Bodegom PM (2011) Enzymology under global change: organic nitrogen turnover in alpine and sub-arctic soils. Biochem Soc Trans 39:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weedon JT, Kowalchuk GA, Aerts R, van Hal JR, van Logtestijn RKSP, Taş N, Röling WF, van Bodegom PM (2012) Summer warming accelerates sub-arctic peatland nitrogen cycling without changing enzyme pools or microbial community structure. Global Change Biol 18:138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weedon JT, Aerts R, Kowalchuk G, van Logtestijn RkSP, Andringa D, van Bodegom P (2013) Temperature sensitivity of peatland C and N cycling: does substrate supply play a role? Soil Biol Biochem 69:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub MN, Schimel JP (2005) Seasonal protein dynamics in Alaskan arctic tundra soils. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1469–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) by NWO-ALW grant 816.01.012 to RA and GAK. We gratefully acknowledge the efforts of J.H.C. Cornelissen, R.S.P. van Logtestijn and E. Dorrepaal in establishing and maintaining the OTC experiment, thank R.S.P. van Logtestijn for field assistance, and J. Kamstra and P. Cenijn for access to the fluorometer. We also are grateful to Abisko Naturvetenskapliga Station for hosting us during fieldwork. The County Administrative Board at Luleå gave permission to perform the field experiments in Abisko National Park. Comments from anonymous reviewers allowed us to improve upon an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James T. Weedon.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Colin Bell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weedon, J.T., Aerts, R., Kowalchuk, G.A. et al. No effects of experimental warming but contrasting seasonal patterns for soil peptidase and glycosidase enzymes in a sub-arctic peat bog. Biogeochemistry 117, 55–66 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9870-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9870-0

Keywords

Navigation