Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Validation of the Response to Sexual Difficulties Scale

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leading models of sexual dysfunction, such as those proposed by Masters and Johnson (1970), Barlow (1986), and Janssen, Everaerd, Spiering, and Janssen (2000), emphasize the role of anxiety and self-monitoring in the development and persistence of sexual difficulties. These models have considerable explanatory power, but focus on the intrapersonal factors that yield anxiety and self-monitoring. Accounting for the interpersonal context in which sexual activity occurs is also likely to be important. For example, anxiety and self-monitoring may arise from negative, yet accurate, predictions about how one’s partner will respond to one’s own sexual functioning difficulties. The current studies describe the development and validation of the Response to Sexual Difficulties Scale (RSDS), which was designed to assess how one expects one’s partner to respond to one’s own sexual difficulties (RSDS-Own Difficulties) and how one expects oneself to respond to one’s partner’s sexual difficulties (RSDS-Partner Difficulties). Study 1 established the initial reliability and construct validity of the RSDS-Own Difficulties in a sample of adults in committed relationships (N = 59). Study 2 further examined the construct and discriminant validity of the RSDS Own Difficulties and Partner Difficulties in a sample of heterosexual couples (N = 87). Results indicated that both measures had strong internal consistency and were not redundant with measures of mood or personality. Scores on the RSDS-Own Difficulties and Partner Difficulties were strongly associated, indicating that reports of one’s own response to one’s partner’s difficulty matched the partner’s assessment of the reaction. RSDS scores predicted sexual functioning, relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and sexual communication. The RSDS may, then, provide a useful means of assessing the role of interpersonal factors in the development and persistence of sexual difficulties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 176–181. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 140–148. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.54.2.140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 51–65. doi:10.1080/009262300278641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, S. R., & Broderick, J. E. (1983). Commitment: A variable in women’s response to marital therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy, 11, 16–24. doi:10.1080/01926188308250143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, J. A. (1998). Dyadic sexual communication scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (2nd ed., pp. 129–131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, J. A., Pollack, L., McDermott, L., Qualls, S., & Cole, L. (1990). Help-seeking behaviors of people with sexual problems. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 235–250. doi:10.1007/BF01541549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M., Ross, L. E., Cook, G. S., Grigoriadis, S., Villegas, L., & Bradley, L. (2008, October). Mental health and sexuality in the postpartum period: Research in progress. Paper presented at the Canadian Sex Research Forum, Montreal, PQ.

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 169–197. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R. (2002). Sexual dysfunction: Overview of prevalence, etiological factors and treatments. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 73–78. doi:10.1080/00224490209552124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, J. R. (2007). Orgasmic disorders in women. In S. R. Leiblum (Ed.), Principles and practice of sex therapy (4th ed., pp. 84–123). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. W. (1993). Index of Sexual Satisfaction. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (2nd ed., pp. 512–513). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23. doi:10.1080/00224490009552016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 537–544. doi:10.1001/jama.281.6.537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrance, K., & Byers, E. S. (1992, May). Sexual satisfaction: A social exchange perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Quebec City.

  • Lawrance, K., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 267–285. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiblum, S. R., & Rosen, R. C. (Eds.). (2000). Principles and practice of sex therapy (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S. (1997). The relationships between sexual problems, communication, and sexual satisfaction. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6, 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1970). Human sexual inadequacy. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, M. E., & Epstein, N. (2002). Assessing the role of relationship conflict in sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 139–164. doi:10.1080/00926230252851889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A., & Purdon, C. (2011). Non-erotic thoughts and sexual problems in a community sample: Associations with thought content, affect and attentional focus. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 395–406. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9693-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre, P. J., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2003). Sexual modes questionnaire: Measure to assess the interaction among cognitions, emotions and sexual response. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 368–382. doi:10.1080/00224490209552203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre, P. J., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2008). Cognitions, emotions, and sexual response: Analysis of the relationship among automatic thoughts, emotional responses, and sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 37, 652–661. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9258-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdon, C., & Holdaway, L. (2006). Non-erotic thoughts: Content and relation to sexual functioning and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 154–162. doi:10.1080/00224490609552310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purdon, C., & Watson, C. (2011). Non-erotic thoughts and sexual functioning. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 891–902. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9755-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purnine, D. M., & Carey, M. P. (1997). Interpersonal communication and sexual adjustment: The roles of understanding and agreement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 1017–1025. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.65.6.1017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman, U. S., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2006). A cross-cultural analysis of the demand-withdraw marital interaction: Observing couples from a developing country. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 755–766. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renaud, C. A., & Byers, E. S. (2001). Positive and negative sexual cognitions: subjective experience and relationship to sexual adjustment. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 252–262. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9046-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, D., van Diest, S., Incrocci, L., & Slob, A. K. (2005). Psychosexual factors that differentiate men with inhibited ejaculation from men with no dysfunction or another sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2, 383–389. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20352.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sbrocco, T., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Conceptualizing the cognitive component of sexual arousal: Implications for sexuality research and treatment. In P. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 419–449). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28. doi:10.2307/350547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hout, M., & Barlow, D. H. (2000). Attention, arousal and expectancies in anxiety and sexual disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 241–256. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00341-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, A. D., & Byers, E. S. (2006). The relationships among body image, body mass index, exercise, and sexual functioning in heterosexual women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 333–339. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00308.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiederman, M. W. (1999). Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 59–66. doi:10.1080/00224499909551968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witting, K., Santtila, P., Alanka, K., Harlaar, N., Jern, P., Johansson, A., et al. (2008). Female sexual function and its associations with number of children, pregnancy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 34, 89–106. doi:10.1080/00926230701636163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) grant awarded to the second author, a SSHRC-CGS awarded to the first author, and Ontario Graduate Scholarships awarded to the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin E. Fallis.

Appendix: Response to Sexual Difficulties Scale

Appendix: Response to Sexual Difficulties Scale

Instructions for RSDS-Own Difficulties Version

Please select the point on each scale that best describes how you expect your partner would respond in the moment if you were to experience a sexual difficulty [e.g., difficulties getting ‘in the mood’, difficulties becoming aroused or maintaining arousal, difficulties with climax (too soon, not soon enough), pain during intercourse]. If a word pair does not apply to you and/or in your relationship, please choose Neutral (4).

Instructions for RSDS-Partner Difficulties Version

Please select the point on each scale that best describes how you expect you would respond in the moment if your partner were to experience a sexual difficulty [e.g., difficulties getting ‘in the mood’, difficulties becoming aroused or maintaining arousal, difficulties with climax (too soon, not soon enough), pain during intercourse]. If a word pair does not apply to you and/or in your relationship, please choose Neutral (4).

Hostile

  

Neutral

  

Warm

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Rude

  

Neutral

  

Considerate

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Cold

  

Neutral

  

Loving

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Sad

  

Neutral

  

Hopeful

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Harsh

  

Neutral

  

Kind

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Indifferent

  

Neutral

  

Compassionate

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Suspicious

  

Neutral

  

Trusting

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Helpless

  

Neutral

  

Strong

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Scornful

  

Neutral

  

Respectful

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Baffled

  

Neutral

  

Insightful

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Worried

  

Neutral

  

Unconcerned

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Pessimistic

  

Neutral

  

Optimistic

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Ashamed

  

Neutral

  

Unashamed

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Guilty

  

Neutral

  

Blameless

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Turned Off

  

Neutral

  

Still Aroused

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Impatient

  

Neutral

  

Patient

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Judgmental

  

Neutral

  

Understanding

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Uncaring

  

Neutral

  

Caring

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Unsupportive

  

Neutral

  

Supportive

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Distant

  

Neutral

  

Close

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Angry

  

Neutral

  

Calm

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Insensitive

  

Neutral

  

Sensitive

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Withdrawn

  

Neutral

  

Forthcoming

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fallis, E.E., Purdon, C. & Rehman, U.S. Development and Validation of the Response to Sexual Difficulties Scale. Arch Sex Behav 42, 67–79 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9973-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9973-z

Keywords

Navigation