Skip to main content
Log in

Parfitians as Exdurantists

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Derek Parfit’s thesis that identity doesn’t matter in survival has been extensively discussed except for its metaphysical robustness. How can we justify the abandonment of identity in the way Parfit suggests? My argument is the following. Those who want to endorse the thesis that identity doesn’t matter (and, therefore, abandon identity across time) should adopt exdurantism, i.e. a metaphysics according to which the world is composed by temporal parts each existing at a time and according to which there is nothing as a numerically same entity which exists at different times. I do that by showing that the metaphysics behind Parfit’s theory is neither compatible with endurantism, according to which object persists by being wholly present at different times, nor with perdurantism, according to which entities are aggregates of temporal and spatial parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Shoemaker (2016).

  2. Parfit (1984: §3, Ch. 12).

  3. This is not the only metaphysical worries about IDMV: prima facie it collides also with the so-called “the only a and b principle”. Given that there are arguments to avoid it for endurantism, perdurantism and exdurantism (Noonan 2003; Sider 2001), I'm not taking it into account as a reason to prefer a particular metaphysical theory or another.

  4. Cf. Varzi (2003a, 61), Sider (2001).

  5. Thanks to an anonymous referee for this helpful comment.

  6. The distinction between “substantial sortals” and “phase sortals” appears in Wiggins (1967).

  7. Parfit (2012: 8–9).

  8. Parfit (2012: 26).

  9. Lewis is not the only one who believes that IDMV can be endorsed in a four-dimensional framework. Merricks (1999) argues that IDMV, along with all the psychological theories of personal identity, is committed to a four-dimensional metaphysics.

  10. Moreover, Lewis and Parfit’s view can be both counted in the field of the psychological criteria of personal identity.

  11. Cf. Sider (2001, 152–153).

  12. Cf. Parfit (1971, 1984).

  13. It is not clear if the fact that two temporal parts are I-related implies that they are also R-related, but we can skip this concern.

  14. See Sattig (2008), Sider (2001, 194).

  15. See Sider (2001), Varzi (2016).

  16. Cf. Sattig (2008, 183).

  17. See Varzi (2003a, b).

  18. That is the reason why, even if some exdurantists, in various way, give an important role to identity (Sider 2001; Hawley 2004) this does not weaken my argument.

  19. For an exhaustive treatment of puzzles of identity through time and the metaphysics of persistence see Sider (2001), Hawley (2004), Loux (2002: §8), Balashov (2013).

References

  • Balashov J (2013) Persistence and spacetime. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley K (2004) How things persist. OUP, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis DK (1983) Philosophical papers, vol I. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Loux MJ (2002) Metaphysics: a contemporary introduction. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Merricks T (1999) Endurance, psychological continuity, and the importance of personal identity. Res 59(4):983–997

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan HW (2003) Personal identity. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson E (1997) The human animal: personal identity without psychology. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson E (2007) What are we? A study in personal ontology. OUP, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit D (1971) Personal identity. Philos Rev 80(1):3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit D (1976) Lewis, Perry, and what matters. In: Rorty A (ed) The identities of persons. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 91–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit D (1984) Reasons and persons. OUP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit D (2012) We are not human beings. Philosophia 87:5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattig T (2008) Identity in 4d. Philos Stud 140(2):179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker D (2016). Personal identity and ethics. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition). URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/identity-ethics/

  • Sider T (2001) Four-dimensionalism: an ontology of persistence and time. OUP, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Varzi AC (2003a) Naming the stages. Dialectica 57(4):387–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varzi AC (2003b) Perdurantism, universalism, and quantifiers. Australas J Philos 81(2):208–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varzi AC (2016) Mereology. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/mereology/

  • Wiggins D (1967) Identity and spatio-temporal continuity. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams B (1973) Are persons bodies? In: Williams B (ed) Problems of the self: Philosophical papers 1956–1972. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 64–81

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Patrone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patrone, F. Parfitians as Exdurantists. Axiomathes 27, 721–729 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-017-9331-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-017-9331-9

Keywords

Navigation