Skip to main content
Log in

In-situ and laboratory tests of old brick masonry strengthened with FRP in innovative configurations and design considerations

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Worldwide cultural heritage and especially the heritage buildings in Europe are masonry buildings. Such buildings are generally capable to resist vertical loads but horizontal earthquake actions are often critical. The strengthening upgrade is generally required. One of the most promising methods for the strengthening of masonry walls is application of fibre reinforced polymers (FRP) to the surface of the wall. Three sets of the experimental research were performed recently with new innovative configurations of the fibre reinforcement placement on clay brick masonry. Within the framework of European FP7 research project PERPETUATE two sets of in-situ experiments were performed on 12 walls, belonging to two buildings approximately one hundred years old. Both buildings were made of solid bricks in low strength mortar. Third set of tests was performed in the laboratory on 16 specimens made of contemporary solid bricks in good lime-cement mortar. Tests were performed with different reinforcement configurations. Carbon FRP strips were epoxy-bonded horizontally, diagonally or combined (horizontally and vertically). Glass FRP grids were placed in the modified cement mortar over the entire surface of the wall. Specimens were tested under the constant vertical load and by a displacement controlled horizontal cyclic loading. The carbon fibre reinforced polymer strengthening significantly increased the ultimate displacement capacity in case of the horizontal and combined strengthening. The diagonal strengthening was not so effective because the failure of the diagonally strengthened specimens was governed by the peeling of strips from the masonry. The GFRP grid configuration greatly increased the load bearing capacity but not also the ultimate displacement. The shear strength of the strengthened and un-strengthened specimens was compared to the calculated values of the seismic shear load bearing capacity. For that the Triantafillou (J Compos Constr 2(2):96–104, 1998), Triantafillou and Antonopoulos (J Compos Constr ASCE 4(4):198–205, 2000), Marcari et al. (2011) and Wang et al. (Asian J Civil Eng Build Hous 7(6): 563–580, 2006) calculation models and the design guides ACI 440.7R-10 (2010) and CNR-DT 200/2004 were used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI 440.7R-10 (2010) Guide for design & constr of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening unreinforced masonry structures. ACI Committee 440, USA

  • Alcaíno P, Santa María H (2007) Shear response of brick masonry walls externally retrofitted with bonded carbon fiber fabric. 8PCEE — 8th Pacific conference on earthquake engineering, Singapur

  • Borri A, Corradi M, Vignoli A (2001) Seismic upgrading of masonry structures with FRP, 7th international conference on inspection appraisal repairs and maintenance of buildings and structures. Notthingam Trent University, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosiljkov V (2006) Micro vs. macro reinforce. of brickwork masonry. Mat Struct 39(2):235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNR-DT 200 (2004) Guide for design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening existing structures, advisory committee on technical recommendations for construction, Rome—CNR July 13th

  • Croci G, D’Ayala D, D’Asdia P, Palombini F (1987) Analysis on shear walls reinforced with fibers, IABSE Symp. On safety and quality assurance of Civ. Engrg. Struct., Int. Assoc. For Bridge and Struct., Lisbon, Portugal

  • D’Ambrisi A, Feo L, Focacci F (2013) Experimental and analytical investigation on bond between carbon-FRCM materials and masonry. Compos Part B Eng 46:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ElGawady M, Lestuzzi P, Badoux M (2005) In-plane seismic response of URM walls upgraded with FRP. J Compos Constr 9(6):524–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ElGawady M, Lestuzzi P, Badoux M (2007) Static cyclic response of masonry walls retrofitted with fiber-reinforced polymers. J Compos Constr 11(1):50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gostič S, Mezgec A, Žarnić R (2004) Študija učinkovitosti naprednih metod za sanacijo zidanih stavb. Research project MŠZŠ Z2–3411

  • Gostič S, Žarnić R (2006) Strengthening of clay-brick masonry with carbon fibre reinforced plastic strips, conference and brokerage event: construction research needs for the heritage protection. Cavtat, Croatia

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcari G, Manfredi G, Prota A, Pecce M (2007) In-plane shear performance of masonry walls strengthened with FRP. Compos Part B 38(7–8):887–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcari G, Oliveira D, Fabroccino G, Lourenço PB (2011) In-plane behaviour of tuff masonry panels strengthened with FRP diagonal layout, The 11th North American masonry conference. Minneapolis, USA

  • Myers JJ (2011) Strengthening unreinfor. masonry struct. using externally bonded FRP systems: an overview of American concr, instit. 440.7R design appr., 9th Australasian masonry conference, Queenstawn, New Zealand

  • Nardone F, Prota A, Manfredi G (2008) Design criteria for FRP seismic strengthening of masonry walls, The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

  • Papanicolaou CG, Triantafillou TC, Karlos K, Papathanasius M (2006) Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening aterial of URM walls: in-plane cyclic loading. Mater Struct 40:1081–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prota A, Manfredi G, Nardone F (2008) Assessment of design formulas for in-plane FRP strengthening of masonry walls. J Compos Constru ASCE 12(6):643–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santa-Maria H, Duarte G, Garib A (2004) Experimental investigation of masonry panels externally strengthened with CFRP laminates and fabric subjected to in-plane shear load, 8th U.S. National Conference on Eartquake Engineering, San Francisco, USA, Paper No.1042

  • Schwegler G (1994) Masonry constriction strengthened with fiber composites in seismically endangered zones Proc., 10th Europ. Conf. On Earthquake Engrg., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 454–458

  • Tomaževič M, Gams M, Oblak A (2011) Protipotresno utrjevanje opečnih zidov s kompozitnimi oblogami, Gradbeni vestnik, letnik 60, str. 246–257

  • Triantafillou T (2011) Textile-Reinf. Mortars (TRM): a new generation of Comp. Mat. as alternative to Fibre-reinf. Polymers (FRP) for strength. and seismic retrofitting of Struct., Comp. materials, Springer, London

  • Triantafillou TC, Fardis MN (1993) Advanced composites for strengthening historic structures IABSE Symp. on Struct. Preservation of architectural heritage, Int. Assoc. for Bridge and Struct. Eng., Lisbon, Portugal, 541–548

  • Triantafillou TC (1998) Strengthening of masonry structures using epoxy- bonded FRP laminates. J Compos Constr 2(2):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafillou TC, Antonopoulos CP (2000) Design of concrete flexural members strengthened in shear with FRP. J Compos Constr ASCE 4(4):198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnšek V, Čačovič F (1971) Some experimental results on the strength of brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings to 2nd international brick masonry conference. Stoke-on-Trent, U.K., pp 149–156

  • Valluzi MR, Tinazzi D, Modena C (2002) Shear behavior of masonry panels strengthened by FRP laminates. Constr Build Mater 16:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Chai Z, Huang Y, Yang Y, Zhang Y (2006) Seismic shear capacity of brick masonry wall reinforced by GFRP. Asian J Civ Eng Build Hous 7(6):563–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuge Y (2010) FRP-Retrofitted URM Walls under in-plane shear: review and assessment of available models. J Compos Constr 14:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The results in-situ tests have been achieved in the project PERPETUATE (www.perpetuate.eu), funded by the European Commission in the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), under Grant Agreement \(\hbox {n}^{\circ }\) 244229.

The results of laboratory tests were funded by the Ministry of higher education, research and technology of Republic of Slovenia under Grant No. Z2-3411.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Gostič.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jarc Simonič, M., Gostič, S., Bosiljkov, V. et al. In-situ and laboratory tests of old brick masonry strengthened with FRP in innovative configurations and design considerations. Bull Earthquake Eng 13, 257–278 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9644-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9644-7

Keywords

Navigation